Suppr超能文献

使用自我调节咨询辅助工具的干预效果评估:OPTIMAHL 60plus 研究的干预前后结果。

Evaluation of an intervention using a self-regulatory counselling aid: pre- and post- intervention results of the OPTIMAHL 60plus study.

机构信息

BIPS-Institute for Epidemiology and Prevention Research GmbH, Bremen, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Public Health. 2013 Jun;58(3):449-58. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0420-7. Epub 2012 Oct 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The study covers development and evaluation of an innovative counselling aid in an intervention study. The main purpose of the study was to establish whether improvements in nutrition and physical activity behaviour according to standard recommendations can be demonstrated.

METHODS

OPTIMAHL 60plus is a quasi-experimental study in which participants were assigned in clusters to an intervention or control group. The study was conducted in low socio-economic-status districts in Bremen, Germany. 423 elderly participated at baseline and 369 after 3 months intervention. Face-to-face interviews (24-h recall and frequency questionnaire) were conducted at T0 and T1. χ (2)-tests, sign-test and logistic regression were used for statistical analyses.

RESULTS

No significant differences could be shown when comparing the intervention versus control group at T1. Significant changes from T0 to T1 in the intervention group were identified for daily fruit and vegetable (χ (2)-test, p = 0.04), and for weekly fish consumption (χ (2)-test, p = 0.04). However, similar results could also be shown for the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

A practical counselling aid for elderly was developed and evaluated. Changes in the health behaviour of elderly were identified, but effects could not be clearly traced to the intervention.

摘要

目的

本研究涵盖了干预研究中创新咨询辅助工具的开发和评估。该研究的主要目的是确定是否可以根据标准建议改善营养和身体活动行为。

方法

OPTIMAHL 60plus 是一项准实验研究,参与者按群组分配到干预组或对照组。该研究在德国不来梅的社会经济地位较低的地区进行。423 名老年人在基线时和 3 个月干预后参与了研究。在 T0 和 T1 时进行了面对面访谈(24 小时回忆和频率问卷)。使用 χ(2)-检验、符号检验和逻辑回归进行统计分析。

结果

在 T1 时,干预组与对照组之间没有显示出显著差异。干预组在 T0 到 T1 期间,每日水果和蔬菜摄入量(χ(2)-检验,p=0.04)和每周鱼类摄入量(χ(2)-检验,p=0.04)有显著变化。然而,对照组也显示出了类似的结果。

结论

为老年人开发并评估了一种实用的咨询辅助工具。确定了老年人健康行为的变化,但效果无法明确追溯到干预。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验