Academy of Swiss Insurance Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
PLoS One. 2012;7(11):e49760. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049760. Epub 2012 Nov 19.
The dramatic rise in chronically ill patients on permanent disability benefits threatens the sustainability of social security in high-income countries. Social insurance organizations have started to invest in promising, but costly return to work (RTW) coordination programmes. The benefit, however, remains uncertain. We conducted a systematic review to determine the long-term effectiveness of RTW coordination compared to usual practice in patients at risk for long-term disability.
Eligible trials enrolled employees on work absence for at least 4 weeks and randomly assigned them to RTW coordination or to usual practice. We searched 5 databases (to April 2, 2012). Two investigators performed standardised eligibility assessment, study appraisal and data extraction independently and in duplicate. The GRADE framework guided our assessment of confidence in the meta-analytic estimates. We identified 9 trials from 7 countries, 8 focusing on musculoskeletal, and 1 on mental complaints. Most trials followed participants for 12 months or less. No trial assessed permanent disability. Moderate quality evidence suggests a benefit of RTW coordination on proportion at work at end of follow-up (risk ratio = 1.08, 95% CI = 1.03 to 1.13; absolute effect = 5 in 100 additional individuals returning to work, 95% CI = 2 to 8), overall function (mean difference [MD] on a 0 to 100 scale = 5.2, 95% CI = 2.4 to 8.0; minimal important difference [MID] = 10), physical function (MD = 5.3, 95% CI = 1.4 to 9.1; MID = 8.4), mental function (MD = 3.1, 95% CI = 0.7 to 5.6; MID = 7.3) and pain (MD = 6.1, 95% CI = 3.1 to 9.2; MID = 10).
Moderate quality evidence suggests that RTW coordination results in small relative, but likely important absolute benefits in the likelihood of disabled or sick-listed patients returning to work, and associated small improvements in function and pain. Future research should explore whether the limited effects persist, and whether the programmes are cost effective in the long term.
长期患病并领取伤残津贴的人数大幅增加,这对高收入国家的社会保障可持续性构成了威胁。社会保险机构已开始投资于有前景但成本高昂的重返工作岗位(RTW)协调计划。然而,其效益仍不确定。我们进行了一项系统评价,以确定与长期残疾风险患者的常规做法相比,RTW 协调的长期效果。
合格试验纳入至少缺勤 4 周的员工,并将他们随机分配到 RTW 协调或常规治疗组。我们在 5 个数据库中进行了搜索(截至 2012 年 4 月 2 日)。两名调查员独立地以双重盲法进行了标准的合格性评估、研究评价和数据提取。GRADE 框架指导了我们对荟萃分析估计的信心评估。我们从 7 个国家的 9 项试验中确定了 9 项试验,其中 8 项针对肌肉骨骼,1 项针对精神疾病。大多数试验随访时间不超过 12 个月。没有试验评估永久性残疾。中等质量的证据表明,RTW 协调在随访结束时的工作比例方面有获益(风险比=1.08,95%置信区间为 1.03 至 1.13;绝对效果=每 100 人中增加 5 人重返工作岗位,95%置信区间为 2 至 8),整体功能(0 至 100 分制的平均差值=5.2,95%置信区间为 2.4 至 8.0;最小重要差值=10),身体功能(MD=5.3,95%置信区间=1.4 至 9.1;最小重要差值=8.4),精神功能(MD=3.1,95%置信区间=0.7 至 5.6;最小重要差值=7.3)和疼痛(MD=6.1,95%置信区间=3.1 至 9.2;最小重要差值=10)。
中等质量的证据表明,RTW 协调在残疾或病休患者重返工作岗位的可能性以及相关功能和疼痛的微小改善方面,产生了相对较小但可能非常重要的绝对获益。未来的研究应探讨这些有限的效果是否持续存在,以及这些方案在长期内是否具有成本效益。