Suppr超能文献

医疗机构之间重症监护使用情况的差异。

Hospital-level variation in the use of intensive care.

机构信息

Departments of Critical Care and Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Core Faculty, Clinical Research, Investigation, and Systems Modeling of Acute Illness (CRISMA) Center, 639 Scaife Hall 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.

出版信息

Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct;47(5):2060-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01402.x. Epub 2012 Mar 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the extent to which hospitals vary in the use of intensive care, and the proportion of variation attributable to differences in hospital practice that is independent of known patient and hospital factors.

DATA SOURCE

Hospital discharge data in the State Inpatient Database for Maryland and Washington States in 2006.

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis of 90 short-term, acute care hospitals with critical care capabilities. DATA COLLECTION/METHODS: We quantified the proportion of variation in intensive care use attributable to hospitals using intraclass correlation coefficients derived from mixed-effects logistic regression models after successive adjustment for known patient and hospital factors.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

The proportion of hospitalized patients admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU) across hospitals ranged from 3 to 55 percent (median 12 percent; IQR: 9, 17 percent). After adjustment for patient factors, 19.7 percent (95 percent CI: 15.1, 24.4) of total variation in ICU use across hospitals was attributable to hospitals. When observed hospital characteristics were added, the proportion of total variation in intensive care use attributable to unmeasured hospital factors decreased by 26-14.6 percent (95 percent CI: 11, 18.3 percent).

CONCLUSIONS

Wide variability exists in the use of intensive care across hospitals, not attributable to known patient or hospital factors, and may be a target to improve efficiency and quality of critical care.

摘要

目的

确定医院在重症监护使用方面的差异程度,以及这种差异在多大程度上归因于独立于已知患者和医院因素的医院实践差异。

数据来源

2006 年马里兰州和华盛顿州住院患者数据库中的医院出院数据。

研究设计

对具有重症监护能力的 90 家短期急性护理医院进行的横断面分析。

数据收集/方法:我们使用混合效应逻辑回归模型得出的组内相关系数,在对已知患者和医院因素进行连续调整后,量化了重症监护使用差异中归因于医院的比例。

主要发现

医院住院患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)的比例从 3%到 55%不等(中位数 12%;IQR:9%,17%)。在调整患者因素后,医院间 ICU 使用总变异的 19.7%(95%置信区间:15.1%,24.4%)归因于医院。当观察到医院特征时,重症监护使用总变异中归因于未测量医院因素的比例降低了 26-14.6%(95%置信区间:11%,18.3%)。

结论

医院之间在重症监护的使用方面存在很大差异,这归因于未知的患者或医院因素,并且可能是提高重症监护效率和质量的目标。

相似文献

1
Hospital-level variation in the use of intensive care.医疗机构之间重症监护使用情况的差异。
Health Serv Res. 2012 Oct;47(5):2060-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2012.01402.x. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
5
Variation in Utilization of Intensive Care for Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis.儿科糖尿病酮症酸中毒患者重症监护利用的差异。
J Intensive Care Med. 2020 Nov;35(11):1314-1322. doi: 10.1177/0885066619868972. Epub 2019 Aug 13.

引用本文的文献

2
Intensive care unit admission criteria: a scoping review.重症监护病房收治标准:一项范围综述
J Intensive Care Soc. 2024 Apr 15;25(3):296-307. doi: 10.1177/17511437241246901. eCollection 2024 Aug.

本文引用的文献

1
Imaging studies for low back pain.腰痛的影像学检查
J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2008;22(4):306-11. doi: 10.1080/15360280802537332.
5
Ranking hospitals on surgical mortality: the importance of reliability adjustment.医院外科死亡率排名:可靠性调整的重要性。
Health Serv Res. 2010 Dec;45(6 Pt 1):1614-29. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2010.01158.x. Epub 2010 Aug 16.
7
Regional variations in diagnostic practices.诊断实践的地区差异。
N Engl J Med. 2010 Jul 1;363(1):45-53. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa0910881. Epub 2010 May 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验