Suppr超能文献

一项基于社区参与式研究的资助计划:来自哈佛催化剂种子基金的经验教训。

A funding initiative for community-based participatory research: lessons from the Harvard Catalyst Seed Grants.

作者信息

Tendulkar Shalini A, Chu Jocelyn, Opp Jennifer, Geller Alan, Digirolamo Ann, Gandelman Ediss, Grullon Milagro, Patil Pratima, King Stacey, Hacker Karen

机构信息

Institute for Community Health, Cambridge Health Alliance, MI, USA.

出版信息

Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Spring;5(1):35-44. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0005.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Institutes of Health-funded Clinical and Translational Science Awards (CTSA) have increasingly focused on community-engaged research and funded investigators for community-based participatory research (CBPR). However, because CBPR is a collaborative process focused on community-identified research topics, the Harvard CTSA and its Community Advisory Board (CERAB) funded community partners through a CBPR initiative.

OBJECTIVES

We describe lessons learned from this seed grants initiative designed to stimulate community-academic CBPR partnerships.

METHODS

The CBPR program of the Harvard CTSA and the CERAB developed this initiative and each round incorporated participant and advisory feedback toward program improvement.

LESSONS LEARNED

Although this initiative facilitated relevant and innovative research, challenges included variable community research readiness, insufficient project time, and difficulties identifying investigators for new partnerships.

CONCLUSION

Seed grants can foster innovative CBPR projects. Similar initiatives should consider preliminary assessments of community research readiness as well as strategies for meaningful academic researcher engagement.

摘要

背景

美国国立卫生研究院资助的临床与转化科学奖(CTSA)越来越关注社区参与研究,并为基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)的研究人员提供资金。然而,由于CBPR是一个专注于社区确定的研究主题的协作过程,哈佛CTSA及其社区咨询委员会(CERAB)通过一项CBPR倡议为社区合作伙伴提供了资金。

目的

我们描述了从这项旨在促进社区-学术CBPR伙伴关系的种子基金倡议中吸取的经验教训。

方法

哈佛CTSA的CBPR项目和CERAB制定了这项倡议,每一轮都纳入了参与者和咨询反馈以改进项目。

经验教训

尽管这项倡议促进了相关和创新研究,但挑战包括社区研究准备程度不一、项目时间不足以及难以确定新伙伴关系的研究人员。

结论

种子基金可以促进创新的CBPR项目。类似的倡议应考虑对社区研究准备程度进行初步评估以及让学术研究人员有意义参与的策略。

相似文献

1
A funding initiative for community-based participatory research: lessons from the Harvard Catalyst Seed Grants.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Spring;5(1):35-44. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0005.
3
Evaluating community-based participatory research to improve community-partnered science and community health.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012 Fall;6(3):289-99. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2012.0049.
4
Characteristics and Practices Within Research Partnerships for Health and Social Equity.
Nurs Res. 2020 Jan/Feb;69(1):51-61. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000399.
5
Lessons Learned from Three Models that Use Small Grants for Building Academic-Community Partnerships for Research.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(2):527-48. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0076.
8
Connecting community with campus to address cancer health disparities: a community grants program model.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2011 Summer;5(2):207-12. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2011.0027.
9
Community engagement strategies in the original and renewal applications for CTSA grant funding.
Clin Transl Sci. 2014 Feb;7(1):38-43. doi: 10.1111/cts.12125. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
10
Walk together children with no wasted steps: community-academic partnering for equal power in NIH proposal development.
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2010 Winter;4(4):263-77. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2010.0013.

引用本文的文献

1
The NCCB Case Example: Reflections on a Successful Fourteen-Year CBPR Partnership.
J Particip Res Methods. 2024;5(2). doi: 10.35844/001c.120896. Epub 2024 Jul 29.
2
Mobilizing community-driven health promotion through community granting programs: a rapid systematic review.
BMC Public Health. 2024 Apr 1;24(1):932. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-18443-8.
4
Implementation of a Community Grant Program to Address Community-Driven Environmental Health Concerns.
Local Environ. 2020;25(11-12):830-848. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2020.1843419. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
5
"Our lab is the community": Defining essential supporting infrastructure in engagement research.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2018 Aug;2(4):228-233. doi: 10.1017/cts.2018.325.
7
Lessons Learned from Three Models that Use Small Grants for Building Academic-Community Partnerships for Research.
J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2016;27(2):527-48. doi: 10.1353/hpu.2016.0076.
8
Community engagement strategies in the original and renewal applications for CTSA grant funding.
Clin Transl Sci. 2014 Feb;7(1):38-43. doi: 10.1111/cts.12125. Epub 2013 Nov 6.
10
A Model for Strengthening Collaborative Research Capacity: Illustrations From the Atlanta Clinical Translational Science Institute.
Health Educ Behav. 2014 Jun;41(3):267-74. doi: 10.1177/1090198113511815. Epub 2013 Dec 5.

本文引用的文献

1
A small grants program to involve communities in research.
J Community Health. 2010 Jun;35(3):294-301. doi: 10.1007/s10900-010-9235-8.
2
Creating community-based participatory research in a diverse community: a case study.
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2008 Jun;3(2):5-16. doi: 10.1525/jer.2008.3.2.5.
3
The CITRA pilot studies program: mentoring translational research.
Gerontologist. 2007 Dec;47(6):845-50. doi: 10.1093/geront/47.6.845.
5
Clinical research at a crossroads: the NIH roadmap.
J Investig Med. 2006 May;54(4):171-3. doi: 10.2310/6650.2006.X0016.
7
Overcoming barriers to effective community-based participatory research in US medical schools.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2004 Jul;17(2):141-51. doi: 10.1080/13576280410001710969.
8
Community-based participatory research: implications for public health funding.
Am J Public Health. 2003 Aug;93(8):1210-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.93.8.1210.
9
Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise.
JAMA. 2003 Mar 12;289(10):1278-87. doi: 10.1001/jama.289.10.1278.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验