Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602-3013, USA.
Addiction. 2013 Mar;108(3):584-91. doi: 10.1111/add.12014. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
To apply social network analysis (SNA) to investigate whether frequency and severity of gambling problems were associated with different network characteristics among friends, family and co-workers is an innovative way to look at relationships among individuals; the current study was the first, to our knowledge, to apply SNA to gambling behaviors.
Egocentric social network analysis was used to characterize formally the relationships between social network characteristics and gambling pathology.
Laboratory-based questionnaire and interview administration.
Forty frequent gamblers (22 non-pathological gamblers, 18 pathological gamblers) were recruited from the community.
The SNA revealed significant social network compositional differences between the two groups: pathological gamblers (PGs) had more gamblers, smokers and drinkers in their social networks than did non-pathological gamblers (NPGs). PGs had more individuals in their network with whom they personally gambled, smoked and drank than those with who were NPG. Network ties were closer to individuals in their networks who gambled, smoked and drank more frequently. Associations between gambling severity and structural network characteristics were not significant.
Pathological gambling is associated with compositional but not structural differences in social networks. Pathological gamblers differ from non-pathological gamblers in the number of gamblers, smokers and drinkers in their social networks. Homophily within the networks also indicates that gamblers tend to be closer with other gamblers. This homophily may serve to reinforce addictive behaviors, and may suggest avenues for future study or intervention.
应用社交网络分析(SNA)来调查赌博问题的频率和严重程度是否与朋友、家人和同事网络中的不同特征有关,这是一种研究个体间关系的创新方法;据我们所知,本研究首次将 SNA 应用于赌博行为。
采用个体中心的社交网络分析来描述社交网络特征与赌博病理之间的关系。
基于实验室的问卷调查和访谈管理。
从社区招募了 40 名经常赌博者(22 名非病理性赌博者,18 名病理性赌博者)。
SNA 揭示了两组之间存在显著的社交网络组成差异:病理性赌博者(PGs)的社交网络中赌徒、吸烟者和饮酒者比非病理性赌博者(NPGs)更多。PGs 与网络中亲自赌博、吸烟和饮酒的个体之间的网络联系比 NPG 更紧密。网络关系与网络中赌博、吸烟和饮酒更频繁的个体更密切。赌博严重程度与结构网络特征之间没有显著关联。
病理性赌博与社交网络的组成而非结构差异有关。病理性赌博者与非病理性赌博者的社交网络中赌徒、吸烟者和饮酒者的数量存在差异。网络内的同质性也表明赌徒往往与其他赌徒更亲近。这种同质性可能有助于强化成瘾行为,并为未来的研究或干预提供途径。