Department of Psychology, University of Georgia.
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Apr;22(2):176-85. doi: 10.1037/a0035874.
Impulsivity has been consistently associated with pathological gambling (PG), but the diversity of definitions and measures of impulsivity has led to ambiguity with regard to which indices are independently relevant. Toward clarifying this relationship, the current study examined indices from an array of commonly used impulsivity measures in relation to PG severity in an adult community sample of frequent gamblers (N = 353). These included both survey assessments and behavioral tasks. Using a factor analytic approach, 4 latent factors were identified among 19 indices and were designated reward sensitivity, punishment sensitivity, delay discounting, and cognitive impulsivity. All 4 latent variables were positively and independently related to PG severity, albeit at a trend level for cognitive impulsivity in a combined model. These findings reveal 4 generally independent domains of impulsivity that are related to PG severity, clarify which assessment measures aggregate in each domain, and illustrate the importance of measurement specificity in studying impulsivity in relation to PG and other psychiatric disorders.
冲动性一直与病理性赌博(PG)有关,但由于冲动性的定义和测量方法多种多样,导致哪些指标是独立相关的存在歧义。为了澄清这种关系,本研究在一个经常赌博的成年社区样本(N=353)中,检查了一系列常用冲动性测量方法中的指标与 PG 严重程度的关系。这些指标包括问卷调查和行为任务。使用因子分析方法,从 19 个指标中确定了 4 个潜在因素,分别命名为奖励敏感性、惩罚敏感性、延迟折扣和认知冲动性。虽然在综合模型中,认知冲动性仅呈趋势性相关,但所有 4 个潜在变量均与 PG 严重程度呈正相关且独立相关。这些发现揭示了与 PG 严重程度相关的 4 个一般独立的冲动性领域,澄清了每个领域中聚合的评估测量方法,并说明了在研究冲动性与 PG 和其他精神障碍的关系时,测量特异性的重要性。