Suppr超能文献

脑脊液和脑结构影像学标志物与阿尔茨海默病病理级联反应。

CSF and brain structural imaging markers of the Alzheimer's pathological cascade.

机构信息

Department of Bioengineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(12):e47406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047406. Epub 2012 Dec 19.

Abstract

Cerebral spinal fluid (CSF) and structural imaging markers are suggested as biomarkers amended to existing diagnostic criteria of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). But there is no clear instruction on which markers should be used at which stage of dementia. This study aimed to first investigate associations of the CSF markers as well as volumes and shapes of the hippocampus and lateral ventricles with MCI and AD at the baseline and secondly apply these baseline markers to predict MCI conversion in a two-year time using the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) cohort. Our results suggested that the CSF markers, including Aβ42, t-tau, and p-tau, distinguished MCI or AD from NC, while the Aβ42 CSF marker contributed to the differentiation between MCI and AD. The hippocampal shapes performed better than the hippocampal volumes in classifying NC and MCI, NC and AD, as well as MCI and AD. Interestingly, the ventricular volumes were better than the ventricular shapes to distinguish MCI or AD from NC, while the ventricular shapes showed better accuracy than the ventricular volumes in classifying MCI and AD. As the CSF markers and the structural markers are complementary, the combination of them showed great improvements in the classification accuracies of MCI and AD. Moreover, the combination of these markers showed high sensitivity but low specificity for predicting conversion from MCI to AD in two years. Hence, it is feasible to employ a cross-sectional sample to investigate dynamic associations of the CSF and imaging markers with MCI and AD and to predict future MCI conversion. In particular, the volumetric information may be good for the early stage of AD, while morphological shapes should be considered as markers in the prediction of MCI conversion to AD together with the CSF markers.

摘要

脑脊液 (CSF) 和结构影像学标志物被提议作为修订轻度认知障碍 (MCI) 和阿尔茨海默病 (AD) 现有诊断标准的生物标志物。但是,对于在痴呆的哪个阶段应该使用哪些标志物,尚无明确的指导。本研究旨在首先探讨 CSF 标志物以及海马体和侧脑室的体积和形状与基线时的 MCI 和 AD 的关联,其次应用这些基线标志物来预测在两年内使用阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议 (ADNI) 队列中 MCI 的转化。我们的研究结果表明,包括 Aβ42、t-tau 和 p-tau 在内的 CSF 标志物可将 MCI 或 AD 与 NC 区分开来,而 Aβ42 CSF 标志物有助于区分 MCI 和 AD。在对 NC 和 MCI、NC 和 AD 以及 MCI 和 AD 进行分类时,海马体形状的表现优于海马体体积。有趣的是,与区分 MCI 或 AD 与 NC 相比,脑室体积比脑室形状更好,而脑室形状在区分 MCI 和 AD 方面比脑室体积具有更高的准确性。由于 CSF 标志物和结构标志物是互补的,因此它们的组合可大大提高 MCI 和 AD 的分类准确性。此外,这些标志物的组合在预测两年内从 MCI 到 AD 的转化方面具有较高的敏感性和较低的特异性。因此,使用横断面样本研究 CSF 和影像学标志物与 MCI 和 AD 的动态关联并预测未来的 MCI 转化是可行的。特别是,体积信息可能对 AD 的早期阶段有用,而形态学形状应该与 CSF 标志物一起被视为预测 MCI 向 AD 转化的标志物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/493c/3526616/18d5284d7a26/pone.0047406.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验