Syazwan Ai, Rafee B Mohd, Juahir Hafizan, Azman Azf, Nizar Am, Izwyn Z, Syahidatussyakirah K, Muhaimin Aa, Yunos Ma Syafiq, Anita Ar, Hanafiah J Muhamad, Shaharuddin Ms, Ibthisham A Mohd, Hasmadi I Mohd, Azhar Mn Mohamad, Azizan Hs, Zulfadhli I, Othman J, Rozalini M, Kamarul Ft
Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Selangor.
Drug Healthc Patient Saf. 2012;4:107-26. doi: 10.2147/DHPS.S33400. Epub 2012 Sep 21.
To analyze and characterize a multidisciplinary, integrated indoor air quality checklist for evaluating the health risk of building occupants in a nonindustrial workplace setting.
A cross-sectional study based on a participatory occupational health program conducted by the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health (Malaysia) and Universiti Putra Malaysia.
A modified version of the indoor environmental checklist published by the Department of Occupational Health and Safety, based on the literature and discussion with occupational health and safety professionals, was used in the evaluation process. Summated scores were given according to the cluster analysis and principal component analysis in the characterization of risk. Environmetric techniques was used to classify the risk of variables in the checklist. Identification of the possible source of item pollutants was also evaluated from a semiquantitative approach.
Hierarchical agglomerative cluster analysis resulted in the grouping of factorial components into three clusters (high complaint, moderate-high complaint, moderate complaint), which were further analyzed by discriminant analysis. From this, 15 major variables that influence indoor air quality were determined. Principal component analysis of each cluster revealed that the main factors influencing the high complaint group were fungal-related problems, chemical indoor dispersion, detergent, renovation, thermal comfort, and location of fresh air intake. The moderate-high complaint group showed significant high loading on ventilation, air filters, and smoking-related activities. The moderate complaint group showed high loading on dampness, odor, and thermal comfort.
This semiquantitative assessment, which graded risk from low to high based on the intensity of the problem, shows promising and reliable results. It should be used as an important tool in the preliminary assessment of indoor air quality and as a categorizing method for further IAQ investigations and complaints procedures.
分析并描述一份多学科综合室内空气质量清单,用于评估非工业工作场所环境中建筑居住者的健康风险。
一项横断面研究,基于马来西亚国家职业安全与健康研究所和马来西亚博特拉大学开展的参与式职业健康项目。
在评估过程中使用了职业健康与安全部发布的室内环境清单的修订版,该版本基于文献以及与职业健康与安全专业人员的讨论。根据聚类分析和主成分分析对风险特征进行评分。采用环境计量技术对清单中的变量风险进行分类。还通过半定量方法评估了项目污染物的可能来源。
层次凝聚聚类分析将因子成分分为三个类别(高投诉、中高投诉、中投诉),并通过判别分析进一步分析。由此确定了影响室内空气质量的15个主要变量。对每个类别的主成分分析表明,影响高投诉组的主要因素是真菌相关问题、化学物质室内扩散、洗涤剂、装修、热舒适度和新鲜空气入口位置。中高投诉组在通风、空气过滤器和吸烟相关活动方面显示出显著的高负荷。中投诉组在潮湿、气味和热舒适度方面显示出高负荷。
这种基于问题严重程度将风险从低到高分级的半定量评估显示出有前景且可靠的结果。它应用作室内空气质量初步评估的重要工具,以及进一步室内空气质量调查和投诉程序的分类方法。