Health Department Sant Joan - Alacant, Health Authority, Alicante, Spain.
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2013 Jan;12(1):9-18. doi: 10.1517/14740338.2013.744965. Epub 2012 Dec 10.
To analyze the extent to which Spanish leaflets and drug information on the Net met quality criteria.
A descriptive study was conducted comparing readability (REA) and comprehensibility (COM) criteria of a random sample of 77 marketed products of the 12 active ingredients most frequently sold in 2010 in Spain. Leaflets were approved by the Spanish Agency for Medication (AEMPS). Flesch index, DISCERN, ELF, MIDAS and CIRF scales were used to evaluate quality criteria.
COM assessment yielded between 63 and 77% of the maximum possible scores on the scales. None of the websites or leaflets met all the quality criteria of the DISCERN, CIRF or MIDAS scales. Four (3%) leaflets met all the 22 quality criteria of ELF. The leaflets showed shortcomings regarding: medication benefits (17 required substantial improvements, 31.5%), correct forms of storage (13, 24.1%), contraindications (12, 22.2%), side effects (11, 20.4%) and precautions to be taken (9, 16.7%).
The quality of the information approved by the AEMPS is superior to that which can be found by surfing the Net. More specific information on precautions, complications and how to avoid common patient errors would allow patients the best chance to contribute to their own clinical safety.
分析西班牙药品说明书和网络药品信息符合质量标准的程度。
对随机抽取的 77 种 2010 年在西班牙最常销售的 12 种活性成分的上市药品进行描述性研究,比较其可读性(REA)和可理解性(COM)标准。这些说明书均获得了西班牙药品管理局(AEMPS)的批准。采用 Flesch 指数、DISCERN、ELF、MIDAS 和 CIRF 量表来评估质量标准。
COM 评估结果显示,在各量表上的得分均介于最高得分的 63%至 77%之间。没有一个网站或说明书符合 DISCERN、CIRF 或 MIDAS 量表的所有质量标准。有 4 份(3%)说明书符合 ELF 的 22 项质量标准。说明书在以下方面存在不足:药物益处(17 项,占 31.5%)、正确的储存方式(13 项,占 24.1%)、禁忌症(12 项,占 22.2%)、副作用(11 项,占 20.4%)和注意事项(9 项,占 16.7%)。
AEMPS 批准的信息质量优于网上冲浪所获得的信息质量。更具体的关于注意事项、并发症以及如何避免常见的患者错误的信息将使患者有更好的机会为自己的临床安全做出贡献。