Suppr超能文献

预防患有精神障碍的儿童/青少年使用成瘾物质:一项系统综述。

Prevention of substance use in children/adolescents with mental disorders: a systematic review.

作者信息

Salvo Nadia, Bennett Kathryn, Cheung Amy, Chen Yvonne, Rice Maureen, Rush Brian, Bullock Heather, Bowlby Anne

机构信息

McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.

出版信息

J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2012 Nov;21(4):245-52.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

WE CONDUCTED A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW TO ANSWER THE QUESTION: Among youth ≤18 years of age with a mental disorder, does substance use prevention compared to no prevention result in reduced rates of substance use/abuse/disorder (SUD)? The review was requested by the Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-term Care through the Canadian Institutes for Health Research Evidence on Tap program.

METHODS

A four-step search process was used: Search 1 and 2: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated a SUD prevention intervention in individuals with a mental disorder who were: 1) ≤18 years; or, 2) any age. Search 3: Observational studies of an intervention to prevent SUD in those with mental disorder. Search 4: RCTs that evaluated a SUD primary prevention skills-based intervention in high-risk youth ≤18 years.

RESULTS

Searches 1 and 2: one RCT conducted in youth was found; Search 3: two observational studies were found. All three studies reported statistically significant reductions in substance use. Search 4: five RCTs were found with mixed results. Methodological weaknesses including inadequate study power may explain the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Little is known about effective interventions to prevent SUD in youth with a mental disorder. Effective SUD primary prevention programs exist and should be evaluated in this high-risk group.

摘要

目的

我们进行了一项系统评价,以回答以下问题:在18岁及以下患有精神障碍的青少年中,与不进行预防相比,物质使用预防措施是否能降低物质使用/滥用/障碍(SUD)的发生率?安大略省卫生和长期护理部通过加拿大卫生研究院的“即时证据”项目要求进行此项评价。

方法

采用四步搜索流程:搜索1和2:评估针对患有精神障碍个体的SUD预防干预措施的随机对照试验(RCT),这些个体为:1)18岁及以下;或2)任何年龄。搜索3:对患有精神障碍者预防SUD干预措施的观察性研究。搜索4:评估针对18岁及以下高危青少年基于SUD初级预防技能干预措施的RCT。

结果

搜索1和2:找到一项在青少年中开展的RCT;搜索3:找到两项观察性研究。所有三项研究均报告物质使用有统计学意义的减少。搜索4:找到五项RCT,结果不一。包括研究效能不足在内的方法学弱点可能解释了这些结果。

结论

对于预防患有精神障碍青少年的SUD的有效干预措施知之甚少。有效的SUD初级预防项目存在,应对这一高危群体进行评估。

相似文献

9
10
Incentives for preventing smoking in children and adolescents.预防儿童和青少年吸烟的激励措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 6;6(6):CD008645. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008645.pub3.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence.GRADE 指南:3. 评估证据质量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):401-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验