• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

沙特阿拉伯利雅得的新生儿败血症五年回顾

Half a decade of neonatal sepsis, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

作者信息

Haque K N, Chagia A H, Shaheed M M

机构信息

Division of Neonatology, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

J Trop Pediatr. 1990 Feb;36(1):20-3. doi: 10.1093/tropej/36.1.20.

DOI:10.1093/tropej/36.1.20
PMID:2313776
Abstract

In a retrospective study to determine the pattern of neonatal sepsis, all cases admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) between October 1983 and July 1988 at King Khalid University Hospital, in Riyadh were studied. During the review period there were a total of 2117 admissions to the NICU. Of those 1252 (59 per cent) underwent septic screening sometimes during their stay in the NICU. The number of babies with proven bacteremia, i.e.; positive blood and or cerebrospinal fluid culture was 190 (15 per cent). Gram-positive organisms were cultured from 132 (69 per cent) and Gram-negative organisms from 47 (25 per cent) of the babies. The single most frequent organism was Staphylococcus epidermidis accounting for 36 per cent (58/190) of all proven cases. These results differ appreciably from other studies reported previously from Riyadh as well as from some other parts of the world, and stress the need to recognize Staphylococcus epidermidis as an increasingly important pathogen in the newborn nursery.

摘要

在一项确定新生儿败血症模式的回顾性研究中,对1983年10月至1988年7月期间在利雅得的哈立德国王大学医院新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)收治的所有病例进行了研究。在回顾期内,NICU共收治了2117名患者。其中1252名(59%)在NICU住院期间接受了败血症筛查。确诊为菌血症的婴儿数量,即血培养和/或脑脊液培养呈阳性的婴儿有190名(15%)。132名(69%)婴儿培养出革兰氏阳性菌,47名(25%)婴儿培养出革兰氏阴性菌。最常见的单一病原体是表皮葡萄球菌,占所有确诊病例的36%(58/190)。这些结果与利雅得此前报道的其他研究以及世界其他一些地区的研究结果明显不同,并强调有必要认识到表皮葡萄球菌是新生儿重症监护室中日益重要的病原体。

相似文献

1
Half a decade of neonatal sepsis, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得的新生儿败血症五年回顾
J Trop Pediatr. 1990 Feb;36(1):20-3. doi: 10.1093/tropej/36.1.20.
2
Pattern of proven bacterial sepsis in a neonatal intensive care unit in Riyadh-Saudi Arabia: a 2-year analysis.沙特阿拉伯利雅得一家新生儿重症监护病房确诊的细菌性败血症模式:一项为期两年的分析。
J Med Liban. 2000 Mar-Apr;48(2):77-83.
3
Culture-proven neonatal sepsis in preterm infants in a neonatal intensive care unit over a 7 year period: coagulase-negative Staphylococcus as the predominant pathogen.7年间新生儿重症监护病房中经培养证实的早产儿新生儿败血症:凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌为主要病原体。
Pediatr Int. 2014 Feb;56(1):60-6. doi: 10.1111/ped.12218.
4
Bacteremia in children at the University Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得大学医院儿童菌血症情况
World J Pediatr. 2008 May;4(2):118-22. doi: 10.1007/s12519-008-0023-9.
5
A ten year, multicentre study of coagulase negative staphylococcal infections in Australasian neonatal units.一项针对澳大利亚和新西兰新生儿重症监护病房凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌感染的十年多中心研究。
Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2003 Mar;88(2):F89-93. doi: 10.1136/fn.88.2.f89.
6
Characteristics of neonatal Sepsis at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯一家三级护理医院新生儿脓毒症的特征。
J Infect Public Health. 2019 Sep-Oct;12(5):666-672. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2019.03.007. Epub 2019 Apr 13.
7
Persistence of a multiresistant clone of Staphylococcus epidermidis in a neonatal intensive-care unit for a four-year period.耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌多重耐药克隆株在新生儿重症监护病房持续存在四年
Clin Infect Dis. 1995 Jan;20(1):24-9. doi: 10.1093/clinids/20.1.24.
8
A prospective study of nosocomial infection in a neonatal intensive care unit.新生儿重症监护病房医院感染的前瞻性研究。
J Paediatr Child Health. 1995 Oct;31(5):387-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1995.tb00843.x.
9
Neonatal septicaemia in Ilorin: bacterial pathogens and antibiotic sensitivity pattern.伊洛林地区的新生儿败血症:细菌病原体及抗生素敏感性模式
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2002 Jun;31(2):127-30.
10
Changing etiology and outcome of neonatal septicemia in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯利雅得新生儿败血症的病因变化与转归
Acta Paediatr Scand. 1986 Jul;75(4):540-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1986.tb10246.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Characteristics and Associated Risk Factors of Neonatal Sepsis: A Retrospective Study From Saudi Arabia.新生儿败血症的特征及相关危险因素:沙特阿拉伯的一项回顾性研究
Cureus. 2024 Dec 28;16(12):e76517. doi: 10.7759/cureus.76517. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Risk and diagnostic factors and therapy outcome of neonatal early onset sepsis in ICU patients of Saudi Arabia: a systematic review and meta analysis.沙特阿拉伯重症监护病房患者新生儿早发型败血症的风险、诊断因素及治疗结果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Front Pediatr. 2023 Aug 23;11:1206389. doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1206389. eCollection 2023.
3
Common Bacterial Isolates Associated With Neonatal Sepsis and Their Antimicrobial Profile: A Retrospective Study at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
与新生儿败血症相关的常见细菌分离株及其抗菌谱:沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学医院的一项回顾性研究。
Cureus. 2022 Jan 11;14(1):e21107. doi: 10.7759/cureus.21107. eCollection 2022 Jan.
4
Epidemiology and risk factors associated with early onset neonatal sepsis in the south of KSA.沙特阿拉伯南部早发型新生儿败血症的流行病学及相关危险因素
J Taibah Univ Med Sci. 2020 Sep 25;15(6):509-514. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2020.08.009. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Presentation and outcomes of early and late onset neonatal sepsis in a Nigerian Hospital.尼日利亚一家医院早发型和晚发型新生儿败血症的临床表现及结局
Afr Health Sci. 2019 Sep;19(3):2390-2399. doi: 10.4314/ahs.v19i3.12.
6
Prevalence and risk factors of early fecal carriage of Enterococcus faecalis and Staphylococcus spp and their antimicrobial resistant patterns among healthy neonates born in a hospital setting in central Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯中部一家医院出生的健康新生儿中粪肠球菌和葡萄球菌属早期粪便携带情况、危险因素及其抗菌耐药模式
Saudi Med J. 2016 Mar;37(3):280-7. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.3.13871.
7
Incidence of Late Onset Neonatal Sepsis in Very Low Birth Weight Infants in a Tertiary Hospital: An ongoing challenge.一家三级医院极低出生体重儿晚发型新生儿败血症的发病率:一项持续存在的挑战。
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2010 Aug;10(2):227-30. Epub 2010 Jul 19.
8
Aetiology, risk factors and immediate outcome of bacteriologically confirmed neonatal septicaemia in Mulago hospital, Uganda.乌干达穆拉戈医院细菌学确诊的新生儿败血症的病因、危险因素及近期转归
Afr Health Sci. 2006 Jun;6(2):120-6. doi: 10.5555/afhs.2006.6.2.120.