Laboratory of BioMedical Physics, University of Antwerp, Groenenborgerlaan 171, B-2020 Antwerpen, Belgium.
J Histochem Cytochem. 2013 May;61(5):382-95. doi: 10.1369/0022155413478613. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
We made a qualitative and quantitative comparison between a state-of-the-art implementation of micro-Computed Tomography (microCT) and the scanning Thin-Sheet Laser Imaging Microscopy (sTSLIM) method, applied to mouse cochleae. Both imaging methods are non-destructive and perform optical sectioning, respectively, with X-rays and laser light. MicroCT can be used on fresh or fixed tissue samples and is primarily designed to image bone rather than soft tissues. It requires complex back-projection algorithms to produce a two-dimensional image, and it is an expensive instrument. sTSLIM requires that a specimen be chemically fixed, decalcified, and cleared; but it produces high-resolution images of soft and bony tissues with minimum image postprocessing and is less expensive than microCT. In this article, we discuss the merits and disadvantages of each method individually and when combined.
我们对一种最先进的微计算机断层扫描(microCT)的实现和扫描薄切片激光成像显微镜(sTSLIM)方法进行了定性和定量比较,应用于小鼠耳蜗。这两种成像方法都是非破坏性的,分别用 X 射线和激光进行光学切片。microCT 可用于新鲜或固定的组织样本,主要设计用于成像骨骼而不是软组织。它需要复杂的反向投影算法来生成二维图像,而且是一种昂贵的仪器。sTSLIM 需要对标本进行化学固定、脱钙和透明化处理;但它可以产生软组织和骨组织的高分辨率图像,且图像后处理最少,比 microCT 更便宜。在本文中,我们单独讨论了每种方法的优缺点,以及它们结合使用时的优缺点。