• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

监狱内自伤管理中的参与式行动研究方法。

A participatory action research methodology in the management of self-harm in prison.

机构信息

SASS, Durham University, Durham, UK.

出版信息

J Ment Health. 2013 Aug;22(4):306-16. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2012.734645. Epub 2013 Jan 16.

DOI:10.3109/09638237.2012.734645
PMID:23323726
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Self-harm in custody is a well-researched phenomenon. This is particularly true for women in prison who demonstrate disproportionately high rates of self-harm. Despite the growing body of prison research, there has been a lack of service user involvement (SUI). Aims To outline the first use of SUI in a custodial setting in developing care pathways for self-harm.

METHODOLOGY

A participatory action research approach was used to engage women prisoners and staff.

RESULTS

Participants were able to identify strengths and weaknesses of current care pathways and offer suggestions for service development based upon their experience of receiving and delivering care.

CONCLUSION

The authors conclude that despite participatory approaches being in their infancy in prisons the engagement of service users when aimed at effecting positive change can be successful.

摘要

背景

在羁押场所中,自残是一个研究充分的现象。对于监狱中的女性来说尤其如此,她们表现出自残的比例过高。尽管监狱研究的数量不断增加,但服务使用者参与度却一直较低。

目的

概述在发展自残护理途径中,首次在羁押场所中使用服务使用者参与度。

方法

采用参与式行动研究方法,让女囚犯和工作人员参与进来。

结果

参与者能够识别当前护理途径的优缺点,并根据他们接受和提供护理的经验,提出服务发展的建议。

结论

作者得出结论,尽管参与式方法在监狱中还处于起步阶段,但旨在实现积极变革的服务使用者参与可以取得成功。

相似文献

1
A participatory action research methodology in the management of self-harm in prison.监狱内自伤管理中的参与式行动研究方法。
J Ment Health. 2013 Aug;22(4):306-16. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2012.734645. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
2
Prison staff and women prisoner's views on self-harm; their implications for service delivery and development: A qualitative study.监狱工作人员与女性囚犯对自我伤害的看法;其对服务提供与发展的影响:一项定性研究。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2010 Oct;20(4):274-84. doi: 10.1002/cbm.777.
3
A critical exploration of the management of self-harm in a male custodial setting: qualitative findings of a comparative analysis of prison staff views on self-harm.男性羁押场所中自我伤害管理的批判性探究:监狱工作人员对自我伤害看法的比较分析定性研究结果
J Forensic Nurs. 2013 Jan-Mar;9(1):23-34. doi: 10.1097/JFN.0b013e31827a5984.
4
Assessing the risk of self-harm in an adult offender population: an incidence cohort study.评估成年罪犯群体中的自残风险:一项发病率队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2014 Oct;18(64):1-151, vii-viii. doi: 10.3310/hta18640.
5
Characteristics of women in a prison mental health assessment unit in England and Wales (2008-2010).英格兰和威尔士一所监狱心理健康评估单位中女性的特征(2008 - 2010年)
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2016 Apr;26(2):136-52. doi: 10.1002/cbm.1953. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
6
Non-suicidal self-harm in prison: A national population-based study.监狱中非自杀性自伤:一项全国性基于人群的研究。
Psychiatry Res. 2019 Feb;272:216-221. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.12.103. Epub 2018 Dec 19.
7
Self-harm following release from prison: A prospective data linkage study.出狱后自残行为:一项前瞻性数据关联研究。
Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2017 Mar;51(3):250-259. doi: 10.1177/0004867416640090. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
8
Exploring the antipathy of nursing staff who work within secure healthcare facilities across the United Kingdom to young people who self-harm.探讨英国安全医疗机构内护理人员对自残青少年的反感。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jan;68(1):147-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05745.x. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
9
The incidence and profile of self-harm among prisoners: findings from the Self-Harm Assessment and Data Analysis Project 2017-2019.囚犯中自我伤害的发生率及特征:2017 - 2019年自我伤害评估与数据分析项目的结果
Int J Prison Health. 2023 Nov 28;19(4):565-577. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-02-2023-0012. Epub 2023 May 3.
10
Lessons Learnt From the Narratives of Women Who Self-Harm in Prison.从狱中自残女性的叙述中吸取教训。
Crisis. 2021 Jul;42(4):255-262. doi: 10.1027/0227-5910/a000714. Epub 2020 Aug 26.

引用本文的文献

1
The "Best of Both Worlds": Building a community-academic partnership for research with legal system-impacted individuals.“两全其美”:建立社区与学术机构的伙伴关系,以便与受法律系统影响的个人开展研究。
Am J Community Psychol. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.70004.
2
Lived experience codesign of self-harm interventions: a scoping review.生活经验共同设计自伤干预措施:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2023 Dec 27;13(12):e079090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079090.
3
Establishing Self-Harm Registers: The Role of Process Mapping to Improve Quality of Surveillance Data Globally.
建立自伤登记册:流程映射在全球范围内提高监测数据质量的作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2647. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032647.
4
A systematic review and mixed-methods synthesis of the experiences, perceptions and attitudes of prison staff regarding adult prisoners who self-harm.关于监狱工作人员对成年自残囚犯的经历、看法和态度的系统评价与混合方法综合研究
BJPsych Open. 2022 Jun 6;8(4):e102. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2022.70.
5
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in prisons: the involvement of people living in prison in the research process - a systematic scoping review.患者及公众参与(PPI)在监狱中的情况:监狱服刑人员参与研究过程——一项系统性综述。
Health Justice. 2021 Nov 11;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00154-6.
6
A scoping review: The utility of participatory research approaches in psychology.参与式研究方法在心理学中的应用:范围综述
J Community Psychol. 2019 Nov;47(8):1865-1892. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22231. Epub 2019 Aug 23.
7
Assessing the predictability of self-harm in a high-risk adult prisoner population: a prospective cohort study.评估高危成年囚犯群体中自我伤害的可预测性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Health Justice. 2018 Sep 21;6(1):18. doi: 10.1186/s40352-018-0076-3.
8
Improving the quality of prison research: A qualitative study of ex-offender service user involvement in prison suicide prevention research.提高监狱研究质量:一项关于前罪犯服务使用者参与监狱自杀预防研究的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):100-109. doi: 10.1111/hex.12590. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
9
Service user and carer priorities in a Biomedical Research Centre for mental health.生物医学研究中心中服务使用者和护理者的优先事项:心理健康领域
J Ment Health. 2016 Jun;25(3):185-8. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2016.1167862. Epub 2016 Apr 11.