• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高监狱研究质量:一项关于前罪犯服务使用者参与监狱自杀预防研究的定性研究。

Improving the quality of prison research: A qualitative study of ex-offender service user involvement in prison suicide prevention research.

机构信息

Division of Psychology and Mental Health, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.

Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, MAHSC, Manchester, UK.

出版信息

Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):100-109. doi: 10.1111/hex.12590. Epub 2017 Jun 22.

DOI:10.1111/hex.12590
PMID:28640480
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5750753/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Suicide is the leading cause of avoidable death in prisons worldwide and suicide prevention is an international priority. Consequently, there is an urgent need to develop evidence-based treatments. We conducted a randomized controlled trial of a novel suicide prevention psychological therapy for male prisoners. To promote ecological validity by addressing the "real-world" situation of suicidal prisoners, we involved a consultant group of ex-offenders with past experience of being suicidal during imprisonment. Service user involvement in prison research is challenging and underdeveloped.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the ex-offender service user consultants' experiences of being involved in the research.

DESIGN

Individual qualitative interviews were conducted and analysed using an Interpretative Phenomenology Analysis (IPA) framework.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: The study was conducted at a university in North England, UK, comprising four ex-offenders with experience of being suicidal during past imprisonments.

RESULTS

Two superordinate themes were identified: "Working Together" depicted participants' perceptions of the pivotal role of good relationships with researchers, and "Journey of Change" outlined how participants' involvement in the research impacted on their personal lives.

DISCUSSION

Little is known about how to successfully involve ex-offender service users in research. Our results indicate the conditions necessary for successfully engaging ex-offender service users in research and have important implications for improving the quality of prison research.

CONCLUSIONS

Involving forensic service users in research is feasible and should be encouraged, as despite certain challenges, it is highly rewarding both for the research and the ex-offender service users.

摘要

背景

自杀是全球监狱中可避免死亡的主要原因,预防自杀是国际优先事项。因此,迫切需要开发基于证据的治疗方法。我们对一种针对男性囚犯的新型预防自杀心理疗法进行了随机对照试验。为了通过解决有自杀倾向的囚犯的“现实世界”情况来提高生态有效性,我们邀请了一组有过在狱期间自杀经历的前罪犯顾问参与。服务用户参与监狱研究具有挑战性且不发达。

目的

我们旨在调查前罪犯服务用户顾问参与研究的经验。

设计

采用解释现象学分析(IPA)框架对个人定性访谈进行了分析。

地点/参与者:该研究在英国英格兰北部的一所大学进行,参与者包括四名有过在过去监禁期间自杀经历的前罪犯。

结果

确定了两个上级主题:“共同工作”描绘了参与者对与研究人员建立良好关系的关键作用的看法,“变革之旅”概述了参与者参与研究如何影响他们的个人生活。

讨论

对于如何成功地让前罪犯服务用户参与研究知之甚少。我们的研究结果表明了成功吸引前罪犯服务用户参与研究的必要条件,并对提高监狱研究质量具有重要意义。

结论

让法医服务用户参与研究是可行的,应该鼓励这样做,因为尽管存在某些挑战,但这对研究和前罪犯服务用户都有很高的回报。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf7/5750753/bf0c60a45515/HEX-21-100-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf7/5750753/bf0c60a45515/HEX-21-100-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/acf7/5750753/bf0c60a45515/HEX-21-100-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving the quality of prison research: A qualitative study of ex-offender service user involvement in prison suicide prevention research.提高监狱研究质量:一项关于前罪犯服务使用者参与监狱自杀预防研究的定性研究。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):100-109. doi: 10.1111/hex.12590. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
2
Bowel cancer screening in an English prison: a qualitative service evaluation.英国监狱的肠癌筛查:一项定性服务评估。
Public Health. 2020 Mar;180:46-50. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2019.10.024. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
3
Reflections on researcher departure: Closure of prison relationships in ethnographic research.关于研究者离开的思考:民族志研究中监狱关系的终结。
Nurs Ethics. 2019 Aug;26(5):1424-1441. doi: 10.1177/0969733017747959. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
4
Processes of change in an offender personality disorder pathway prison progression unit.罪犯人格障碍路径监狱进阶单元中的改变过程。
Crim Behav Ment Health. 2017 Jul;27(3):254-264. doi: 10.1002/cbm.2032.
5
Self-harm in prisons in England and Wales: an epidemiological study of prevalence, risk factors, clustering, and subsequent suicide.英格兰和威尔士监狱中的自残行为:流行率、风险因素、聚集性和随后自杀的流行病学研究。
Lancet. 2014 Mar 29;383(9923):1147-54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)62118-2. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
6
Users' views of prison health services: a qualitative study.用户对监狱卫生服务的看法:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2007 May;58(3):216-26. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04221.x.
7
Patients, prisoners, or people? Women prisoners' experiences of primary care in prison: a qualitative study.患者、囚犯,还是人?女性囚犯在监狱中的初级医疗护理体验:一项定性研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2008 Sep;58(554):630-6. doi: 10.3399/bjgp08X330771.
8
A thematic analysis of how prisoners overcome suicidality.关于囚犯如何克服自杀倾向的主题分析。
Int J Prison Health. 2014;10(4):212-27. doi: 10.1108/IJPH-05-2014-0014.
9
The priorities for a prisoner are food, being able to talk to their family, and taking a shower: the experiences of prisoners placed in emergency isolation due to COVID-19 in a Catalan prison.囚犯的首要需求是食物、能够与家人通话和洗澡:加泰罗尼亚一所监狱中因 COVID-19 而被紧急隔离的囚犯的经历。
Int J Prison Health (2024). 2024 Aug 27;20(3):313-326. doi: 10.1108/IJOPH-05-2023-0028.
10
"They Treat Us Like Human Beings"--Experiencing a Therapeutic Sex Offenders Prison: Impact on Prisoners and Staff and Implications for Treatment.“他们把我们当人看”——体验性犯罪者治疗监狱:对囚犯和工作人员的影响及治疗启示
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2016 Mar;60(4):371-96. doi: 10.1177/0306624X14553227. Epub 2014 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Including Prisoners in Research Design: Codevelopment of a Practical Guidance Toolkit to Support Intervention Delivery to Address the Physical and Mental Health of Older Prisoners (PAMHOP) Study.将囚犯纳入研究设计:共同开发实用指导工具包以支持干预措施的实施,以解决老年囚犯的身心健康问题(PAMHOP研究)
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70246. doi: 10.1111/hex.70246.
2
"We wish we had the option": a qualitative study of women's perspectives and experiences with contraception in a provincial prison in Ontario, Canada.“我们希望我们能有选择”:对加拿大安大略省一所省级监狱中女性避孕观念及经历的定性研究
Health Justice. 2024 Apr 12;12(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40352-024-00269-6.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Cognitive Behavioural Suicide Prevention for Male Prisoners: Case examples.男性囚犯的认知行为自杀预防:案例示例
Cogn Behav Pract. 2016 Nov;23(4):485-501. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpra.2015.09.006. Epub 2015 Oct 21.
2
A literature review on the representativeness of randomized controlled trial samples and implications for the external validity of trial results.关于随机对照试验样本代表性及其对试验结果外部有效性影响的文献综述。
Trials. 2015 Nov 3;16:495. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1023-4.
3
Cognitive-behavioural suicide prevention for male prisoners: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
Youth partnership in suicide prevention research: moving beyond the safety discourse.
青年在预防自杀研究中的伙伴关系:超越安全话语。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 27;13(10):e076885. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076885.
4
The experience of patient partners in research: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis.患者伙伴参与研究的经历:一项定性系统评价与主题综合分析
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Oct 3;8(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00388-0.
5
Patient and public involvement (PPI) in prisons: the involvement of people living in prison in the research process - a systematic scoping review.患者及公众参与(PPI)在监狱中的情况:监狱服刑人员参与研究过程——一项系统性综述。
Health Justice. 2021 Nov 11;9(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s40352-021-00154-6.
6
Development of an online suicide prevention program involving people with lived experience: ideas and challenges.开发一个由有亲身经历者参与的在线自杀预防项目:思路与挑战。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Sep 8;7(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00307-9.
7
Collaboration with people with lived experience of prison: reflections on researching cancer care in custodial settings.与有监狱服刑经历者的合作:关于研究羁押场所癌症护理的思考
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 29;7(1):48. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00284-z.
8
Adverse Social Relationships in Childhood: Are there Links with Depression, Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder and Suicidality in Adulthood?儿童时期不良的社会关系:与成年后的抑郁、强迫症和自杀倾向有关吗?
Child Psychiatry Hum Dev. 2021 Oct;52(5):945-956. doi: 10.1007/s10578-020-01077-3. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
9
A psychological intervention for suicide applied to non-affective psychosis: the CARMS (Cognitive AppRoaches to coMbatting Suicidality) randomised controlled trial protocol.一项针对非情感性精神病的自杀心理干预措施:CARMS(认知方法应对自杀倾向)随机对照试验方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 16;20(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12888-020-02697-8.
10
Evaluating the impact of patient and carer involvement in suicide and self-harm research: A mixed-methods, longitudinal study protocol.评估患者及护理人员参与自杀与自残研究的影响:一项混合方法纵向研究方案。
Health Expect. 2021 May;24 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):47-53. doi: 10.1111/hex.13000. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
男性囚犯的认知行为自杀预防:一项试点随机对照试验。
Psychol Med. 2015 Dec;45(16):3441-51. doi: 10.1017/S0033291715001348. Epub 2015 Jul 13.
4
A participatory action research methodology in the management of self-harm in prison.监狱内自伤管理中的参与式行动研究方法。
J Ment Health. 2013 Aug;22(4):306-16. doi: 10.3109/09638237.2012.734645. Epub 2013 Jan 16.
5
Obstacles to research in residential juvenile justice facilities: recommendations for researchers.住宅式少年司法设施中的研究障碍:对研究人员的建议。
Behav Sci Law. 2012 Jan-Feb;30(1):49-68. doi: 10.1002/bsl.1991. Epub 2012 Jan 4.
6
The development of a tool to measure service user satisfaction with in-patient forensic services: The Forensic Satisfaction Scale.开发一种衡量住院法医服务用户满意度的工具:法医满意度量表。
J Ment Health. 2010 Jun;19(3):272-81. doi: 10.3109/09638231003728133.
7
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials.CONSORT 2010 声明:平行组随机试验报告的更新指南。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jun 1;152(11):726-32. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-152-11-201006010-00232. Epub 2010 Mar 24.
8
Prison suicide in 12 countries: an ecological study of 861 suicides during 2003-2007.12 个国家的监狱自杀:2003-2007 年期间 861 例自杀的生态学研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;46(3):191-5. doi: 10.1007/s00127-010-0184-4. Epub 2010 Feb 7.
9
Wise owls and professors: the role of older researchers in the review of the National Service Framework for Older People.睿智的猫头鹰与教授们:老年研究者在《老年人国家服务框架》审查中的作用。
Health Expect. 2008 Dec;11(4):409-17. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00513.x.
10
Citizens' juries in planning research priorities: process, engagement and outcome.规划研究重点中的公民陪审团:过程、参与度与结果
Health Expect. 2008 Sep;11(3):272-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00502.x.