Department of Public and Occupational Health, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Occup Environ Med. 2012 Jul;69(7):500-7. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100377. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
To evaluate the effectiveness of a draft occupational health practice guideline aimed at preventing weight gain on employees' physical activity, sedentary behaviour and dietary behaviour and on body weight-related outcomes.
A randomised controlled trial was performed comparing guideline-based care to usual care among 16 occupational physicians and 523 employees in the Netherlands between 2009 and 2011. Occupational physicians in the intervention group followed the draft guideline by providing advice to employers on how to assess and intervene on the obesogenic work environment and conducted five face-to-face behavioural change counselling sessions with employees to improve their lifestyle. Data of employees were collected by questionnaire and physical measurements at baseline and 6-months follow-up. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine effects.
The intervention showed significant effects on sedentary behaviour at work (β -28 min/day, 95% CI -2 to -54) and on fruit intake (β 2.1 pieces/week; 95% CI 0.6 to 3.6). No significant intervention effects were found for physical activity, sedentary behaviour in leisure time or during weekend days, snack intake and body weight-related outcomes.
Guideline-based care resulted in a more favourable sedentary behaviour at work and increased fruit intake but did not improve employees' physical activity, snack intake or body weight-related outcomes. Trial registration number ISRCTN/73545254 and NTR/1190.
评估一项针对预防员工体重增加的职业健康实践指南草案的有效性,该指南针对员工的身体活动、久坐行为和饮食行为以及与体重相关的结果。
2009 年至 2011 年间,在荷兰,16 名职业医生和 523 名员工参与了一项随机对照试验,比较了基于指南的护理与常规护理。干预组的职业医生通过为雇主提供如何评估和干预致肥胖工作环境的建议来遵循草案指南,并与员工进行五次面对面的行为改变咨询会议,以改善他们的生活方式。员工的数据通过问卷调查和基线及 6 个月随访时的身体测量收集。进行线性和逻辑回归分析以确定效果。
干预对工作时的久坐行为(β-28 分钟/天,95%CI-2 至-54)和水果摄入量(β 2.1 片/周;95%CI0.6 至 3.6)有显著影响。但干预对体力活动、闲暇时间或周末的久坐行为、零食摄入量以及与体重相关的结果没有显著影响。
基于指南的护理导致工作时的久坐行为更有利,水果摄入量增加,但并未改善员工的体力活动、零食摄入量或与体重相关的结果。试验注册号 ISRCTN/73545254 和 NTR/1190。