• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颜色-单词匹配斯特鲁普任务与停止信号任务之间的关系:迈向对儿童注意力和抑制能力的多方面评估

Relationships between the color-word matching Stroop task and the Go/NoGo task: toward multifaceted assessment of attention and inhibition abilities of children.

作者信息

Morooka Teruko, Ogino Tatsuya, Takeuchi Akihito, Hanafusa Kaoru, Oka Makio, Ohtsuka Yoko

机构信息

Department of Child Neurology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama 700-8558, Japan.

出版信息

Acta Med Okayama. 2012;66(5):377-86. doi: 10.18926/AMO/49385.

DOI:10.18926/AMO/49385
PMID:23093056
Abstract

Both selective attention and response inhibition can be assessed through the Stroop task and the Go/NoGo task (Go/NoGo). The color-word matching Stroop task (cwmStroop) differs from the traditional Stroop task in ways that make it easy to administer, and it enables the examiners to analyze reaction time. It is expected that the cwmStroop and Go/NoGo tasks will be useful as clinical assessments for children with developmental disorders and in combination with functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. The objectives of this study were to elucidate the pattern of developmental change in cwmStroop scores and Go/NoGo scores and to determine whether and how cwmStroop scores are related to Go/NoGo scores. The subjects consisted of 108 healthy Japanese children aged 6-14 years. We found that cwmStroop and Go/NoGo scores displayed clear developmental changes between 6 and 14 years of age. The children's scores on the 2 tasks followed different developmental courses, however, and the correlation between scores on the two tasks was weak on the whole. These results indicate that the cwmStroop and Go/NoGo tasks tap different aspects of selective attention and response inhibition. Therefore it is expected that the combination of both tests will be useful in the multifaceted assessment of selective attention and response inhibition in childhood.

摘要

选择性注意和反应抑制都可以通过斯特鲁普任务(Stroop task)和“Go/NoGo”任务(Go/NoGo)来评估。颜色-单词匹配斯特鲁普任务(cwmStroop)在某些方面与传统斯特鲁普任务不同,这些不同之处使得它易于实施,并且能让检查者分析反应时间。预计cwmStroop任务和“Go/NoGo”任务将作为对发育障碍儿童的临床评估手段,并与功能磁共振成像研究相结合使用。本研究的目的是阐明cwmStroop分数和“Go/NoGo”分数的发育变化模式,并确定cwmStroop分数是否以及如何与“Go/NoGo”分数相关。研究对象包括108名6至14岁的健康日本儿童。我们发现,cwmStroop分数和“Go/NoGo”分数在6至~14岁之间呈现出明显的发育变化。然而,儿童在这两项任务上的分数遵循不同的发育过程,而且两项任务分数之间的相关性总体较弱。这些结果表明,cwmStroop任务和“Go/NoGo”任务涉及选择性注意和反应抑制的不同方面。因此,预计这两项测试的组合将有助于对儿童期选择性注意和反应抑制进行多方面评估。

相似文献

1
Relationships between the color-word matching Stroop task and the Go/NoGo task: toward multifaceted assessment of attention and inhibition abilities of children.颜色-单词匹配斯特鲁普任务与停止信号任务之间的关系:迈向对儿童注意力和抑制能力的多方面评估
Acta Med Okayama. 2012;66(5):377-86. doi: 10.18926/AMO/49385.
2
Response competition and response inhibition during different choice-discrimination tasks: evidence from ERP measured inside MRI scanner.不同选择辨别任务中的反应竞争和反应抑制:来自 MRI 扫描仪内测量的 ERP 的证据。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2013 Jul;89(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.04.021. Epub 2013 May 9.
3
Age-related trends of interference control in school-age children and young adults in the Stroop color-word test.学龄儿童和年轻人在斯特鲁普颜色-文字测试中干扰控制的年龄相关趋势。
Psychol Rep. 2011 Apr;108(2):577-84. doi: 10.2466/04.10.22.PR0.108.2.577-584.
4
The development of preparation, conflict monitoring and inhibition from early childhood to young adulthood: a Go/Nogo ERP study.从幼儿期到青年期准备、冲突监测和抑制功能的发展:一项Go/Nogo事件相关电位研究
Brain Res. 2006 Jun 30;1097(1):181-93. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.04.064. Epub 2006 May 26.
5
Response inhibition and interference control in children with AD/HD: a visual ERP investigation.注意缺陷多动障碍儿童的反应抑制与干扰控制:一项视觉事件相关电位研究
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 May;72(2):145-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2008.11.007. Epub 2008 Dec 3.
6
Are you able not to react to what you hear? Inhibition behavior measured with an auditory Go/NoGo paradigm.你能对听到的内容不做出反应吗?用听觉Go/NoGo范式测量抑制行为。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2017 Feb;39(1):58-71. doi: 10.1080/13803395.2016.1201461. Epub 2016 Jul 13.
7
Dysfunctional response preparation and inhibition during a visual Go/No-go task in children with two subtypes of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder.注意缺陷多动障碍两种亚型儿童在视觉“是/否”任务中的反应准备和抑制功能障碍。
Psychiatry Res. 2009 Apr 30;166(2-3):223-37. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2008.03.005. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
8
Inhibitory mechanisms involved in Stroop-matching and stop-signal tasks and the role of impulsivity.与斯特鲁普匹配和停止信号任务相关的抑制机制以及冲动性的作用。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2018 Nov;191:234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
9
Sequence effects in the Go/NoGo task: inhibition and facilitation.Go/NoGo 任务中的序列效应:抑制和促进。
Int J Psychophysiol. 2009 Dec;74(3):209-19. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2009.09.002. Epub 2009 Sep 12.
10
Task switching and shifting between stopping and going: Developmental change in between-trial control adjustments.任务切换和停止与启动之间的转换:试验间控制调整中的发展变化。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2011 Mar;108(3):484-503. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Individuals recently abstinent from methamphetamine show selective cognitive and behavioral differences when compared to age-matched controls.与年龄匹配的对照组相比,近期戒除甲基苯丙胺的个体表现出选择性的认知和行为差异。
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 11;16:1604252. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1604252. eCollection 2025.
2
Within-subject reliability, occasion specificity, and validity of fluctuations of the Stroop and go/no-go tasks in ecological momentary assessment.生态瞬时评估中Stroop任务和停止-继续任务波动的受试者内信度、情境特异性及效度
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 28;57(1):29. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02567-1.
3
Cognitive and Affective Empathy Relate Differentially to Emotion Regulation.
认知共情和情感共情与情绪调节的关系存在差异。
Affect Sci. 2022;3(1):118-134. doi: 10.1007/s42761-021-00062-w. Epub 2021 Nov 15.
4
Neuropsychological Research in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Current Status and Future Directions.强迫症的神经心理学研究:现状与未来方向
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 1;12:721601. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.721601. eCollection 2021.
5
Electrophysiological Evidence of Anticipatory Cognitive Control in the Stroop Task.斯特鲁普任务中预期认知控制的电生理证据。
Brain Sci. 2021 Jun 13;11(6):783. doi: 10.3390/brainsci11060783.
6
Acute alcohol does not impair attentional inhibition as measured with Stroop interference scores but impairs Stroop performance.急性酒精摄入不会损害斯特鲁普干扰分数所测量的注意力抑制,但会损害斯特鲁普表现。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2021 Jun;238(6):1593-1607. doi: 10.1007/s00213-021-05792-0. Epub 2021 Mar 4.
7
Effect of Baduanjin exercise on cognitive function in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.八段锦锻炼对轻度认知障碍老年人认知功能的影响:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2016 Apr 11;6(4):e010602. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010602.