• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面向医疗保健的教育资源可读性分析:来自美国面部整形与重建外科学会

Readability analysis of healthcare-oriented education resources from the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey 07103, USA.

出版信息

Laryngoscope. 2013 Jan;123(1):90-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.23574. Epub 2012 Sep 28.

DOI:10.1002/lary.23574
PMID:23023924
Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Deficient health literacy remains a widespread public issue. As such, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) recommends that all patient resources should be written around a sixth-grade level. The authors evaluate healthcare-oriented resources specified for patient use on the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery (AAFPRS) Web site in order to identify potential areas of improvement and highlight those sections that may serve as paradigms for future revisions.

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive and correlational design.

METHODS

Seventeen healthcare-oriented resources specifically for patients were downloaded in February 2012 from the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Web site. Readability assessments of each article were performed using Readability Studio Professional Edition Version 2012.1. These tests included the Flesch Reading Ease, Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level, SMOG Grading, Coleman-Liau Index, Gunning-Fog Index, the New Fog Count, the New Dale-Chall Readability Formula, FORCAST formula, Raygor Readability Estimate, and the Fry Graph.

RESULTS

Patient health education material found on the AAFPRS Web site has been found to be written at an average grade level of 12th grade using 10 different readability scales.

CONCLUSIONS

Modifications of the patient education section of the AAFPRS Web site can increase the readability of the literature, and allow greater comprehension among a wider audience.

摘要

目的/假设:健康素养不足仍是一个普遍存在的公众问题。因此,美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)建议所有患者资源的书写应围绕六年级水平。作者评估了美国面部整形重建外科学会(AAFPRS)网站上专为患者使用指定的面向医疗保健的资源,以确定潜在的改进领域,并突出那些可能作为未来修订范例的部分。

研究设计

描述性和相关性设计。

方法

2012 年 2 月,从美国面部整形重建外科学会网站下载了 17 种专为患者提供的面向医疗保健的资源。使用 Readability Studio Professional Edition Version 2012.1 对每篇文章的可读性进行评估。这些测试包括 Flesch 阅读舒适度、Flesch-Kincaid 年级水平、SMOG 分级、Coleman-Liau 指数、Gunning-Fog 指数、新 Fog 计数、新 Dale-Chall 可读性公式、FORCAST 公式、Raygor 可读性估计和 Fry 图。

结果

在 AAFPRS 网站上发现的患者健康教育材料的平均阅读水平为 12 年级,使用了 10 种不同的可读性量表。

结论

修改 AAFPRS 网站上的患者教育部分可以提高文献的可读性,使更广泛的受众更容易理解。

相似文献

1
Readability analysis of healthcare-oriented education resources from the American Academy of Facial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.面向医疗保健的教育资源可读性分析:来自美国面部整形与重建外科学会
Laryngoscope. 2013 Jan;123(1):90-6. doi: 10.1002/lary.23574. Epub 2012 Sep 28.
2
Assessment of online patient education materials from major ophthalmologic associations.主要眼科协会在线患者教育材料评估。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2015 Apr;133(4):449-54. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.6104.
3
Readability assessment of the American Rhinologic Society patient education materials.美国鼻科学会患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2013 Apr;3(4):325-33. doi: 10.1002/alr.21097. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
4
Are we effectively informing patients? A quantitative analysis of on-line patient education resources from the American Society of Neuroradiology.我们是否有效地告知了患者?对美国神经放射学会在线患者教育资源的定量分析。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Jul;35(7):1270-5. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A3854. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
5
Readability assessment of online patient resources for breast augmentation surgery.隆胸手术在线患者资源的可读性评估。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015 Jun;135(6):1573-1579. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000001230.
6
Readability Assessment of Online Patient Abdominoplasty Resources.在线腹部整形手术患者资源的可读性评估。
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2015 Feb;39(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0425-0. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
7
Readability assessment of patient education materials from the American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.美国耳鼻喉科学-头颈外科学会患者教育材料的可读性评估。
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Sep;147(3):466-71. doi: 10.1177/0194599812442783. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
8
Readability Analysis of the American Society of Ophthalmic Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Patient Educational Brochures.美国眼整形重建外科学会患者教育手册可读性分析。
Semin Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan 2;37(1):77-82. doi: 10.1080/08820538.2021.1919721. Epub 2021 May 11.
9
Health literacy and online educational resources: an opportunity to educate patients.健康素养和在线教育资源:教育患者的机会。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Jan;204(1):111-6. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.13086.
10
Health Literacy: Readability of ACC/AHA Online Patient Education Material.健康素养:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会在线患者教育资料的可读性
Cardiology. 2017;138(1):36-40. doi: 10.1159/000475881. Epub 2017 Jun 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Readability, Reliability, and Quality Analysis of Internet-Based Patient Education Materials and Large Language Models on Meniere's Disease.基于互联网的梅尼埃病患者教育材料和大语言模型的可读性、可靠性及质量分析
J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2025 Jan-Dec;54:19160216251360651. doi: 10.1177/19160216251360651. Epub 2025 Aug 8.
2
Readability of Patient Education Materials in Plastic Surgery: Assessing 14 Years of Progress.整形外科患者教育材料的可读性:评估14年的进展。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2025 Feb 17;13(2):e6541. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006541. eCollection 2025 Feb.
3
A Comprehensive Analysis on the Readability of Rhinoplasty-Based Web Content for Patients.
基于隆鼻手术的患者网络内容可读性综合分析
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2025 Feb;33(1):107-115. doi: 10.1177/22925503231195018. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
4
Digital Education on Hospital Nutrition Diets: What Do Patients Want to Know?医院营养膳食的数字化教育:患者想知道什么?
Nutrients. 2024 Sep 30;16(19):3314. doi: 10.3390/nu16193314.
5
Health Literacy Analytics of Accessible Patient Resources in Cardiovascular Medicine: What are Patients Wanting to Know?心血管医学中可获取患者资源的健康素养分析:患者想了解什么?
Kans J Med. 2023 Dec 31;16(3):309-315. doi: 10.17161/kjm.vol16.20554. eCollection 2023.
6
A critical readability and quality analysis of internet-based patient information on neck dissections.基于互联网的颈部解剖患者信息的关键可读性与质量分析
World J Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Apr 26;9(1):59-65. doi: 10.1016/j.wjorl.2021.07.001. eCollection 2023 Mar.
7
Health Literacy in Plastic Surgery: A Scoping Review.整形外科学中的健康素养:一项范围综述
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2022 Apr 13;10(4):e4247. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004247. eCollection 2022 Apr.
8
A Multimetric Readability Analysis of Online Patient Educational Materials for Submental Fat Reduction.一项关于颏下脂肪减少的在线患者教育材料多指标可读性分析
Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2022 Apr;46(2):712-718. doi: 10.1007/s00266-021-02675-9. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
9
Internet-Based Patient Education Materials Regarding Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Readability and Quality Assessment.关于糖尿病足溃疡的基于互联网的患者教育材料:可读性和质量评估。
JMIR Diabetes. 2022 Jan 11;7(1):e27221. doi: 10.2196/27221.
10
Detecting Symptom Errors in Neural Machine Translation of Patient Health Information on Depressive Disorders: Developing Interpretable Bayesian Machine Learning Classifiers.检测关于抑郁症的患者健康信息神经机器翻译中的症状错误:开发可解释的贝叶斯机器学习分类器
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Oct 21;12:771562. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.771562. eCollection 2021.