• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胰腺癌疾病影响评分的制定和初步验证。

Development and preliminary validation of the pancreatic cancer disease impact score.

机构信息

Division of Cancer, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, P.O. Box 4956, Oslo, 0424, Norway.

出版信息

Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1677-84. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1713-3. Epub 2013 Jan 13.

DOI:10.1007/s00520-012-1713-3
PMID:23314652
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3641289/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patient-reported outcomes are important for clinical practice and research, and should reflect what patients perceive as important. The objective of this study was to develop and preliminarily validate a brief, patient-derived, disease-specific tool, the pancreatic cancer disease impact (PACADI) score.

METHODS

The development was performed in two phases. Forty-one patients with confirmed pancreatic cancer (PC) selected dimensions of health related to the impact of the disease. A weighting of the eight most frequently reported dimensions was performed in a second sample of 80 PC patients who also rated the impact on eight numeric rating scales (NRS, range 0 to 10). The relative weights and the scores from the NRS were used to compute the PACADI score (range 0 to 10). The patients also completed Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) and EQ-5D.

RESULTS

Dimensions reported by more than 20% of the patients were included in the PACADI score (relative weights in parenthesis): pain/discomfort (0.16), fatigue (0.16), anxiety (0.15), bowel/digestive problems (0.14), loss of appetite (0.13), dry mouth (0.11), itchiness (0.08), and nausea (0.07). The PACADI score in the 80 PC patients had a mean (SD) value of 3.26 (2.06) (95% CI 2.80, 3.71), was moderately to strongly correlated to ESAS sense of well-being (r = 0.69) and EQ-5D (r = -0.52), and discriminated significantly between patients with and without PC.

CONCLUSION

The PACADI score is a new eight-item, patient-derived, disease-specific measure. Preliminary validation regarding construct validity and discrimination encourages further validation in independent patient samples.

摘要

目的

患者报告的结局对于临床实践和研究很重要,应该反映患者认为重要的内容。本研究的目的是开发并初步验证一种简短的、源自患者的、针对特定疾病的工具,即胰腺癌疾病影响(PACADI)评分。

方法

该研究分两个阶段进行。41 名确诊为胰腺癌(PC)的患者选择了与疾病影响相关的健康维度。在第二组 80 名 PC 患者中,对这 8 个最常报告的维度进行了加权,这些患者还对 8 个数字评定量表(NRS,范围 0 到 10)的影响进行了评分。NRS 的相对权重和评分用于计算 PACADI 评分(范围 0 到 10)。患者还完成了埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(ESAS)和 EQ-5D 量表。

结果

超过 20%的患者报告的维度被纳入 PACADI 评分(括号中为相对权重):疼痛/不适(0.16)、疲劳(0.16)、焦虑(0.15)、肠道/消化问题(0.14)、食欲减退(0.13)、口干(0.11)、瘙痒(0.08)和恶心(0.07)。80 名 PC 患者的 PACADI 评分均值(SD)为 3.26(2.06)(95%CI 2.80,3.71),与 ESAS 幸福感(r=0.69)和 EQ-5D(r=-0.52)中度至高度相关,并且能够显著区分有和无 PC 的患者。

结论

PACADI 评分是一种新的八项、源自患者的、针对特定疾病的测量工具。初步验证了其结构有效性和区分能力,鼓励在独立患者样本中进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4668/3641289/380ddec57bb3/520_2012_1713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4668/3641289/380ddec57bb3/520_2012_1713_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4668/3641289/380ddec57bb3/520_2012_1713_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and preliminary validation of the pancreatic cancer disease impact score.胰腺癌疾病影响评分的制定和初步验证。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1677-84. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1713-3. Epub 2013 Jan 13.
2
Psychometric performance of the PAncreatic CAncer disease impact (PACADI) score.胰腺癌疾病影响(PACADI)评分的心理测量学性能。
Pancreatology. 2019 Oct;19(7):971-978. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
3
Translation and validation of the Pancreatic Cancer Disease Impact score for Chinese patients with pancreatic cancer: A methodological and cross-sectional study.胰腺癌患者胰腺癌疾病影响评分的中文翻译与验证:一项方法学和横断面研究。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Feb 17;10(4):100209. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100209. eCollection 2023 Apr.
4
Edmonton symptom assessment scale: Italian validation in two palliative care settings.埃德蒙顿症状评估量表:在两种姑息治疗环境中的意大利语验证
Support Care Cancer. 2006 Jan;14(1):30-7. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0834-3. Epub 2005 Jun 4.
5
A patient-derived and patient-reported outcome measure for assessing psoriatic arthritis: elaboration and preliminary validation of the Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) questionnaire, a 13-country EULAR initiative.一种用于评估银屑病关节炎的患者报告结局测量工具:疾病对银屑病关节炎影响(PsAID)问卷的制定和初步验证,这是一个由 13 个国家的 EULAR 发起的项目。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Jun;73(6):1012-9. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205207.
6
The revised Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue measures and the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease scale: validation in six countries.修订后的布里斯托类风湿关节炎疲劳量表和类风湿关节炎疾病影响量表:在六个国家的验证。
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2018 Feb 1;57(2):300-308. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/kex370.
7
Association between disease activity measured by RAPID3 and health-related quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎患者通过 RAPID3 测量的疾病活动与健康相关生活质量之间的关联。
Rheumatol Int. 2019 May;39(5):827-834. doi: 10.1007/s00296-019-04258-z. Epub 2019 Mar 7.
8
Measuring fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis: a cross-sectional study to evaluate the Bristol Rheumatoid Arthritis Fatigue Multi-Dimensional questionnaire, visual analog scales, and numerical rating scales.评估布里斯托类风湿关节炎疲劳多维问卷、视觉模拟量表和数字评定量表在类风湿关节炎疲劳测量中的横断面研究。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2010 Nov;62(11):1559-68. doi: 10.1002/acr.20282. Epub 2010 Jun 25.
9
Validation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale.埃德蒙顿症状评估量表的验证
Cancer. 2000 May 1;88(9):2164-71. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(20000501)88:9<2164::aid-cncr24>3.0.co;2-5.
10
Combined cancer patient-reported symptom and health utility tool for routine clinical implementation: a real-world comparison of the ESAS and EQ-5D in multiple cancer sites.用于常规临床实施的癌症患者报告症状和健康效用联合工具:多个癌症部位的 ESAS 和 EQ-5D 的真实世界比较。
Curr Oncol. 2019 Dec;26(6):e733-e741. doi: 10.3747/co.26.5297. Epub 2019 Dec 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Pancreatic Cancer Surgery: What Matters to Patients?胰腺癌手术:对患者而言什么最重要?
J Clin Med. 2023 Jul 11;12(14):4611. doi: 10.3390/jcm12144611.
2
Translation and validation of the Pancreatic Cancer Disease Impact score for Chinese patients with pancreatic cancer: A methodological and cross-sectional study.胰腺癌患者胰腺癌疾病影响评分的中文翻译与验证:一项方法学和横断面研究。
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2023 Feb 17;10(4):100209. doi: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100209. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Improving Ovine Behavioral Pain Diagnosis by Implementing Statistical Weightings Based on Logistic Regression and Random Forest Algorithms.

本文引用的文献

1
Defining cut-off values for disease activity states and improvement scores for patient-reported outcomes: the example of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID).定义疾病活动状态和患者报告结局改善评分的截断值:以类风湿关节炎疾病影响(RAID)为例。
Arthritis Res Ther. 2012 May 30;14(3):R129. doi: 10.1186/ar3859.
2
Onset of action of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis based on patient-reported outcomes.基于患者报告结局的依那西普治疗类风湿关节炎的起效时间。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012 Mar-Apr;30(2):266-8. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
3
Epidemiology, risk factors, and the promotion of pancreatic cancer: role of the stellate cell.
通过基于逻辑回归和随机森林算法实施统计加权来改进绵羊行为疼痛诊断
Animals (Basel). 2022 Oct 26;12(21):2940. doi: 10.3390/ani12212940.
4
Development and calibration data for the Illness Burden item bank: a new computer adaptive test for persons with type 2 diabetes mellitus.疾病负担条目库的开发和校准数据:一种用于 2 型糖尿病患者的新型计算机自适应测试。
Qual Life Res. 2023 Mar;32(3):797-811. doi: 10.1007/s11136-022-03282-0. Epub 2022 Oct 25.
5
PACADI: translation and adaptation of a Swedish-language version of the pancreatic cancer disease impact score.PACADI:一种瑞典语版胰腺癌疾病影响评分的翻译和改编。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Oct 12;15(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-06199-6.
6
Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Pancreatic Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy.接受放射治疗的胰腺癌患者报告结局测量指标
Cancers (Basel). 2020 Sep 2;12(9):2487. doi: 10.3390/cancers12092487.
7
Long term oncological outcome of laparoscopic techniques in pancreatic cancer.腹腔镜技术用于胰腺癌的长期肿瘤学结局
World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2018 Dec 16;10(12):383-391. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v10.i12.383.
8
Updated therapeutic outcome for patients with periampullary and pancreatic cancer related to recent translational research.与近期转化研究相关的壶腹周围癌和胰腺癌患者的最新治疗结果
World J Gastroenterol. 2016 Dec 28;22(48):10502-10511. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i48.10502.
9
Cost Effectiveness of Metal Stents in Relieving Obstructive Jaundice in Patients with Pancreatic Cancer.金属支架缓解胰腺癌患者梗阻性黄疸的成本效益分析
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2017 Mar;48(1):58-65. doi: 10.1007/s12029-016-9907-4.
10
Pancreatic cancer-improved care achievable.胰腺癌——改善护理切实可行。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug 14;20(30):10405-18. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i30.10405.
流行病学、风险因素与胰腺癌的促进:星状细胞的作用。
J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Mar;27 Suppl 2(0 2):127-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2011.07013.x.
4
Pancreatic cancer: overview of descriptive epidemiology.胰腺癌:描述性流行病学概述。
Mol Carcinog. 2012 Jan;51(1):3-13. doi: 10.1002/mc.20785.
5
Advancing PROMIS's methodology: results of the Third Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS(®)) Psychometric Summit.推进 PROMIS 方法学:第三届患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS(®))心理测量学峰会的结果。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Dec;11(6):677-84. doi: 10.1586/erp.11.74.
6
Finalisation and validation of the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease score, a patient-derived composite measure of impact of rheumatoid arthritis: a EULAR initiative.类风湿关节炎疾病影响评分的最终确定和验证:一个源自患者的类风湿关节炎影响综合衡量指标:一个 EULAR 倡议。
Ann Rheum Dis. 2011 Jun;70(6):935-42. doi: 10.1136/ard.2010.142901.
7
Parametric methods outperformed non-parametric methods in comparisons of discrete numerical variables.参数方法在离散数值变量的比较中优于非参数方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2011 Apr 13;11:44. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-11-44.
8
Patient-reported outcomes in palliative gastrointestinal stenting: a Norwegian multicenter study.患者报告的姑息性胃肠道支架置入术结局:一项挪威多中心研究。
Surg Endosc. 2011 Oct;25(10):3162-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1680-7. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
9
Assessing the Symptoms of Cancer Using Patient-Reported Outcomes (ASCPRO): searching for standards.使用患者报告结局(ASCPRO)评估癌症症状:寻找标准。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 Jun;39(6):1077-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2009.05.025.
10
Characteristics of qualitative studies in influential journals of general medicine: a critical review.影响普通医学期刊的定性研究特征:批判性评价。
Biosci Trends. 2009 Dec;3(6):202-9.