• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

波兰卢布林县道路交通伤害模式。

Pattern of road traffic injuries in Lublin County, Poland.

作者信息

Goniewicz Mariusz, Nogalski Adam, Khayesi Meleckidzedeck, Lübek Tomasz, Zuchora Beata, Goniewicz Krzysztof, Miśkiewicz Paulina

机构信息

Emergency Medicine Unit, Medical University of Lublin, Poland.

出版信息

Cent Eur J Public Health. 2012 Jun;20(2):116-20. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3686.

DOI:10.21101/cejph.a3686
PMID:22966734
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Road traffic injury patients admitted to 35 hospitals in Lublin region.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the pattern of road traffic injuries in Lublin county, Poland.

METHODS

Review of medical records for the period from January 2004 to December 2005.

RESULTS

Pedestrians accounted for the largest share of the Road traffic crash (RTC) injury cases (35.8%) and 46.4% of deaths. The highest mortality was observed in motorcycle occupants (7.1%) and victims with abdominal injuries (9.8%). Vulnerable road users represented 71.4% of all RTC deaths, with mortality 5.8%. Early transfers accounted for 82.5% of cases. Mortality in early transfers is 4 times higher than in late transfers.

CONCLUSIONS

Poland ranks as one of the worst European countries in terms of severity and fatal outcomes of road traffic injuries. Groups of road users in Poland at the highest risk are pedestrians, cyclists, children and young male drivers. The highest mortality rate occurs among road users affected by multiple trauma and head/vertebral column injuries. Alleviation of consequences of road traffic injuries in Poland may be achieved by coordinated efforts and collective responsibility of government, central level agencies, rescue team members and community groups.

摘要

背景

卢布林地区35家医院收治的道路交通伤患者。

目的

描述波兰卢布林县道路交通伤的模式。

方法

回顾2004年1月至2005年12月期间的医疗记录。

结果

行人在道路交通碰撞(RTC)伤病例中占比最大(35.8%),在死亡病例中占46.4%。摩托车驾乘人员(7.1%)和腹部受伤受害者(9.8%)的死亡率最高。易受伤害的道路使用者占所有RTC死亡人数的71.4%,死亡率为5.8%。早期转运占病例的82.5%。早期转运的死亡率比晚期转运高4倍。

结论

就道路交通伤的严重程度和致命后果而言,波兰是欧洲最差的国家之一。波兰风险最高的道路使用者群体是行人、骑自行车的人、儿童和年轻男性司机。在受多发伤和头部/脊柱损伤影响的道路使用者中死亡率最高。波兰可通过政府、中央机构、救援团队成员和社区团体的共同努力和集体责任来减轻道路交通伤的后果。

相似文献

1
Pattern of road traffic injuries in Lublin County, Poland.波兰卢布林县道路交通伤害模式。
Cent Eur J Public Health. 2012 Jun;20(2):116-20. doi: 10.21101/cejph.a3686.
2
Ecological study of road traffic injuries in the eastern Mediterranean region: country economic level, road user category and gender perspectives.东地中海地区道路交通伤害的生态学研究:国家经济水平、道路使用者类别和性别视角。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Feb 13;18(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5150-1.
3
Comparison of epidemiology and injury profile between vulnerable road users and motor vehicle occupants in road traffic fatalities.道路交通事故死亡中弱势道路使用者与机动车驾乘人员的流行病学和损伤特征比较。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(6):581-587. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1539840. Epub 2019 Jul 22.
4
Injury incidence rates of cyclists compared to pedestrians, car occupants and powered two-wheeler riders, using a medical registry and mobility data, Rhône County, France.使用医疗登记和移动数据,比较骑自行车者与行人和汽车乘客及两轮助力车骑手的受伤发生率,法国罗讷省。
Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Sep;58:35-45. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 Apr 24.
5
Road traffic deaths in Brazil: rising trends in pedestrian and motorcycle occupant deaths.巴西道路交通死亡人数:行人及摩托车乘客死亡人数呈上升趋势。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13 Suppl 1:11-6. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.633289.
6
The Effect of Ethyl Alcohol upon Pedestrian Trauma Sustained in Traffic Crashes.乙醇对行人在交通事故中遭受创伤的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Apr 25;16(8):1471. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081471.
7
Fatal and serious injuries related to vulnerable road users in Canada.加拿大与弱势道路使用者相关的致命和严重伤害。
J Safety Res. 2016 Sep;58:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 14.
8
The epidemiology and outcomes of severe road traffic injury by road user type in Korea: A nationwide retrospective observational study.韩国不同交通方式使用者严重道路交通伤害的流行病学和结局:一项全国性回顾性观察研究。
Injury. 2024 Oct;55(10):111732. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111732. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
9
Factors affecting anatomical region of injury, severity, and mortality for road trauma in a high-income developing country: lessons for prevention.影响高收入发展中国家道路创伤损伤部位、严重程度和死亡率的因素:预防的教训。
Injury. 2009 Jul;40(7):703-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.07.012. Epub 2008 Dec 30.
10
The road to recovery for vulnerable road users hospitalised for orthopaedic injury following an on-road crash.在道路碰撞后因骨科受伤而住院的弱势道路使用者的康复之路。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Nov;132:105279. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105279. Epub 2019 Sep 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The epidemiology of road traffic injuries in the republic of Serbia: a study based on hospital data, 2015-2019.塞尔维亚共和国道路交通伤害的流行病学:一项基于医院数据的研究,2015 - 2019年
Front Public Health. 2024 Nov 15;12:1468505. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1468505. eCollection 2024.
2
Road traffic injuries in Poland: magnitude and risk factors.波兰道路交通伤害:规模和危险因素。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Oct;45(5):815-820. doi: 10.1007/s00068-019-01093-6. Epub 2019 Feb 12.
3
Epidemiologic Aspects of Overall Injuries in Hamadan Province; A Six-Year Registry-Based Analysis.
哈马丹省总体伤害的流行病学特征;基于六年登记处数据的分析。
Bull Emerg Trauma. 2018 Jul;6(3):233-238. doi: 10.29252/beat-060308.
4
Road accident rates: strategies and programmes for improving road traffic safety.道路事故率:改善道路交通安全的策略和计划。
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2016 Aug;42(4):433-438. doi: 10.1007/s00068-015-0544-6. Epub 2015 Jul 11.
5
Epidemiology of Road Traffic Injuries Treated in a Large Romanian Emergency Department in Tîrgu-Mureş Between 2009 and 2010.2009年至2010年在特尔古穆列什的一家大型罗马尼亚急诊科治疗的道路交通伤害的流行病学
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16(8):835-41. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1030501. Epub 2015 Apr 1.