• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腰椎管狭窄症患者功能结局的测量指标:伊朗版神经源性跛行结局评分(NCOS)的验证研究。

An outcome measure of functionality in patients with lumber spinal stenosis: a validation study of the Iranian version of Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score (NCOS).

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Shahid Beheshti, University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Neurol. 2012 Sep 24;12:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-101.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2377-12-101
PMID:23006983
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3502137/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Neurogenic claudication (NC) is a common symptom in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS). The Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score (NCOS) is a very short instrument for measuring functional status in these patients. This study aimed to translate and validate the NCOS in Iran.

METHODS

This was a prospective clinical validation study. The 'forward-backward' procedure was applied to translate the NCOS from English into Persian (Iranian language). A total of 84 patients with NC were asked to respond to the questionnaire at two points in time: at preoperative and at postoperative (6 months follow-up) assessments. The Oswestry Disabiltiy Index (ODI) also was completed for patients. To test reliability, the internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha coefficient. Validity was evaluated using known groups comparison and criterion validity (convergent validity). Internal responsiveness of the NCOS to the clinical intervention (surgery) also was assessed comparing patients' pre- and postoperative scores.

RESULTS

The Cronbach's alpha coefficients for the NCOS at preoperative and postoperative assessments were 0.77 and 0.91, respectively. Known groups analysis showed satisfactory results. The instrument discriminated well between sub-groups of patients who differed in claudication distance as measured by the Self-Paced Walking Test (SPWT). The change in the ODI after surgery was strongly correlated with change in the NCOS, lending support to its good convergent validity (r = 0.81; P < 0.001). Further analysis also indicated that the questionnaire was responsive to the clinical intervention (surgery) as expected (P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In general, the Iranian version of the NCOS performed well and the findings suggest that it is a reliable and valid measure of functionality in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who are suffering from neurogenic claudication.

摘要

背景

神经源性跛行(NC)是腰椎管狭窄症(LSS)患者的常见症状。神经源性跛行结局评分(NCOS)是一种非常简短的工具,用于测量这些患者的功能状态。本研究旨在将 NCOS 翻译成伊朗语并进行验证。

方法

这是一项前瞻性临床验证研究。采用“前后”程序将 NCOS 从英语翻译成波斯语(伊朗语)。共有 84 名 NC 患者被要求在两个时间点回答问卷:术前和术后(6 个月随访)评估。还为患者完成了 Oswestry 残疾指数(ODI)。为了测试可靠性,通过 Cronbach's alpha 系数评估内部一致性。通过已知组比较和标准有效性(收敛有效性)评估有效性。还通过比较患者术前和术后的评分来评估 NCOS 对临床干预(手术)的内部反应性。

结果

NCOS 在术前和术后评估的 Cronbach's alpha 系数分别为 0.77 和 0.91。已知组分析显示出满意的结果。该工具在 SPWT 测量的跛行距离不同的患者亚组之间具有良好的区分能力。手术后 ODI 的变化与 NCOS 的变化强烈相关,表明其具有良好的收敛有效性(r=0.81;P<0.001)。进一步的分析还表明,问卷如预期的那样对临床干预(手术)有反应(P<0.0001)。

结论

总体而言,伊朗版的 NCOS 表现良好,研究结果表明,它是一种可靠且有效的工具,用于衡量患有神经源性跛行的腰椎管狭窄症患者的功能。

相似文献

1
An outcome measure of functionality in patients with lumber spinal stenosis: a validation study of the Iranian version of Neurogenic Claudication Outcome Score (NCOS).腰椎管狭窄症患者功能结局的测量指标:伊朗版神经源性跛行结局评分(NCOS)的验证研究。
BMC Neurol. 2012 Sep 24;12:101. doi: 10.1186/1471-2377-12-101.
2
Severity of symptoms, physical functioning and satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis: a validation study of the Iranian version of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Score.腰椎管狭窄症患者的症状严重程度、身体功能及满意度:瑞士腰椎管狭窄症评分伊朗版的验证研究
J Neurosurg Sci. 2014 Sep;58(3):177-82.
3
An Iranian Version of the Fukushima Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Scale (FLS-25): A Validation Study.福岛腰椎管狭窄量表(FLS - 25)的伊朗版本:一项验证研究。
Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):243-248. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.243. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
4
Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis--a comparative study.定量评估腰椎管狭窄症所致神经源性间歇性跛行患者的步行能力——一项对比研究。
Spine J. 2012 Feb;12(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
5
Validation and Cross-cultural Adaptation of the Korean Version of the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire in Patients With Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.《Zurich 间歇性跛行问卷》韩文版在腰椎管狭窄症患者中的验证和跨文化调适。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Jan 15;43(2):E105-E110. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002241.
6
Longitudinal construct validity and responsiveness of measures of walking capacity in individuals with lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症患者步行能力测量指标的纵向结构效度和反应性
Spine J. 2014 Sep 1;14(9):1936-43. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.030. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
7
MILD® Is an Effective Treatment for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis with Neurogenic Claudication: MiDAS ENCORE Randomized Controlled Trial.MILD®是治疗神经源性间歇性跛行型腰椎管狭窄症的有效方法:MiDAS ENCORE随机对照试验。
Pain Physician. 2016 May;19(4):229-42.
8
The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.穿梭步行试验、瑞士腰椎管狭窄症问卷、牛津腰椎管狭窄症评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数在腰椎管狭窄症患者评估中的可靠性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Jan 1;27(1):84-91. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200201010-00020.
9
A validation study of the Iranian version of STarT Back Screening Tool (SBST) in lumbar central canal stenosis patients.伊朗版STarT Back筛查工具(SBST)在腰椎中央管狭窄症患者中的验证研究。
J Orthop Sci. 2014 Mar;19(2):213-217. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0506-y. Epub 2013 Dec 17.
10
An outcome measure of functionality and pain in patients with low back disorder: A validation study of the Iranian version of Core Outcome Measures Index.下背部疾病患者功能和疼痛的结局指标:伊朗版核心结局指标指数的验证研究
Asian J Neurosurg. 2015 Jan-Mar;10(1):46. doi: 10.4103/1793-5482.151511.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlation between clinical scoring systems and quantitative MRI parameters in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.退行性腰椎管狭窄症临床评分系统与定量MRI参数之间的相关性
J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2022 Oct 20;35:102050. doi: 10.1016/j.jcot.2022.102050. eCollection 2022 Dec.
2
An Iranian Version of the Fukushima Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Scale (FLS-25): A Validation Study.福岛腰椎管狭窄量表(FLS - 25)的伊朗版本:一项验证研究。
Asian Spine J. 2017 Apr;11(2):243-248. doi: 10.4184/asj.2017.11.2.243. Epub 2017 Apr 12.
3
Lumbar Spinal Canal Stenosis Classification Criteria: A New Tool.

本文引用的文献

1
Quantification of walking ability in subjects with neurogenic claudication from lumbar spinal stenosis--a comparative study.定量评估腰椎管狭窄症所致神经源性间歇性跛行患者的步行能力——一项对比研究。
Spine J. 2012 Feb;12(2):101-9. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2011.12.006. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
2
Validity and reproducibility of self-report measures of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症患者行走能力自评量表的有效性和可重复性。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Nov 1;35(23):2097-102. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181f5e13b.
3
Qualitative grading of severity of lumbar spinal stenosis based on the morphology of the dural sac on magnetic resonance images.
腰椎管狭窄症分类标准:一种新工具。
Asian Spine J. 2015 Jun;9(3):399-406. doi: 10.4184/asj.2015.9.3.399. Epub 2015 Jun 8.
基于磁共振图像硬膜囊形态的腰椎管狭窄严重程度的定性分级。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 Oct 1;35(21):1919-24. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d359bd.
4
Lumbar spinal stenosis: prognostic factors for bilateral microsurgical decompression using a unilateral approach.腰椎管狭窄症:单侧入路双侧显微减压的预后因素。
Neurosurgery. 2009 Dec;65(6 Suppl):182-7; discussion187. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000341906.65696.08.
5
A criterion measure of walking capacity in lumbar spinal stenosis and its comparison with a treadmill protocol.一种用于腰椎椎管狭窄症的步行能力的标准测量方法及其与跑步机方案的比较。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Oct 15;34(22):2444-9. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b03fc8.
6
Assessment and management of neurogenic claudication associated with lumbar spinal stenosis in a UK primary care musculoskeletal service: a survey of current practice among physiotherapists.在英国初级保健肌肉骨骼服务中,对与腰椎椎管狭窄相关的神经性跛行进行评估和管理:对物理治疗师当前实践的调查。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 Oct 1;10:121. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-121.
7
Microsurgical bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis including degenerative spondylolisthesis.经单侧入路显微外科双侧减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症,包括退行性腰椎滑脱症。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2008 Dec;9(6):554-9. doi: 10.3171/SPI.2008.8.08122.
8
[An orthotic (lordotic) caudal syndrome].[一种矫形(脊柱前凸)尾端综合征]
Acta Psychiatr Neurol. 1948;23(1-2):57-68.
9
Outcomes of decompression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis based upon preoperative radiographic severity.基于术前影像学严重程度的腰椎管狭窄减压术的疗效
J Orthop Surg Res. 2007 Mar 8;2:3. doi: 10.1186/1749-799X-2-3.
10
The Oswestry Disability Index, the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: translation and validation studies of the Iranian versions.奥斯威斯瑞残疾指数、罗兰-莫里斯残疾问卷及魁北克背痛残疾量表:伊朗版本的翻译与验证研究
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Jun 15;31(14):E454-9. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000222141.61424.f7.