Suppr超能文献

主要抑郁症的护理质量及其决定因素:多层次分析。

Quality of care for major depression and its determinants: a multilevel analysis.

机构信息

CRCHUM (Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal), Edouard-Asselin Pavilion, 264, René-Lévesque Blvd, East, Montreal, QC, Canada H2X 1P1.

出版信息

BMC Psychiatry. 2012 Sep 17;12:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-12-142.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Numerous studies highlight an important gap in the quality of care for depression in primary care. However, basic indicators were often used. Few of these studies examined factors associated with receiving adequate treatment, particularly with a simultaneous consideration of individual and organizational characteristics. The purpose of this study was to estimate the proportion of primary care patients with a major depressive episode (MDE) who receive adequate treatment and to examine the individual and organizational (i.e., clinic-level) characteristics associated with the receipt of at least one minimally adequate treatment for depression.

METHODS

The sample used for this study included 915 adults consulting a general practitioner (GP), regardless of the motive of consultation, meeting DSM-IV criteria for MDE during the 12 months preceding the survey (T1), and nested within 65 primary care clinics. Data reported in this study were obtained from the "Dialogue" project. Adherence rates for 27 quality indicators selected to cover the most important components of depression treatment were estimated. Multilevel analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Adherence to guidelines was high (>75%) for one third of the quality indicators that were measured but was low (<60%) for nearly half of the measures. Just over half of the sample (52.2%) received at least one minimally adequate treatment for depression. At the individual level, determinants of receipt of minimally adequate care included age, having a family physician, a supplementary insurance coverage, a comorbid anxiety disorder and the severity of depression. At the clinic level, determinants included the availability of psychotherapy on-site, the use of treatment algorithms, and the mode of remuneration.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that interventions are needed to increase the extent to which primary mental health care conforms to evidence-based recommendations. These interventions should target specific populations (i.e. the younger adults and the elderly), enhance accessibility to psychotherapy and to a regular family physician, and support primary care physicians in their clinical practice with patients suffering from depression in different ways such as developing knowledge to treat depression and adapting mode of remuneration.

摘要

背景

许多研究强调了初级保健中抑郁治疗质量的重要差距。然而,这些研究通常使用基本指标。其中很少有研究检查与接受充分治疗相关的因素,特别是同时考虑个人和组织特征。本研究的目的是估计患有重度抑郁发作(MDE)的初级保健患者接受充分治疗的比例,并检查与接受至少一种最低限度充分的抑郁治疗相关的个人和组织(即诊所层面)特征。

方法

本研究使用的样本包括 915 名咨询全科医生(GP)的成年人,无论咨询动机如何,在调查前 12 个月(T1)期间均符合 DSM-IV 重度抑郁发作标准,并嵌套在 65 个初级保健诊所内。本研究报告的数据来自“Dialogue”项目。估计了 27 个质量指标的依从率,这些指标是为涵盖抑郁治疗最重要的组成部分而选择的。进行了多水平分析。

结果

三分之一的测量质量指标的指南遵守率很高(>75%),但近一半的指标的指南遵守率很低(<60%)。超过一半的样本(52.2%)接受了至少一种最低限度充分的抑郁治疗。在个体层面上,接受最低限度充分护理的决定因素包括年龄、有家庭医生、补充保险覆盖、合并焦虑障碍和抑郁严重程度。在诊所层面上,决定因素包括现场提供心理治疗、使用治疗算法以及报酬模式。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,需要采取干预措施来增加初级心理健康护理符合循证建议的程度。这些干预措施应针对特定人群(即年轻成年人和老年人),增加获得心理治疗和常规家庭医生的机会,并以不同方式支持初级保健医生为不同患者(例如,发展治疗抑郁症的知识和适应报酬模式)开展临床实践。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/279f/3544698/dc6d1cdacb17/1471-244X-12-142-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验