Advances in the research enterprise. Commentary.
作者信息
Kupersmith Joel
出版信息
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S43-4. doi: 10.1002/hast.141.
DOI:10.1002/hast.141
PMID:23315897
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Advances in the research enterprise. Commentary.研究事业的进展。评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S43-4. doi: 10.1002/hast.141.
2
The unbelievable rightness of being in clinical trials. Commentary.参与临床试验的难以置信的正确性。评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S30-1. doi: 10.1002/hast.136.
3
Reform within the common rule? Commentary.《共同规则》框架内的改革？评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S40-2. doi: 10.1002/hast.140.
4
A prescription for ethical learning. Commentary.一份道德学习的处方。评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S28-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.135.
5
Making the transition to a learning health care system. Commentary.向学习型医疗保健系统转型。评论
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S32-3. doi: 10.1002/hast.137.
6
Ethical oversight: serving the best interests of patients. Commentary.伦理监督：服务于患者的最大利益。评论
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S34-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.138.
7
Evaluation as part of operations: reconciling the common rule and continuous improvement. Commentary.作为运营一部分的评估：协调通用规则与持续改进。评论
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S37-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.139.
8
An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics.学习型医疗保健系统的伦理框架：对传统研究伦理和临床伦理的背离。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S16-27. doi: 10.1002/hast.134.
9
Ethical oversight of research on patient care.对患者护理研究的伦理监督。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S2-3. doi: 10.1002/hast.132.
10
The research-treatment distinction: a problematic approach for determining which activities should have ethical oversight.研究与治疗的区分：一种用于确定哪些活动应接受伦理监督的有问题的方法。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S4-S15. doi: 10.1002/hast.133.
引用本文的文献
1
Informed consent within a learning health system: A scoping review.学习型健康系统中的知情同意：一项范围综述。
Learn Health Syst. 2019 Dec 4;4(2):e10206. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10206. eCollection 2020 Apr.
2
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation.实用随机对照试验中的伦理问题：对近期文献的综述揭示了伦理论证方面的差距。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x.
3
When clinical care is like research: the need for review and consent.当临床护理如同研究时：审查与同意的必要性。
Theor Med Bioeth. 2016 Jun;37(3):193-209. doi: 10.1007/s11017-016-9364-x.
Zotero 插件