Health and Rehabilitation Research Institute, AUT University, Auckland 1142, New Zealand.
J Pain. 2012 Oct;13(10):936-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.07.005. Epub 2012 Sep 13.
A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were undertaken to determine if conditioned pain modulation is dysfunctional in populations with chronic pain. Studies that used a standardized protocol to evaluate conditioned pain modulation in a chronic pain population and in a healthy control population were selected and reviewed. Thirty studies were included in the final review, encompassing data from 778 patients and 664 control participants. Across all studies there was a large effect size of .78, reflecting reduced conditioned pain modulation in the patient group. Analysis of moderator variables indicated a significant influence of participant gender and age on the effect size. Methodological moderator variables of type of outcome measure, type of test stimulus, type of conditioning stimulus, and the level of conditioning stimulus pain were not significant. A risk of bias assessment indicated that poor blinding of assessors and a lack of control of confounding variables were common. It is concluded that conditioned pain modulation is impaired in populations with chronic pain. Future studies should ensure adequate matching of participant age and gender between patient and control groups, blinding of the assessors obtaining the outcome measures, and more rigorous control for variables known to influence the level of modulation.
This review compared the efficacy of conditioned pain modulation between chronic pain and healthy populations. The finding of impaired modulation in the chronic pain groups highlights the dysfunction of endogenous pain modulatory mechanisms in this population.
系统文献回顾和荟萃分析旨在确定慢性疼痛人群的条件疼痛调节是否存在功能障碍。选择并回顾了使用标准化方案评估慢性疼痛人群和健康对照组中的条件疼痛调节的研究。最终综述包括了 30 项研究,涵盖了来自 778 名患者和 664 名对照组参与者的数据。在所有研究中,效应大小为.78,反映了患者组中条件疼痛调节的降低。对调节变量的分析表明,参与者的性别和年龄对效应大小有显著影响。结局测量类型、测试刺激类型、条件刺激类型和条件刺激疼痛水平等方法学调节变量没有显著影响。偏倚风险评估表明,评估者的盲法和对混杂变量的控制不足是常见的。结论是,慢性疼痛人群的条件疼痛调节受损。未来的研究应确保患者组和对照组在参与者年龄和性别上充分匹配,评估者获得结局测量结果时应保持盲法,并更严格地控制已知影响调节水平的变量。
本综述比较了慢性疼痛和健康人群中条件疼痛调节的效果。慢性疼痛组中调节受损的发现突出了内源性疼痛调节机制在该人群中的功能障碍。