• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

挪威的护理工作就业成本。

The employment costs of caregiving in Norway.

作者信息

Kotsadam Andreas

机构信息

Norwegian Social Research, Elisenberg, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2012 Dec;12(4):269-83. doi: 10.1007/s10754-012-9116-z. Epub 2012 Sep 16.

DOI:10.1007/s10754-012-9116-z
PMID:22983822
Abstract

Informal eldercare is an important pillar of modern welfare states and the ongoing demographic transition increases the demand for it while social trends reduce the supply. Substantial opportunity costs of informal eldercare in terms of forgone labor opportunities have been identified, yet the effects seem to differ substantially across states and there is a controversy on the effects in the Nordic welfare states. In this study, the effects of informal care on the probability of being employed, the number of hours worked, and wages in Norway are analyzed using data from the Life cOurse, Generation, and Gender survey. New and previously suggested instrumental variables are used to control for the potential endogeneity existing between informal care and employment-related outcomes. In total, being an informal caregiver in Norway is found to entail substantially less costs in terms of forgone formal employment opportunities than in non-Nordic welfare states.

摘要

非正式老年护理是现代福利国家的重要支柱,当前的人口结构转变增加了对其的需求,而社会趋势却减少了供给。已确定非正式老年护理在放弃劳动机会方面存在巨大的机会成本,但其影响在不同国家似乎有很大差异,并且对于北欧福利国家的影响存在争议。在本研究中,利用“生命历程、代际与性别”调查的数据,分析了挪威非正式护理对就业概率、工作时长和工资的影响。使用新的和先前提出的工具变量来控制非正式护理与就业相关结果之间潜在的内生性。总体而言,与非北欧福利国家相比,在挪威成为一名非正式护理者在放弃正式就业机会方面所带来的成本要低得多。

相似文献

1
The employment costs of caregiving in Norway.挪威的护理工作就业成本。
Int J Health Care Finance Econ. 2012 Dec;12(4):269-83. doi: 10.1007/s10754-012-9116-z. Epub 2012 Sep 16.
2
The effect of informal care on work and wages.非正式护理对工作和工资的影响。
J Health Econ. 2013 Jan;32(1):240-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Oct 26.
3
Full-time employment and informal caregiving in the 1980s.20世纪80年代的全职工作与非正式照料
Med Care. 1996 Jun;34(6):524-36. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199606000-00003.
4
Your next of kin or your own career? Caring and working among the 50+ of Europe.你的近亲还是你自己的事业?在欧洲50岁以上人群中照顾与工作。
J Health Econ. 2008 May;27(3):718-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.10.004. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
5
Informal caregiving burden: an overlooked aspect of the lives and health of women transitioning from welfare to employment?非正式照料负担:从福利转向就业的女性生活与健康中一个被忽视的方面?
Public Health Nurs. 2004 Jan-Feb;21(1):24-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1446.2004.21104.x.
6
Migraine headache and labor market outcomes.偏头痛与劳动力市场结果。
Health Econ. 2015 Jun;24(6):659-71. doi: 10.1002/hec.3052. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
7
The opportunity costs of informal care: does gender matter?非正式护理的机会成本:性别有影响吗?
J Health Econ. 2003 Sep;22(5):781-803. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00044-4.
8
Considering Recent Trends in Healthcare Labor Markets in Educational Program Planning in Allied Health.在联合健康领域的教育项目规划中考虑医疗保健劳动力市场的近期趋势。
J Allied Health. 2017 Fall;46(3):197-202.
9
Does Formal Employment Reduce Informal Caregiving?正规就业会减少非正规照料吗?
Health Econ. 2016 Jul;25(7):829-43. doi: 10.1002/hec.3185. Epub 2015 May 28.
10
Variations in labor supply between female and male hospital physicians: results from a modern welfare state.女性和男性医院医生之间劳动力供给的差异:来自现代福利国家的结果。
Health Policy. 2012 Sep;107(1):74-82. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2012.05.009. Epub 2012 Jun 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Aging, Dependence, and Long-Term Care: A Systematic Review of Employment Creation.老龄化、依赖和长期护理:就业创造的系统评价。
Inquiry. 2021 Jan-Dec;58:469580211062426. doi: 10.1177/00469580211062426.
2
Transitions in Labour Force Participation over the Palliative Care Trajectory.劳动力参与在姑息治疗轨迹中的转变。
Healthc Policy. 2020 Nov;16(2):25-40. doi: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26355.
3
New Evidence on Employment Effects of Informal Care Provision in Europe.欧洲非正规护理提供的就业效应的新证据。

本文引用的文献

1
Who will care? Employment participation and willingness to supply informal care.谁来照顾?就业参与和提供非正式护理的意愿。
J Health Econ. 2010 Jan;29(1):182-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.11.003. Epub 2009 Nov 13.
2
Does informal care from children to their elderly parents substitute for formal care in Europe?在欧洲,子女对年迈父母的非正式照料是否能替代正式照料?
J Health Econ. 2009 Jan;28(1):143-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2008.09.002. Epub 2008 Sep 13.
3
Informal and formal care among single-living elderly in Europe.欧洲独居老年人的非正式和正式照料情况。
Health Serv Res. 2018 Aug;53(4):2027-2046. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.12840. Epub 2018 Feb 22.
4
Feeling the squeeze? The effects of combining work and informal caregiving on psychological well-being.感到压力重重?工作与非正式护理相结合对心理健康的影响。
Eur J Ageing. 2014 May 3;12(1):51-60. doi: 10.1007/s10433-014-0315-y. eCollection 2015 Mar.
Health Econ. 2008 Mar;17(3):393-409. doi: 10.1002/hec.1275.
4
Informal care and Medicare expenditures: testing for heterogeneous treatment effects.非正式护理与医疗保险支出:异质性治疗效果检验
J Health Econ. 2008 Jan;27(1):134-56. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2007.03.002. Epub 2007 Mar 18.
5
The earnings of informal carers: wage differentials and opportunity costs.非正式护理人员的收入:工资差异与机会成本。
J Health Econ. 2007 Jul 1;26(4):821-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.12.009. Epub 2007 Jan 12.
6
The chicken or the egg? Endogeneity in labour market participation of informal carers in England.鸡生蛋还是蛋生鸡?英国非正式护理人员劳动力市场参与中的内生性问题。
J Health Econ. 2007 May 1;26(3):536-59. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.10.005. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
7
Informal care and health care use of older adults.老年人的非正式照料与医疗保健利用情况
J Health Econ. 2004 Nov;23(6):1159-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.04.008.
8
The opportunity costs of informal care: does gender matter?非正式护理的机会成本:性别有影响吗?
J Health Econ. 2003 Sep;22(5):781-803. doi: 10.1016/S0167-6296(03)00044-4.
9
The labour market costs of community care.社区护理的劳动力市场成本。
J Health Econ. 1998 Dec;17(6):747-65. doi: 10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00036-2.