• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者为何需要领导者:引入病房安全清单。

Why patients need leaders: introducing a ward safety checklist.

机构信息

University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London NW1 2PG, UK.

出版信息

J R Soc Med. 2012 Sep;105(9):377-83. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2012.120098.

DOI:10.1258/jrsm.2012.120098
PMID:22977047
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3439665/
Abstract

The safety and consistency of the care given to hospital inpatients has recently become a particular political and public concern. The traditional 'ward round' presents an obvious opportunity for systematically and collectively ensuring that proper standards of care are being achieved for individual patients. This paper describes the design and implementation of a 'ward safety checklist' that defines a set of potential risk factors that should be checked on a daily basis, and offers multidisciplinary teams a number of prompts for sharing and clarifying information between themselves, and with the patient, during a round. The concept of the checklist and the desire to improve ward rounds were well received in many teams, but the barriers to adoption were informative about the current culture on many inpatient wards. Although the 'multidisciplinary ward round' is widely accepted as good practice, the medical and nursing staff in many teams are failing to coordinate their workloads well enough to make multidisciplinary rounds a working reality. 'Nursing' and 'medical' care on the ward have become 'de-coupled' and the potential consequences for patient safety and good communication are largely self-evident. This problem is further complicated by a medical culture which values the primacy of clinical autonomy and as a result can be resistant to perceived attempts to 'systematize' medical care through instruments such as checklists.

摘要

最近,医院住院患者所接受的护理的安全性和一致性成为了一个特别的政治和公众关注的问题。传统的“病房查房”为系统地、集体地确保为每个患者实现适当的护理标准提供了明显的机会。本文描述了一种“病房安全检查表”的设计和实施,该检查表定义了一组每日应检查的潜在风险因素,并为多学科团队提供了一些提示,以便在查房期间彼此之间以及与患者之间共享和澄清信息。检查表的概念和改进病房查房的愿望在许多团队中得到了很好的认可,但采用的障碍反映了许多住院病房当前的文化。尽管“多学科病房查房”被广泛认为是良好的实践,但许多团队中的医护人员未能很好地协调他们的工作量,以使多学科查房成为现实。病房中的“护理”和“医疗”护理已经“脱钩”,对患者安全和良好沟通的潜在后果是显而易见的。这种问题进一步复杂化了一种医疗文化,这种文化重视临床自主性的首要地位,因此可能会抵制通过检查表等工具对医疗保健进行“系统化”的尝试。

相似文献

1
Why patients need leaders: introducing a ward safety checklist.患者为何需要领导者:引入病房安全清单。
J R Soc Med. 2012 Sep;105(9):377-83. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2012.120098.
2
Introduction of a new ward round approach in a cardiothoracic critical care unit.心胸重症监护病房引入新的查房方法
Nurs Crit Care. 2015 Jul;20(4):210-8. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12149. Epub 2015 Jan 16.
3
Is the post-take ward round standardised?术后查房是否标准化?
Clin Teach. 2012 Oct;9(5):334-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2012.00566.x.
4
Ward rounds, participants, roles and perceptions: literature review.查房、参与者、角色与认知:文献综述
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2016 May 9;29(4):364-79. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-04-2015-0053.
5
[Interface ward round].[界面查房]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2016 Jan;141(1):28-31. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-108830. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
6
'Safety by DEFAULT': introduction and impact of a paediatric ward round checklist.“默认安全”:儿科查房检查表的介绍与影响
Crit Care. 2013 Oct 11;17(5):R232. doi: 10.1186/cc13055.
7
Patient safety ward round checklist via an electronic app: implications for harm prevention.通过电子应用程序的患者安全查房检查表:对预防伤害的影响
Ir J Med Sci. 2018 Aug;187(3):553-559. doi: 10.1007/s11845-017-1687-8. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
8
Measuring ward round quality in urology.评估泌尿外科查房质量。
Int J Risk Saf Med. 2015;27(1):23-33. doi: 10.3233/JRS-150640.
9
Exploring interdisciplinary teamwork to support effective ward rounds.探索跨学科团队合作以支持有效的病房查房。
Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2020 Jul 14;33(4-5):373-387. doi: 10.1108/IJHCQA-10-2019-0178.
10
Mixed methods quality evaluation of structured interprofessional medical ward rounds.结构化跨专业医疗查房的混合方法质量评价。
Intern Med J. 2020 Feb;50(2):222-231. doi: 10.1111/imj.14330.

引用本文的文献

1
Quality Improvement in Pediatric Surgical Ward Rounds after Implementation of Checklist.实施检查表后儿科外科查房的质量改进
J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2023 Jan-Feb;28(1):54-58. doi: 10.4103/jiaps.jiaps_169_21. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
2
New take on the post-take ward round: a quality improvement project undertaken in a district general hospital.新视角下的术后查房:在一家地区综合医院开展的一项质量改进项目。
BMJ Open Qual. 2022 Oct;11(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-001923.
3
Patient participation in inpatient ward rounds on acute inpatient medical wards: a descriptive study.患者参与急性住院内科病房的住院查房:一项描述性研究。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2019 Jan;28(1):15-23. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007292. Epub 2018 Feb 23.
4
"The Longest Way Round Is The Shortest Way Home": An Overhaul of Surgical Ward Rounds.“绕最远的路就是回家最近的路”:外科病房查房的全面改革
World J Surg. 2018 Apr;42(4):937-949. doi: 10.1007/s00268-017-4267-1.
5
Medical ward round competence in internal medicine - an interview study towards an interprofessional development of an Entrustable Professional Activity (EPA).内科医疗查房能力——一项关于可托付专业活动(EPA)跨专业发展的访谈研究
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jul 11;16:174. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0697-y.
6
Developing a ward round checklist to improve patient safety.制定查房检查表以提高患者安全。
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 Feb 11;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u204775.w2440. eCollection 2015.
7
Teaching a 'good' ward round.讲授一次“优质”的查房
Clin Med (Lond). 2015 Apr;15(2):135-8. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.15-2-135.
8
How asking patients a simple question enhances care at the bedside: medical students as agents of quality improvement.向患者提出一个简单问题如何提升床边护理质量:医学生作为质量改进的推动者。
Perm J. 2013 Fall;17(4):27-31. doi: 10.7812/TPP/13-028.

本文引用的文献

1
Systematic review of safety checklists for use by medical care teams in acute hospital settings--limited evidence of effectiveness.系统评价医疗保健团队在急性医院环境中使用安全检查表的效果——有效性的证据有限。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2011 Sep 2;11:211. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-211.
2
The business case for quality: economic analysis of the Michigan Keystone Patient Safety Program in ICUs.质量的商业案例:密歇根重症监护病房关键患者安全项目的经济分析
Am J Med Qual. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):333-9. doi: 10.1177/1062860611410685.
3
How Intermountain trimmed health care costs through robust quality improvement efforts.通过强有力的质量改进措施来降低成本。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Jun;30(6):1185-91. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0358. Epub 2011 May 19.
4
Impact of a statewide intensive care unit quality improvement initiative on hospital mortality and length of stay: retrospective comparative analysis.全州范围内重症监护病房质量改进计划对医院死亡率和住院时间的影响:回顾性对比分析。
BMJ. 2011 Jan 28;342:d219. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d219.
5
Adopting a surgical safety checklist could save money and improve the quality of care in U.S. hospitals.采用手术安全核对表可以节省美国医院的成本并提高护理质量。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Sep;29(9):1593-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0709.