Brain Sciences Institute, Faculty of Life and Social Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Melbourne, Australia.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(6):566-74. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.683118.
The present study compared the effects of a variety of mobile phone usage conditions to different levels of alcohol intoxication on simulated driving performance and psychomotor vigilance.
Twelve healthy volunteers participated in a crossover design in which each participant completed a simulated driving task on 2 days, separated by a 1-week washout period. On the mobile phone day, participants performed the simulated driving task under each of 4 conditions: no phone usage, a hands-free naturalistic conversation, a hands-free cognitively demanding conversation, and texting. On the alcohol day, participants performed the simulated driving task at four different blood alcohol concentration (BAC) levels: 0.00, 0.04, 0.07, and 0.10. Driving performance was assessed by variables including time within target speed range, time spent speeding, braking reaction time, speed deviation, and lateral lane position deviation.
In the BAC 0.07 and 0.10 alcohol conditions, participants spent less time in the target speed range and more time speeding and took longer to brake in the BAC 0.04, 0.07, and 0.10 than in the BAC 0.00 condition. In the mobile phone condition, participants took longer to brake in the natural hands-free conversation, cognitively demanding hands-free conversation and texting conditions and spent less time in the target speed range and more time speeding in the cognitively demanding, hands-free conversation, and texting conditions. When comparing the 2 conditions, the naturalistic conversation was comparable to the legally permissible BAC level (0.04), and the cognitively demanding and texting conversations were similar to the BAC 0.07 to 0.10 results.
The findings of the current laboratory study suggest that very simple conversations on a mobile phone may not represent a significant driving risk (compared to legally permissible BAC levels), whereas cognitively demanding, hands-free conversation, and particularly texting represent significant risks to driving.
本研究比较了各种手机使用条件和不同程度的醉酒对模拟驾驶表现和精神警觉性的影响。
12 名健康志愿者参与了一项交叉设计研究,其中每名参与者在 2 天内完成了一项模拟驾驶任务,间隔 1 周的洗脱期。在手机日,参与者在 4 种条件下完成模拟驾驶任务:不使用手机、免提自然对话、免提认知要求对话和发短信。在酒精日,参与者在 4 个不同的血液酒精浓度(BAC)水平下完成模拟驾驶任务:0.00、0.04、0.07 和 0.10。驾驶表现通过以下变量评估:目标速度范围内的时间、超速时间、制动反应时间、速度偏差和横向车道位置偏差。
在 BAC 0.07 和 0.10 酒精条件下,参与者在目标速度范围内花费的时间较少,超速时间较长,在 BAC 0.04、0.07 和 0.10 条件下制动时间较长,而在 BAC 0.00 条件下制动时间较短。在手机条件下,参与者在自然免提对话、认知要求免提对话和发短信条件下制动时间较长,在认知要求、免提对话和发短信条件下在目标速度范围内花费的时间较少,超速时间较长。当比较这两种情况时,自然对话与合法允许的 BAC 水平(0.04)相当,而认知要求和发短信对话与 BAC 0.07 至 0.10 的结果相似。
本实验室研究的结果表明,手机上进行非常简单的对话可能不会对驾驶造成显著风险(与合法允许的 BAC 水平相比),而认知要求高的免提对话和特别是发短信对驾驶构成重大风险。