• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

如何改进用药安全的沟通?:在世界卫生组织国际药物监测规划年度会议上关于社会营销和针对患者的方法的讨论。

How to improve communication for the safe use of medicines?: Discussions on social marketing and patient-tailored approaches at the annual meetings of the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring.

机构信息

European Medicines Agency, London, UK.

出版信息

Drug Saf. 2012 Dec 1;35(12):1073-9. doi: 10.2165/11640530-000000000-00000.

DOI:10.2165/11640530-000000000-00000
PMID:22974514
Abstract

Over the past decade, the annual meetings of national centres participating in the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring have increasingly included discussions on how to improve communication between national pharmacovigilance centres, patients, healthcare professionals, policy makers and the general public, with the aim of promoting the safe use of medicines. At the most recent meetings, working groups were dedicated to discuss possible applications and implementation of social marketing and patient-tailored approaches. This article provides the history and a summary of the recent discussions and recommendations to support progress in this respect at national and global level. Recommendations are made to investigate and pilot these approaches in small-scale projects at national pharmacovigilance centres. Applying elements from the social marketing and patient-tailored approaches to support behaviours of safe medicines use in patients and healthcare professionals should give the pharmacovigilance community new tools to achieve their goal to minimize risks with medicines and improve patient safety.

摘要

在过去的十年中,参加世界卫生组织国际药物监测规划的国家中心的年度会议越来越多地讨论如何改善国家药物警戒中心、患者、医疗保健专业人员、政策制定者和公众之间的沟通,以促进药物的安全使用。在最近的会议上,专门成立了工作组来讨论社会营销和针对患者的方法的可能应用和实施。本文提供了历史背景和最近讨论的摘要,以支持在国家和全球层面取得这方面的进展。建议在国家药物警戒中心的小规模项目中调查和试点这些方法。将社会营销和针对患者的方法的要素应用于支持患者和医疗保健专业人员安全用药行为,应为药物警戒界提供新的工具,以实现其目标,即最大限度地降低药物风险,提高患者安全性。

相似文献

1
How to improve communication for the safe use of medicines?: Discussions on social marketing and patient-tailored approaches at the annual meetings of the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring.如何改进用药安全的沟通?:在世界卫生组织国际药物监测规划年度会议上关于社会营销和针对患者的方法的讨论。
Drug Saf. 2012 Dec 1;35(12):1073-9. doi: 10.2165/11640530-000000000-00000.
2
Pharmacovigilance activities in 55 low- and middle-income countries: a questionnaire-based analysis.55 个中低收入国家的药物警戒活动:基于问卷调查的分析。
Drug Saf. 2010 Aug 1;33(8):689-703. doi: 10.2165/11536390-000000000-00000.
3
Pharmacovigilance in India: Present Scenario and Future Challenges.印度的药物警戒:现状与未来挑战。
Drug Saf. 2019 Mar;42(3):339-346. doi: 10.1007/s40264-018-0730-7.
4
Knowledge of Adverse Drug Reaction Reporting and the Pharmacovigilance of Biological Medicines: A Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Ireland.爱尔兰医护人员对药物不良反应报告和生物药品药物警戒知识的调查
BioDrugs. 2018 Jun;32(3):267-280. doi: 10.1007/s40259-018-0281-6.
5
Pharmacovigilance in oncology: evaluation of current practice and future perspectives.肿瘤学中的药物警戒:当前实践评估与未来展望
J Eval Clin Pract. 2014 Oct;20(5):559-69. doi: 10.1111/jep.12184. Epub 2014 Jun 7.
6
The role of the WHO programme on International Drug Monitoring in coordinating worldwide drug safety efforts.世界卫生组织国际药品监测规划在协调全球药品安全工作方面的作用。
Drug Saf. 1998 Jul;19(1):1-10. doi: 10.2165/00002018-199819010-00001.
7
Harmonization of Pharmacovigilance Regulation in Brazil: Opportunities to Improve Risk Communication.巴西药物警戒法规的协调统一:改善风险沟通的机会。
Clin Ther. 2019 Mar;41(3):598-603. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2019.01.013. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
8
Safety Concerns Reported by Patients Identified in a Collaborative Signal Detection Workshop using VigiBase: Results and Reflections from Lareb and Uppsala Monitoring Centre.使用 VigiBase 在协作信号检测研讨会上报告的患者报告的安全问题:Lareb 和 Uppsala 监测中心的结果和反思。
Drug Saf. 2018 Feb;41(2):203-212. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0594-2.
9
WHO strategy for collecting safety data in public health programmes: complementing spontaneous reporting systems.世卫组织在公共卫生规划中收集安全数据的战略:补充自发报告系统。
Drug Saf. 2013 Feb;36(2):75-81. doi: 10.1007/s40264-012-0014-6.
10
Pharmacovigilance in China: current situation, successes and challenges.中国的药物警戒:现状、成就与挑战
Drug Saf. 2014 Oct;37(10):765-70. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0222-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Strategies to enhance risk communication about medicines in Malaysia: a Delphi study among multinational experts.马来西亚药品风险沟通策略:跨国专家德尔菲研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 3;24(1):1019. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11476-0.
2
Communicating for the Safe Use of Medicines: Progress and Directions for the 2020s Promoted by the Special Interest Group of the International Society of Pharmacovigilance.促进安全用药沟通:国际药物警戒学会特别兴趣小组推动的2020年代进展与方向
Drug Saf. 2023 Jun;46(6):517-532. doi: 10.1007/s40264-023-01285-5. Epub 2023 May 23.
3
Community pharmacy staff perceptions on preventing alcohol and medication interactions in older adults.

本文引用的文献

1
Percentage of patients with preventable adverse drug reactions and preventability of adverse drug reactions--a meta-analysis.患者中可预防的药物不良反应的比例和药物不良反应的可预防程度——一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033236. Epub 2012 Mar 15.
2
Frequency of and risk factors for preventable medication-related hospital admissions in the Netherlands.荷兰可预防的药物相关住院情况的发生率及风险因素
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Sep 22;168(17):1890-6. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2008.3.
3
Which drugs cause preventable admissions to hospital? A systematic review.
社区药房工作人员对预防老年人酒精与药物相互作用的看法。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2016 Sep-Oct;56(5):544-8. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2016.04.561.
4
Governance and pharmacovigilance in Brazil: a scoping review.巴西的治理与药物警戒:一项范围界定综述
J Pharm Policy Pract. 2016 Feb 8;9:3. doi: 10.1186/s40545-016-0053-y. eCollection 2016.
5
Pharmaceutical company perspectives on current safety risk communications in Japan.制药公司对日本当前安全风险沟通的看法。
Springerplus. 2014 Jan 24;3:51. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-51. eCollection 2014.
哪些药物会导致可避免的住院情况?一项系统评价。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Feb;63(2):136-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2006.02698.x. Epub 2006 Jun 26.
4
Adverse drug reaction monitoring--cost and benefit considerations. Part II: cost and preventability of adverse drug reactions leading to hospital admission.药品不良反应监测——成本与效益考量。第二部分:导致住院的药品不良反应的成本及可预防性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1997 Oct;6 Suppl 3:S79-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1557(199710)6:3+<s79::aid-pds294>3.3.co;2-f.
5
Adverse drug reaction monitoring--cost and benefit considerations. Part I: frequency of adverse drug reactions causing hospital admissions.药品不良反应监测——成本与效益考量。第一部分:导致住院的药品不良反应发生率
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 1997 Oct;6 Suppl 3:S71-7. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1557(199710)6:3+<s71::aid-pds282>3.3.co;2-9.
6
Hospitalisations caused by adverse drug reactions (ADR): a meta-analysis of observational studies.药物不良反应(ADR)导致的住院治疗:观察性研究的荟萃分析。
Pharm World Sci. 2002 Apr;24(2):46-54. doi: 10.1023/a:1015570104121.
7
Retrospective analysis of mortalities associated with medication errors.与用药差错相关的死亡病例回顾性分析。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2001 Oct 1;58(19):1835-41. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/58.19.1835.
8
Admissions to hospital caused by adverse drug reactions: cross sectional incidence study. French Pharmacovigilance Centres.药物不良反应导致的住院情况:横断面发病率研究。法国药物警戒中心。
BMJ. 2000 Apr 15;320(7241):1036. doi: 10.1136/bmj.320.7241.1036.
9
The public health implications of the 1995 'pill scare'.1995年“避孕药恐慌”对公共卫生的影响。
Hum Reprod Update. 1999 Nov-Dec;5(6):621-6. doi: 10.1093/humupd/5.6.621.