• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

严重性检查有助于提高在线研究数据的有效性。

Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research.

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Duesseldorf, Universitaetsstrasse 1, Building 23.03, 40225, Duesseldorf, Germany.

出版信息

Behav Res Methods. 2013 Jun;45(2):527-35. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2.

DOI:10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2
PMID:23055170
Abstract

Nonserious answering behavior increases noise and reduces experimental power; it is therefore one of the most important threats to the validity of online research. A simple way to address the problem is to ask respondents about the seriousness of their participation and to exclude self-declared nonserious participants from analysis. To validate this approach, a survey was conducted in the week prior to the German 2009 federal election to the Bundestag. Serious participants answered a number of attitudinal and behavioral questions in a more consistent and predictively valid manner than did nonserious participants. We therefore recommend routinely employing seriousness checks in online surveys to improve data validity.

摘要

不认真的回答行为会增加噪音并降低实验效力;因此,它是在线研究有效性的最重要威胁之一。解决这个问题的一个简单方法是询问受访者他们参与的认真程度,并将自我宣称不认真的参与者排除在分析之外。为了验证这种方法,我们在德国 2009 年联邦选举前一周进行了一项调查。认真的参与者比不认真的参与者更一致和更具预测性地回答了一些态度和行为问题。因此,我们建议在在线调查中定期进行认真程度检查,以提高数据的有效性。

相似文献

1
Seriousness checks are useful to improve data validity in online research.严重性检查有助于提高在线研究数据的有效性。
Behav Res Methods. 2013 Jun;45(2):527-35. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0265-2.
2
Improving Participants' Experience in the Online Survey Process.改善参与者在在线调查过程中的体验。
J Contin Educ Nurs. 2019 Oct 1;50(10):439-441. doi: 10.3928/00220124-20190917-03.
3
The touro 12-step: a systematic guide to optimizing survey research with online discussion boards.图罗十二步法:利用在线讨论板优化调查研究的系统指南。
J Med Internet Res. 2010 May 27;12(2):e16. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1314.
4
Cyberfaking: I can, so I will? Intentions to fake in online psychological testing.网络造假:我能,所以我会吗?在线心理测试中的造假意图。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2013 May;16(5):364-9. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0271. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
5
Brief assessment of subjective health complaints: Development, validation and population norms of a brief form of the Giessen Subjective Complaints List (GBB-8).主观健康问题的简要评估:吉森主观症状清单简版(GBB - 8)的编制、验证及人群常模
J Psychosom Res. 2017 Apr;95:33-43. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
6
Predicting voting behavior with implicit attitude measures: the 2002 German parliamentary election.运用隐性态度测量预测投票行为:2002年德国议会选举
Exp Psychol. 2007;54(4):247-55. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169.54.4.247.
7
Measurement of health-related quality of life in adult patients with birch pollen-associated food allergy.桦树花粉相关食物过敏成年患者健康相关生活质量的测量
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges. 2016 Apr;14(4):397-404. doi: 10.1111/ddg.12731. Epub 2016 Feb 10.
8
How much do we count? Interpretation and error-making in the decennial census.我们的人口数量有多重要?十年一度人口普查中的解读与误差产生。
Demography. 1999 Feb;36(1):121-34.
9
Development and Validation of a Single-Item Screener for Self-Reporting Sexual Problems in U.S. Adults.美国成年人自我报告性问题单项筛查工具的开发与验证
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Oct;30(10):1468-75. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3333-3. Epub 2015 Apr 18.
10
Enhancing Syndromic Surveillance With Online Respondent-Driven Detection.通过在线应答者驱动检测加强症状监测。
Am J Public Health. 2015 Aug;105(8):e90-7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302717. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Social Network Sites and Well-Being: Is it Only a Matter of Content?社交网站与幸福感:仅仅是内容的问题吗?
Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2023 May 5;36:6. doi: 10.5334/irsp.736. eCollection 2023.
2
Revisiting the Motivated Denial of Mind to Animals Used for Food: Replication Registered Report of Bastian et al. ().重新审视对用于食用动物的心理动机性否认:巴斯蒂安等人()的复制注册报告。
Int Rev Soc Psychol. 2024 Apr 26;37:6. doi: 10.5334/irsp.932. eCollection 2024.
3
Mind the (Social and Emotional Competence) Gap to Support Higher Education Students' Well-Being: Psychometric Properties of the SECAB-A(S).
关注(社会和情感能力)差距以支持高等教育学生的幸福感:SECAB - A(S)的心理测量特性
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Aug 16;15(8):162. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15080162.
4
Dropout analysis: A method for data from Internet-based research and dropR, an R-based web app and package to analyze and visualize dropout.失访分析:一种用于基于互联网研究数据的方法以及dropR,一个用于分析和可视化失访情况的基于R的网络应用程序和软件包。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Jul 18;57(8):231. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02730-2.
5
What makes an individual inclusive of others? Development of the individual inclusiveness inventory.是什么让一个人接纳他人?个体包容性量表的编制。
Front Psychol. 2025 May 7;16:1473120. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1473120. eCollection 2025.
6
Pre-exposure prophylaxis engagement among sexual minority men in Taiwan: a behavioral health perspective.台湾男同性恋者的暴露前预防参与情况:行为健康视角
J Behav Med. 2025 May 10. doi: 10.1007/s10865-025-00572-z.
7
Effect of Partially Automated Driving on Mental Workload, Visual Behavior and Engagement in Nondriving-Related Tasks: A Meta-Analysis.部分自动驾驶对心理负荷、视觉行为及非驾驶相关任务参与度的影响:一项荟萃分析
Hum Factors. 2025 Mar 3;67(9):187208251323132. doi: 10.1177/00187208251323132.
8
Perceived Stress, Well-Being, and Academic Performance of University Students During the First COVID-19 Lockdown: A Study of Portuguese, Spanish, and Brazilian Students.新冠疫情首次封锁期间大学生的感知压力、幸福感与学业表现:对葡萄牙、西班牙和巴西学生的研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Feb 10;13(4):371. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13040371.
9
Examining the Proximal Relationship between Religious Coping and Depression among Trauma-Exposed Adults.探究受过创伤的成年人中宗教应对与抑郁之间的近端关系。
Ment Health Relig Cult. 2024;27(4):313-326. doi: 10.1080/13674676.2024.2357795. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
10
One and only SNARC? Spatial-Numerical Associations are not fully flexible and depend on both relative and absolute number magnitude.独一无二的SNARC效应?空间-数字关联并非完全灵活,而是取决于相对和绝对数字大小。
R Soc Open Sci. 2025 Jan 8;12(1):241585. doi: 10.1098/rsos.241585. eCollection 2025 Jan.