Department of Geography, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-3220, USA.
Demography. 2013 Aug;50(4):1217-41. doi: 10.1007/s13524-012-0192-y.
The question of whether environmental conditions influence human migration has recently gained considerable attention, driven by claims that global environmental change will displace large populations. Despite this high level of interest, few quantitative studies have investigated the potential effects of environmental factors on migration, particularly in the developing world and for gradual but pervasive forms of environmental change. To address this, a retrospective migration survey was conducted in rural Ecuador and linked to data on topography, climate, and weather shocks. These data were used to estimate multivariate event history models of alternative forms of mobility (local mobility, internal migration, and international migration), controlling for a large number of covariates. This approach is generalizable to other study areas and responds to calls for the development of more rigorous methods in this field. The results indicate that adverse environmental conditions do not consistently increase rural out-migration and, in some cases, reduce migration. Instead, households respond to environmental factors in diverse ways, resulting in complex migratory responses. Overall, the results support an alternative narrative of environmentally induced migration that recognizes the adaptability of rural households in responding to environmental change.
环境条件是否会影响人类迁移这一问题最近受到了相当大的关注,其主要依据是有观点声称,全球环境变化将会使大量人口被迫迁移。尽管人们对此非常关注,但很少有定量研究调查环境因素对迁移的潜在影响,特别是在发展中国家,以及在环境逐渐但普遍发生变化的情况下。为了解决这一问题,我们在厄瓜多尔农村地区进行了一项回溯性迁移调查,并将其与地形、气候和天气冲击数据联系起来。我们利用这些数据,通过多元事件历史模型估计了各种形式的流动性(本地流动性、国内移民和国际移民),并控制了大量的协变量。这种方法具有普遍性,可以应用于其他研究领域,并响应了该领域开发更严格方法的呼吁。研究结果表明,不利的环境条件并不一定会持续增加农村地区的外出移民,在某些情况下甚至会减少移民。相反,家庭会以多种方式对环境因素做出反应,从而导致复杂的迁移反应。总的来说,研究结果支持了一种替代性的环境引起的迁移叙述,该叙述承认了农村家庭在应对环境变化时的适应性。