Anderson S W, Damasio H, Tranel D
Department of Neurology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City.
Arch Neurol. 1990 Apr;47(4):397-405. doi: 10.1001/archneur.1990.00530040039017.
Populations of patients with strokes or tumors constitute the most frequently used subjects in neuropsychological research, and these populations are often combined when the investigation aims at establishing brain-behavior relationships. We compared these two populations with respect to their neuropsychological profiles. Seventeen subjects with tumors were individually matched to subjects with unilateral strokes on the basis of lesion location. Despite close matching of lesions, there were major differences in the neuropsychological impairments of the two groups, eg, all subjects with stroke in the left hemisphere had more severe language defects than did their counterparts with tumors, and some tumor subjects performed normally on all neuropsychological tests. These findings demonstrate that the cognitive and/or behavioral consequences of tumors or strokes in similar locations can be radically different. The two patient types should be treated separately for the purpose of neuropsychological research.
中风或肿瘤患者群体是神经心理学研究中最常使用的研究对象,当研究旨在建立脑与行为的关系时,这些群体常常被合并使用。我们比较了这两类患者群体的神经心理学特征。17名肿瘤患者根据病变位置与单侧中风患者进行个体匹配。尽管病变部位匹配紧密,但两组患者的神经心理学损伤存在重大差异,例如,所有左半球中风的患者比患有肿瘤的对应患者有更严重的语言缺陷,并且一些肿瘤患者在所有神经心理学测试中表现正常。这些发现表明,相似位置的肿瘤或中风所导致的认知和/或行为后果可能截然不同。出于神经心理学研究的目的,这两种患者类型应分开对待。