• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients.撰写实施研究资助提案:十大关键要素。
Implement Sci. 2012 Oct 12;7:96. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-96.
2
The art of obtaining grants.获取资助的技巧。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009 Mar 15;66(6):580-7. doi: 10.2146/ajhp070320.
3
Can't We Do Better? A cost-benefit analysis of proposal writing in a competitive funding environment.难道我们不能做得更好吗?在竞争激烈的资金环境中提案撰写的成本效益分析。
PLoS One. 2023 Apr 19;18(4):e0282320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282320. eCollection 2023.
4
Recommendations for Writing Successful Grant Proposals: An Information Synthesis.撰写成功资助申请书的建议:信息综合
Acad Med. 2015 Dec;90(12):1720-5. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000811.
5
Developing robust, sustainable, implementation systems using rigorous, rapid and relevant science.开发强大、可持续的实施系统,采用严谨、快速和相关的科学。
Clin Transl Sci. 2012 Feb;5(1):48-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00383.x. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
6
Enhancing review criteria for dissemination and implementation science grants.加强传播与实施科学资助的评审标准。
Implement Sci Commun. 2023 Feb 21;4(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s43058-023-00399-2.
7
Top ten strategies to enhance grant-writing success.提高科研基金申请成功率的十大策略。
Surgery. 2021 Dec;170(6):1727-1731. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.06.039. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
8
Applying for, reviewing and funding public health research in Germany and beyond.在德国及其他地区申请、评审公共卫生研究项目并提供资金支持。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jun 13;14(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0112-5.
9
Grant application outcomes for biomedical researchers who participated in the National Research Mentoring Network's Grant Writing Coaching Programs.参与国家研究指导网络资助写作指导项目的生物医学研究人员的资助申请结果。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 9;15(11):e0241851. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0241851. eCollection 2020.
10
To apply or not to apply: a survey analysis of grant writing costs and benefits.申请还是不申请:关于科研基金申请成本与收益的调查分析
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 4;10(3):e0118494. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118494. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing exercise and self-management for women with breast cancer during treatment: results of the NEXT-BRCA randomized controlled trial.对乳腺癌女性患者在治疗期间实施运动与自我管理:NEXT-BRCA随机对照试验的结果
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 18;15(1):26055. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-11660-0.
2
The use of implementation science theoretical approaches in hybrid effectiveness-implementation type 1 randomised trials of healthcare interventions: A scoping review.实施科学理论方法在医疗保健干预措施的混合效果-实施类型1随机试验中的应用:一项范围综述。
Implement Sci. 2025 May 16;20(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13012-025-01435-6.
3
Implementing physical activity for individuals with cancer during treatment: protocol for the IMPACT implementation-effectiveness trial.在治疗期间为癌症患者实施体育活动:IMPACT实施-有效性试验方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Mar 27;15(3):e101013. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-101013.
4
How theories, models, and frameworks have been used to implement digital health interventions in services for people with severe mental health problems: a scoping review.理论、模型和框架如何被用于为严重精神健康问题患者提供的服务中实施数字健康干预措施:一项范围综述
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 17;25(1):1023. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22189-2.
5
Harnessing Implementation Science in Clinical Psychology: Past, Present, and Future.临床心理学中实施科学的应用:过去、现在与未来
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2025 May;21(1):529-555. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-081423-021727. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
6
Experience of a tertiary acute care hospital in Southeast Asia in initiating patient engagement with the aid of digital solutions.东南亚一家三级急症护理医院借助数字解决方案启动患者参与的经验。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Oct 1;4:1416386. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1416386. eCollection 2024.
7
What methods are currently available for incorporating implementation considerations within the economic evaluation of health technologies? A scoping review.目前有哪些方法可将实施因素纳入卫生技术的经济评价中? 范围综述。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2024 Sep 30;22(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s12961-024-01220-9.
8
Recommendations for Writing a National Institutes of Health Individual Predoctoral Fellowship (F31) Training Grant in Dissemination and Implementation Science.撰写美国国立卫生研究院个人博士前奖学金(F31)传播与实施科学培训资助申请书的建议。
Glob Implement Res Appl. 2023 Sep;3(3):299-310. doi: 10.1007/s43477-023-00096-1. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
9
A cluster randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of the 'Caring for Providers to Improve Patient Experience' (CPIPE) intervention in Kenya and Ghana: study protocol.一项在肯尼亚和加纳评估“关爱提供者以改善患者体验”(CPIPE)干预措施影响的整群随机对照试验:研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Sep 16;24(1):2509. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-20023-9.
10
Competing for research funding: Key elements impacting the evaluation of grant proposal.争夺研究资金:影响科研项目申请书评估的关键因素
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 10;10(16):e36015. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36015. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.

本文引用的文献

1
The U.S. training institute for dissemination and implementation research in health.美国卫生传播与实施研究培训机构。
Implement Sci. 2013 Jan 24;8:12. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-12.
2
Using a logic model to design and evaluate quality and patient safety improvement programs.运用逻辑模型设计和评估质量及患者安全改进项目。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2012 Aug;24(4):330-7. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzs029. Epub 2012 Jun 27.
3
Dynamic adaptation process to implement an evidence-based child maltreatment intervention.动态适应过程以实施基于证据的儿童虐待干预措施。
Implement Sci. 2012 Apr 18;7:32. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-32.
4
Variations in surgical outcomes associated with hospital compliance with safety practices.医院安全实践执行情况与手术结果的变化相关性。
Surgery. 2012 May;151(5):651-9. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.12.001. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
5
A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health.健康和心理健康领域临床创新实施策略汇编。
Med Care Res Rev. 2012 Apr;69(2):123-57. doi: 10.1177/1077558711430690. Epub 2011 Dec 26.
6
Measuring organizational readiness for knowledge translation in chronic care.测量慢性病照护中知识转化的组织准备度。
Implement Sci. 2011 Jul 13;6:72. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-72.
7
The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions.行为改变轮:一种描述和设计行为改变干预措施的新方法。
Implement Sci. 2011 Apr 23;6:42. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-42.
8
Advancing a conceptual model of evidence-based practice implementation in public service sectors.推进公共服务部门循证实践实施的概念模型。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Jan;38(1):4-23. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0327-7.
9
A cross-sectional study of the number and frequency of terms used to refer to knowledge translation in a body of health literature in 2006: a Tower of Babel?2006 年健康文献中用于指代知识转化的术语数量和频率的横断面研究:巴别塔?
Implement Sci. 2010 Feb 12;5:16. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-5-16.
10
Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda.实施研究的结果:概念区别、测量挑战和研究议程。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.

撰写实施研究资助提案:十大关键要素。

Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients.

机构信息

Center for Mental Health Services Research, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University in St, Louis, St, Louis, MO 63130, USA.

出版信息

Implement Sci. 2012 Oct 12;7:96. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-96.

DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-7-96
PMID:23062065
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3541090/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

All investigators seeking funding to conduct implementation research face the challenges of preparing a high-quality proposal and demonstrating their capacity to conduct the proposed study. Applicants need to demonstrate the progressive nature of their research agenda and their ability to build cumulatively upon the literature and their own preliminary studies. Because implementation science is an emerging field involving complex and multilevel processes, many investigators may not feel equipped to write competitive proposals, and this concern is pronounced among early stage implementation researchers.

DISCUSSION

This article addresses the challenges of preparing grant applications that succeed in the emerging field of dissemination and implementation. We summarize ten ingredients that are important in implementation research grants. For each, we provide examples of how preliminary data, background literature, and narrative detail in the application can strengthen the application.

SUMMARY

Every investigator struggles with the challenge of fitting into a page-limited application the research background, methodological detail, and information that can convey the project's feasibility and likelihood of success. While no application can include a high level of detail about every ingredient, addressing the ten ingredients summarized in this article can help assure reviewers of the significance, feasibility, and impact of the proposed research.

摘要

背景

所有寻求资金开展实施研究的研究人员都面临着编写高质量提案并展示其开展拟议研究的能力的挑战。申请人需要证明其研究议程的渐进性,以及他们在文献和自己的初步研究基础上不断积累的能力。由于实施科学是一个涉及复杂和多层次过程的新兴领域,许多研究人员可能觉得自己没有能力编写有竞争力的提案,而这一担忧在早期实施研究人员中更为明显。

讨论

本文讨论了在传播和实施这一新兴领域中编写成功的资助申请所面临的挑战。我们总结了实施研究资助申请中十个重要的要素。对于每个要素,我们提供了在申请中使用初步数据、背景文献和叙述细节来加强申请的示例。

总结

每个研究人员都在努力应对在有限的页面内纳入研究背景、方法细节和能够传达项目可行性和成功可能性的信息的挑战。虽然没有一个申请可以包含每个要素的详细程度,但解决本文总结的十个要素可以帮助评审员了解拟议研究的意义、可行性和影响。