• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应用职业健康指南可减少工作中的久坐行为并增加水果摄入量:一项 RCT 的结果。

The application of an occupational health guideline reduces sedentary behaviour and increases fruit intake at work: results from an RCT.

机构信息

Department of Public and Occupational Health, The EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Van der Boechorststraat 7, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Occup Environ Med. 2012 Jul;69(7):500-7. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100377. Epub 2012 Mar 1.

DOI:10.1136/oemed-2011-100377
PMID:22383591
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of a draft occupational health practice guideline aimed at preventing weight gain on employees' physical activity, sedentary behaviour and dietary behaviour and on body weight-related outcomes.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial was performed comparing guideline-based care to usual care among 16 occupational physicians and 523 employees in the Netherlands between 2009 and 2011. Occupational physicians in the intervention group followed the draft guideline by providing advice to employers on how to assess and intervene on the obesogenic work environment and conducted five face-to-face behavioural change counselling sessions with employees to improve their lifestyle. Data of employees were collected by questionnaire and physical measurements at baseline and 6-months follow-up. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine effects.

RESULTS

The intervention showed significant effects on sedentary behaviour at work (β -28 min/day, 95% CI -2 to -54) and on fruit intake (β 2.1 pieces/week; 95% CI 0.6 to 3.6). No significant intervention effects were found for physical activity, sedentary behaviour in leisure time or during weekend days, snack intake and body weight-related outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Guideline-based care resulted in a more favourable sedentary behaviour at work and increased fruit intake but did not improve employees' physical activity, snack intake or body weight-related outcomes. Trial registration number ISRCTN/73545254 and NTR/1190.

摘要

目的

评估一项针对预防员工体重增加的职业健康实践指南草案的有效性,该指南针对员工的身体活动、久坐行为和饮食行为以及与体重相关的结果。

方法

2009 年至 2011 年间,在荷兰,16 名职业医生和 523 名员工参与了一项随机对照试验,比较了基于指南的护理与常规护理。干预组的职业医生通过为雇主提供如何评估和干预致肥胖工作环境的建议来遵循草案指南,并与员工进行五次面对面的行为改变咨询会议,以改善他们的生活方式。员工的数据通过问卷调查和基线及 6 个月随访时的身体测量收集。进行线性和逻辑回归分析以确定效果。

结果

干预对工作时的久坐行为(β-28 分钟/天,95%CI-2 至-54)和水果摄入量(β 2.1 片/周;95%CI0.6 至 3.6)有显著影响。但干预对体力活动、闲暇时间或周末的久坐行为、零食摄入量以及与体重相关的结果没有显著影响。

结论

基于指南的护理导致工作时的久坐行为更有利,水果摄入量增加,但并未改善员工的体力活动、零食摄入量或与体重相关的结果。试验注册号 ISRCTN/73545254 和 NTR/1190。

相似文献

1
The application of an occupational health guideline reduces sedentary behaviour and increases fruit intake at work: results from an RCT.应用职业健康指南可减少工作中的久坐行为并增加水果摄入量:一项 RCT 的结果。
Occup Environ Med. 2012 Jul;69(7):500-7. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2011-100377. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
2
Long-term effects of an occupational health guideline on employees' body weight-related outcomes, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and quality of life: results from a randomized controlled trial.一项职业健康指南对员工体重相关结局、心血管疾病风险因素和生活质量的长期影响:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2013 May 1;39(3):284-94. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3341. Epub 2013 Jan 3.
3
Evidence-based lifestyle interventions in the workplace--an overview.基于证据的工作场所生活方式干预措施概述。
Occup Med (Lond). 2014 Jan;64(1):8-12. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqt136. Epub 2013 Nov 26.
4
Design of the Balance@Work project: systematic development, evaluation and implementation of an occupational health guideline aimed at the prevention of weight gain among employees.平衡@工作项目设计:系统开发、评估和实施一项职业健康指南,旨在预防员工体重增加。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Dec 14;9:461. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-461.
5
Moving to business - changes in physical activity and sedentary behavior after multilevel intervention in small and medium-size workplaces.转向商业领域——中小型工作场所多级干预后身体活动和久坐行为的变化。
BMC Public Health. 2017 Apr 17;17(1):319. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4229-4.
6
ALIFE@Work: a randomised controlled trial of a distance counselling lifestyle programme for weight control among an overweight working population [ISRCTN04265725].工作中的健康生活:一项针对超重上班族的体重控制远程咨询生活方式项目的随机对照试验[国际标准随机对照试验编号:ISRCTN04265725]
BMC Public Health. 2006 May 24;6:140. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-140.
7
A worksite vitality intervention to improve older workers' lifestyle and vitality-related outcomes: results of a randomised controlled trial.一项改善老年工人生活方式和活力相关结果的工作场所活力干预:一项随机对照试验的结果。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2012 Nov;66(11):1071-8. doi: 10.1136/jech-2011-200626. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
8
The (cost-)effectiveness of an individually tailored long-term worksite health promotion programme on physical activity and nutrition: design of a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial.一项针对身体活动和营养的个性化长期工作场所健康促进计划的(成本)效益:一项实用的整群随机对照试验的设计
BMC Public Health. 2007 Sep 21;7:259. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-259.
9
Economic evaluation of an occupational health care guideline for prevention of weight gain among employees.预防员工体重增加的职业保健指南的经济评估。
J Occup Environ Med. 2013 Sep;55(9):1100-9. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31829b279a.
10
Study protocol of European Fans in Training (EuroFIT): a four-country randomised controlled trial of a lifestyle program for men delivered in elite football clubs.欧洲球迷参与训练(EuroFIT)研究方案:一项在精英足球俱乐部中针对男性开展的生活方式项目的四国随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2016 Jul 19;16:598. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3255-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Intervention Strategies on Fruit and Vegetable Intake in Low-, Middle- and High-Income Countries: A Scoping Review.干预策略对低收入、中等收入和高收入国家果蔬摄入量的影响:一项范围综述
Food Nutr Bull. 2025 Jul 15:3795721251350208. doi: 10.1177/03795721251350208.
2
A tool for assessing sex/gender bias in epidemiological studies of occupational health: Pilot testing on studies of sedentary behaviour at the workplace and cardiometabolic health.一种评估职业健康流行病学研究中性别偏见的工具:针对工作场所久坐行为与心血管代谢健康研究的试点测试
PLoS One. 2025 May 29;20(5):e0324391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324391. eCollection 2025.
3
Cost-effectiveness analysis of sedentary behaviour interventions in offices to reduce sitting time in Australian desk-based workers: A modelling study.
办公场所中减少澳大利亚伏案工作者久坐行为干预措施的成本效益分析:一项建模研究。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 29;18(6):e0287710. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287710. eCollection 2023.
4
Individual and Occupational Factors Associated With Low Back Pain: The First-ever Occupational Health Study Among Bangladeshi Online Professionals.个体和职业因素与腰痛相关:孟加拉国在线专业人员中的首次职业健康研究。
J Prev Med Public Health. 2022 Jan;55(1):98-105. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.21.565. Epub 2022 Jan 12.
5
Can Motivational Interviewing Make a Difference in Supporting Employees to Deal with Elevated Blood Pressure? A Feasibility Study at the Workplace.动机性访谈能否在支持员工应对高血压方面发挥作用?工作场所的可行性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 15;18(8):4179. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18084179.
6
Use of Intervention Mapping for Occupational Risk Prevention and Health Promotion: A Systematic Review of Literature.应用干预映射进行职业风险预防和健康促进:文献系统综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 11;18(4):1775. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041775.
7
The effectiveness and complexity of interventions targeting sedentary behaviour across the lifespan: a systematic review and meta-analysis.针对整个生命周期久坐行为的干预措施的有效性和复杂性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020 Apr 25;17(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00957-0.
8
Effects of sedentary behaviour interventions on biomarkers of cardiometabolic risk in adults: systematic review with meta-analyses.久坐行为干预对成人心血管代谢风险生物标志物的影响:荟萃分析的系统评价
Br J Sports Med. 2021 Feb;55(3):144-154. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2019-101154. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
9
The Effectiveness of Sedentary Behaviour Reduction Workplace Interventions on Cardiometabolic Risk Markers: A Systematic Review.减少久坐行为的工作场所干预措施对心血管代谢风险标志物的有效性:系统评价。
Sports Med. 2019 Nov;49(11):1739-1767. doi: 10.1007/s40279-019-01168-9.
10
Choice architecture interventions to improve diet and/or dietary behaviour by healthcare staff in high-income countries: a systematic review.高收入国家医疗保健人员改善饮食和/或饮食行为的选择架构干预措施:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jan 23;9(1):e023687. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023687.