Department of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, P.O. Box 5003, N-1432 Ås, Norway.
J Chromatogr A. 2013 Jan 4;1271(1):144-52. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2012.11.048. Epub 2012 Nov 26.
We present an evaluation of HPLC-based analytical tools for the simultaneous analysis of native and oxidized cello-oligosaccharides, which are products of enzymatic cellulose degradation. Whereas cello-oligosaccharides arise from cellulose depolymerization by glycoside hydrolases, oxidized cello-oligosaccharides are produced by cellobiose dehydrogenase and the recently identified copper dependent lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) currently classified as CBM33 and GH61. The latter enzymes are wide-spread and expected to play crucial roles in further development of efficient enzyme technology for biomass conversion. Three HPLC approaches with well documented performance in the field of oligosaccharide analysis have been investigated: high-performance anion-exchange chromatography (HPAEC), hydrophilic interaction chromatography (HILIC) and porous graphitized carbon liquid chromatography (PGC-LC). HPAEC with pulsed amperometric detection (PAD) was superior for analysis of oxidized oligosaccharides, combining the best separation with superior sensitivity for oligosaccharide species with a degree of polymerization (DP) ranging from 1 to 10. Furthermore, the HPAEC method can be optimized for operation in a high-throughput manner (run time 10 min). Both PGC-LC and HILIC allow reasonable run times (41 and 25 min, respectively), with acceptable separation, but suffer from poor sensitivity compared to HPAEC-PAD. On the other hand, PGC-LC and HILIC benefit from being fully compatible with online mass spectrometry. Using an LC-MS setup, these methods will deliver much better sensitivity than what can be obtained with conventional detectors such as ultraviolet-, charged aerosol-, or evaporative light scattering and may reach sensitivities similar to or even better than what is obtained in HPAEC-PAD. Pure oxidized cello-oligosaccharide standards, ranging from DP2 to DP5, were obtained by semi-preparative PGC and characterized by MS and NMR analysis.
我们评估了基于 HPLC 的分析工具,用于同时分析天然和氧化的纤维寡糖,它们是纤维素降解的产物。纤维寡糖是由糖苷水解酶从纤维素解聚产生的,而氧化的纤维寡糖是由纤维二糖脱氢酶和最近发现的依赖铜的溶细胞多糖单加氧酶(LPMOs)产生的,后者目前被分类为 CBM33 和 GH61。这些酶广泛存在,预计在进一步开发高效的纤维素酶转化生物质技术方面发挥关键作用。我们研究了三种在寡糖分析领域具有良好文献记录的 HPLC 方法:高效阴离子交换色谱(HPAEC)、亲水相互作用色谱(HILIC)和多孔石墨化碳液相色谱(PGC-LC)。带脉冲安培检测(PAD)的 HPAEC 对氧化寡糖的分析更为优越,它结合了最佳的分离效果和对聚合度(DP)为 1 到 10 的寡糖的优异灵敏度。此外,HPAEC 方法可以进行优化,以实现高通量操作(运行时间 10 分钟)。PGC-LC 和 HILIC 都可以实现合理的运行时间(分别为 41 和 25 分钟),具有可接受的分离效果,但与 HPAEC-PAD 相比,灵敏度较差。另一方面,PGC-LC 和 HILIC 受益于与在线质谱完全兼容。使用 LC-MS 装置,这些方法将提供比传统检测器(如紫外、带电气溶胶或蒸发光散射)获得的灵敏度更高的灵敏度,并且可以达到与 HPAEC-PAD 相似或甚至更好的灵敏度。通过半制备 PGC 获得了从 DP2 到 DP5 的纯氧化纤维寡糖标准品,并通过 MS 和 NMR 分析进行了表征。