Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University Third Hospital, Haidian District, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2012 Nov 7;12:157. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-12-157.
To compare the characteristics between 22-channel water-perfusion manometry (WPM) and solid-state manometry (SSM) with 36 sensors of the pressure measurements, as well as patients' discomfort indices in nose and pharynx, the preparation and operation time of the manometry.
12 volunteers were included in the study. Each of the volunteers underwent esophageal manometry by both 22-channel water-perfusion catheter (WPC) and solid-state catheter (SSC) with 36 sensors in random order, and separated by 30 min. The subjects gave a VAS score soon after each test. Non-parametric tests were used to analyze the differences and Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the consistency of the two systems.
During the wet swallows, there were significant differences between the two systems in three measurements of location of lower esophageal sphincter (LES) upper margin (Z = -2.11, P = 0.035), LES relax ratio (Z = -2.20, P = 0.028) and IRP4s (Z = -2.05, P = 0.041). During the jelly pocket swallows, LES relax ratio measurements of the two systems showed significant differences (Z = -2.805, P = 0.005). Further Bland-Altman plots analysis presented good agreement between the two systems measurements of location of LES upper margin, LES relax ratio and IRP4s. The discomfort indices of subjects' nasal sensation were higher when inserting the solid-state catheter [5(3.75-5)] than water-perfusion one (2.5(2-4)) (Z = -2.471, P = 0.013), as well as the discomfort indices of pharyngeal sensation (7.5(4.75-9) vs. 4.5(3.75-6.5)), (Z = -2.354, P = 0.019). The preparation time for WPC was 40(39-41) minutes, which was much longer than that for SSC 32.5(31.75-33) minutes, (Z = -3.087, P = 0.002). And the nurses reported it's much easier to insert WPC (Z = -3.126, P = 0.002).
In conclusion, most pressure measurements were consistent between WPM and SSM. Patients tolerated better with WPC, while for operators, the SSC presented more convenient.
比较 22 通道水灌注测压(WPM)和 36 个传感器的固态测压(SSM)在压力测量方面的特点,以及患者鼻和咽部的不适指数、测压的准备和操作时间。
研究纳入 12 名志愿者。志愿者随机先后接受 22 通道水灌注导管(WPC)和 36 个传感器的固态导管(SSC)测压,两次测压间隔 30 分钟。每次测试后,受试者立即进行视觉模拟评分(VAS)。采用非参数检验分析两种系统之间的差异,采用 Bland-Altman 图评估两种系统的一致性。
在湿吞咽时,两种系统在下食管括约肌(LES)上缘位置(Z=-2.11,P=0.035)、LES 松弛率(Z=-2.20,P=0.028)和 IRP4s(Z=-2.05,P=0.041)三个测量值方面存在显著差异。在果冻口袋吞咽时,两种系统的 LES 松弛率测量值存在显著差异(Z=-2.805,P=0.005)。进一步的 Bland-Altman 图分析显示,两种系统测量的 LES 上缘位置、LES 松弛率和 IRP4s 之间具有良好的一致性。当插入固态导管时,患者的鼻腔感觉不适指数较高[5(3.75-5)],高于水灌注导管[2.5(2-4)](Z=-2.471,P=0.013),咽部感觉不适指数也较高[7.5(4.75-9)vs.4.5(3.75-6.5)](Z=-2.354,P=0.019)。WPC 的准备时间为 40(39-41)分钟,明显长于 SSC 的 32.5(31.75-33)分钟(Z=-3.087,P=0.002)。护士报告说,插入 WPC 容易得多(Z=-3.126,P=0.002)。
总之,WPM 和 SSM 之间的大多数压力测量结果一致。患者对 WPC 的耐受性更好,而对于操作者而言,SSC 更方便。