• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A prescription for ethical learning. Commentary.

作者信息

Largent Emily A, Miller Franklin G, Joffe Steven

出版信息

Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S28-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.135.

DOI:10.1002/hast.135
PMID:23315890
Abstract
摘要

相似文献

1
A prescription for ethical learning. Commentary.一份道德学习的处方。评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S28-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.135.
2
Ethical oversight: serving the best interests of patients. Commentary.伦理监督：服务于患者的最大利益。评论
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S34-6. doi: 10.1002/hast.138.
3
Making the transition to a learning health care system. Commentary.向学习型医疗保健系统转型。评论
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S32-3. doi: 10.1002/hast.137.
4
Advances in the research enterprise. Commentary.研究事业的进展。评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S43-4. doi: 10.1002/hast.141.
5
The unbelievable rightness of being in clinical trials. Commentary.参与临床试验的难以置信的正确性。评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S30-1. doi: 10.1002/hast.136.
6
Reform within the common rule? Commentary.《共同规则》框架内的改革？评论。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S40-2. doi: 10.1002/hast.140.
7
Evaluation as part of operations: reconciling the common rule and continuous improvement. Commentary.作为运营一部分的评估：协调通用规则与持续改进。评论
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S37-9. doi: 10.1002/hast.139.
8
Ethical oversight of research on patient care.对患者护理研究的伦理监督。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S2-3. doi: 10.1002/hast.132.
9
An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics.学习型医疗保健系统的伦理框架：对传统研究伦理和临床伦理的背离。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S16-27. doi: 10.1002/hast.134.
10
The research-treatment distinction: a problematic approach for determining which activities should have ethical oversight.研究与治疗的区分：一种用于确定哪些活动应接受伦理监督的有问题的方法。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2013 Jan-Feb;Spec No:S4-S15. doi: 10.1002/hast.133.

引用本文的文献

1
Think Pragmatically: Investigators' Obligations to Patient-Subjects When Research is Embedded in Care.务实思考：当研究嵌入医疗照护时，研究者对患者的义务。
Am J Bioeth. 2023 Aug;23(8):10-21. doi: 10.1080/15265161.2022.2063435. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
2
Stakeholder perspectives regarding pragmatic clinical trial collateral findings.利益相关者对实用临床试验附带结果的看法。
Learn Health Syst. 2020 Aug 28;5(4):e10245. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10245. eCollection 2021 Oct.
3
An Analysis of the Learning Health System in Its First Decade in Practice: Scoping Review.
实践首个十年的学习型健康系统分析：范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 19;22(3):e17026. doi: 10.2196/17026.
4
Stakeholder perspectives regarding alternate approaches to informed consent for comparative effectiveness research.利益相关者对比较效果研究知情同意替代方法的看法。
Learn Health Syst. 2017 Dec 5;2(2):e10047. doi: 10.1002/lrh2.10047. eCollection 2018 Apr.
5
Accommodating quality and service improvement research within existing ethical principles.在现有伦理原则范围内开展质量和服务改进研究。
Trials. 2018 Jun 25;19(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2724-2.
6
Ethical issues in pragmatic randomized controlled trials: a review of the recent literature identifies gaps in ethical argumentation.实用随机对照试验中的伦理问题：对近期文献的综述揭示了伦理论证方面的差距。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Feb 27;19(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0253-x.
7
Paying Research Participants: Regulatory Uncertainty, Conceptual Confusion, and a Path Forward.支付研究参与者：监管不确定性、概念混淆及前进之路。
Yale J Health Policy Law Ethics. 2017 Winter;17(1):61-141.
8
Ethics Issues Arising in the Transition to Learning Health Care Systems: Results from Interviews with Leaders from 25 Health Systems.向学习型医疗保健系统转型过程中出现的伦理问题：对25个医疗系统领导者的访谈结果
EGEMS (Wash DC). 2016 Mar 29;4(2):1212. doi: 10.13063/2327-9214.1212. eCollection 2016.
9
A risk screening tool for ethical appraisal of evidence-generating initiatives.一种用于对证据生成计划进行伦理评估的风险筛查工具。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Jul 7;16:47. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0039-3.