Wang Lin, Zhang Yan, Huang Tianyi, Li Xiang
Adaptive Networks and Control Laboratory, Department of Electronic Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200433, People's Republic of China.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2012 Sep;86(3 Pt 1):032901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.032901. Epub 2012 Sep 24.
With a simple phenomenological metapopulation model, which characterizes the invasion process of an influenza pandemic from a source to a subpopulation at risk, we compare the efficiency of inter- and intrapopulation interventions in delaying the arrival of an influenza pandemic. We take travel restriction and patient isolation as examples, since in reality they are typical control measures implemented at the inter- and intrapopulation levels, respectively. We find that the intrapopulation interventions, e.g., patient isolation, perform better than the interpopulation strategies such as travel restriction if the response time is small. However, intrapopulation strategies are sensitive to the increase of the response time, which might be inevitable due to socioeconomic reasons in practice and will largely discount the efficiency.
通过一个简单的现象学集合种群模型(该模型描述了流感大流行从一个源头向一个有风险的亚种群的传播过程),我们比较了种群间和种群内干预措施在延迟流感大流行到来方面的效率。我们以旅行限制和患者隔离为例,因为在现实中它们分别是在种群间和种群内层面实施的典型控制措施。我们发现,如果响应时间较短,种群内干预措施(例如患者隔离)比旅行限制等种群间策略表现更好。然而,种群内策略对响应时间的增加很敏感,在实际中由于社会经济原因这种增加可能不可避免,并且这将大大降低效率。