Salvo Nadia, Bennett Kathryn, Cheung Amy, Chen Yvonne, Rice Maureen, Rush Brian, Bullock Heather, Bowlby Anne
McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.
J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;21(4):245-52.
WE CONDUCTED A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW TO ANSWER THE QUESTION: Among youth ≤18 years of age with a mental disorder, does substance use prevention compared to no prevention result in reduced rates of substance use/abuse/disorder (SUD)? The review was requested by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care through the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Evidence on Tap program.
A four-step search process was used: Search 1 and 2: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated a SUD prevention intervention in individuals with a mental disorder who were: 1) ≤18 years; or, 2) any age. Search 3: Observational studies of an intervention to prevent SUD in those with mental disorder. Search 4: RCTs that evaluated a SUD primary prevention skills-based intervention in high-risk youth ≤18 years.
Searches 1 and 2: one RCT conducted in youth was found; Search 3: two observational studies were found. All three studies reported statistically significant reductions in substance use. Search 4: five RCTs were found with mixed results. Methodological weaknesses including inadequate study power may explain the results.
Little is known about effective interventions to prevent SUD in youth with a mental disorder. Effective SUD primary prevention programs exist and should be evaluated in this high-risk group.
我们进行了一项系统评价,以回答以下问题:在18岁及以下患有精神障碍的青少年中,与不进行预防相比,物质使用预防措施是否能降低物质使用/滥用/障碍(SUD)的发生率?安大略省卫生和长期护理部通过加拿大卫生研究院的“即时证据”项目要求进行此项评价。
采用四步搜索流程:搜索1和2:评估针对患有精神障碍个体的SUD预防干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT),这些个体为:1)18岁及以下;或2)任何年龄。搜索3:对患有精神障碍者预防SUD干预措施的观察性研究。搜索4:评估针对18岁及以下高危青少年基于SUD初级预防技能干预措施的RCT。
搜索1和2:找到一项在青少年中开展的RCT;搜索3:找到两项观察性研究。所有三项研究均报告物质使用有统计学意义的减少。搜索4:找到五项RCT,结果不一。包括研究效能不足在内的方法学弱点可能解释了这些结果。
对于预防患有精神障碍青少年的SUD的有效干预措施知之甚少。有效的SUD初级预防项目存在,应对这一高危群体进行评估。