Suppr超能文献

模型研究报告规范。

Reporting guidelines for modelling studies.

机构信息

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012 Nov 7;12:168. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-12-168.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Modelling studies are used widely to help inform decisions about health care and policy and their use is increasing. However, in order for modelling to gain strength as a tool for health policy, it is critical that key model factors are transparent so that users of models can have a clear understanding of the model and its limitations.Reporting guidelines are evidence-based tools that specify minimum criteria for authors to report their research such that readers can both critically appraise and interpret study findings. This study was conducted to determine whether there is an unmet need for population modelling reporting guidelines.

METHODS

We conducted a review of the literature to identify: 1) guidance for reporting population modelling studies; and, 2) evidence on the quality of reporting of population modelling studies. Guidance for reporting was analysed using a thematic approach and the data was summarised as frequencies. Evidence on the quality of reporting was reviewed and summarized descriptively.

RESULTS

There were no guidelines that specifically addressed the reporting of population modelling studies. We identified a number of reporting guidelines for economic evaluation studies, some of which had sections that were relevant population modelling studies. Amongst seven relevant records, we identified 69 quality criteria that have distinct reporting characteristics. We identified two papers that addressed reporting practices of modelling studies. Overall, with the exception of describing the data used for calibration, there was little consistency in reporting.

CONCLUSIONS

While numerous guidelines exist for developing and evaluating health technology assessment and economic evaluation models, which by extension could be applicable to population modelling studies, there is variation in their comprehensiveness and in the consistency of reporting these methods. Population modelling studies may be an area which would benefit from the development of a reporting guideline.

摘要

背景

模型研究被广泛用于为医疗保健和政策决策提供信息,其使用也在不断增加。然而,为了使模型成为健康政策的有力工具,关键模型因素必须透明,以便模型使用者能够清楚地了解模型及其局限性。报告指南是基于证据的工具,规定了作者报告研究的最低标准,以便读者能够批判性地评估和解释研究结果。本研究旨在确定是否需要制定人群模型报告指南。

方法

我们对文献进行了综述,以确定:1)报告人群模型研究的指南;2)人群模型研究报告质量的证据。使用主题分析方法对报告指南进行分析,并将数据汇总为频率。对报告质量的证据进行了回顾和描述性总结。

结果

没有专门针对人群模型研究报告的指南。我们确定了一些针对经济评估研究的报告指南,其中一些指南有与人群模型研究相关的部分。在七份相关记录中,我们确定了 69 条具有独特报告特征的质量标准。我们确定了两篇讨论建模研究报告实践的论文。总体而言,除了描述用于校准的数据外,报告的一致性很差。

结论

虽然有许多指南用于开发和评估卫生技术评估和经济评估模型,这些模型可以扩展应用于人群模型研究,但它们的全面性和报告这些方法的一致性存在差异。人群模型研究可能是需要制定报告指南的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/657f/3533955/c25b230c07a2/1471-2288-12-168-1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验