• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[孕期员工的预防保健。是否有必要制定职业医生与妇产科医生之间的合作规则?]

[Preventive care of pregnant employees. Is there a need to set rules of cooperation between occupational and gynecologist-obstetricians?].

作者信息

Marcinkiewicz Andrzej, Hanke Wojciech

机构信息

Zakład Epidemiologii Srodowiskowej, Instytut Medycyny Pracy im. prof. J. Nofera, Łódź, Poland.

出版信息

Med Pr. 2012;63(5):591-8.

PMID:23373328
Abstract

BACKGROUND

From 2008 the obstetric care for pregnancy-related conditions has been the most common cause of sickness absence. One of the postulated causes of frequent use of sick leaves by gravids is the fear of potential harmful and arduous factors in the workplace. An insufficient involvement of occupational health services in the implementation of actions aimed at protecting pregnant employees from risks to their health and safety in the work environment, imposed by Polish law, is also suggested.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A survey on the current state of preventive care of pregnant employees was conducted among gynecologists-obstetricians working in the Lodz hospitals. They were asked to present their opinions in this regard.

RESULTS

In the opinion of the surveyed gynecologists occupational physicians do not implement their tasks involving preventive care of pregnant employees, and the main burden of care lies with their gynecologists. They admitted that the decision to certify that a pregnant employee is temporarily unable to work is determined not only by the health assessment of a pregnant employee, but also by exposures and loads occurring in her workplace. They emphasized the lack of direct contacts between gynecologists and occupational physicians who should share the information on the potential impact of working conditions on the pregnant employee's health.

CONCLUSION

The survey confirmed the need, noticed also by gynecologists to elaborate standards of specific preventive care addressed to pregnant employees and to set the rules of cooperation between occupational physicians and gynecologist-obstetricians.

摘要

背景

自2008年以来,与妊娠相关疾病的产科护理一直是病假最常见的原因。孕妇频繁使用病假的一个假定原因是担心工作场所存在潜在有害和艰巨的因素。研究还表明,职业健康服务在实施旨在保护怀孕员工免受波兰法律规定的工作环境中健康和安全风险的行动方面参与不足。

材料与方法

对罗兹医院的妇产科医生进行了一项关于怀孕员工预防保健现状的调查。要求他们就此发表意见。

结果

在接受调查的妇科医生看来,职业医生没有履行其涉及怀孕员工预防保健的任务,主要的护理负担落在了妇科医生身上。他们承认,证明怀孕员工暂时无法工作的决定不仅取决于对怀孕员工的健康评估,还取决于其工作场所存在的暴露因素和负荷。他们强调,妇科医生和职业医生之间缺乏直接联系,而他们应该共享关于工作条件对怀孕员工健康潜在影响的信息。

结论

该调查证实了妇科医生也注意到的一种需求,即需要制定针对怀孕员工的具体预防保健标准,并设定职业医生与妇产科医生之间的合作规则。

相似文献

1
[Preventive care of pregnant employees. Is there a need to set rules of cooperation between occupational and gynecologist-obstetricians?].[孕期员工的预防保健。是否有必要制定职业医生与妇产科医生之间的合作规则?]
Med Pr. 2012;63(5):591-8.
2
[What do we know about psychosocial risks at work? Part II.The analysis of employee's knowledge of sources and consequences of stress at work].[我们对工作中的社会心理风险了解多少?第二部分。员工对工作压力来源及后果的认知分析]
Med Pr. 2010;61(4):393-411.
3
[Activities of voivodeship occupational medicine centers in workplace health promotion in 2008].[2008年省职业医学中心在工作场所健康促进方面的活动]
Med Pr. 2010;61(3):353-65.
4
[Assessment of the Polish occupational medicine service (oms) system made by OMS nurses].[职业医学服务护士对波兰职业医学服务(oms)系统的评估]
Med Pr. 2012;63(1):85-90.
5
[Structure of human resources and activities of occupational medicine service in Poland in 2009 and dynamics and trends in recent years].[2009年波兰职业医学服务的人力资源结构与活动以及近年来的动态和趋势]
Med Pr. 2011;62(4):389-94.
6
[Integrated prophylactic care of employees--is it a future model?].[员工综合预防保健——它会是未来的模式吗?]
Med Pr. 2004;55(1):101-4.
7
[Employees health education--challenges according to the educational level].[员工健康教育——基于教育水平的挑战]
Med Pr. 2012;63(1):55-71.
8
[Barriers to occupational activation of people with disabilities at the level of prophylactic care].[预防性护理层面残疾人职业激活的障碍]
Med Pr. 2012;63(6):637-50.
9
[What do we know about psychosocial risk factors at work? Part I. Theoretical considerations].[我们对工作中的社会心理风险因素了解多少?第一部分。理论思考]
Med Pr. 2010;61(3):341-52.
10
[Preventive care in the area of psychosocial risks at work].[工作中社会心理风险领域的预防保健]
Med Pr. 2010;61(1):91-100.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementation, mechanisms and effects of maternity protection legislation: a realist narrative review of the literature.实施、机制和孕哺保护立法的效果:文献的现实主义叙述性综述。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2018 Nov;91(8):901-922. doi: 10.1007/s00420-018-1339-y. Epub 2018 Aug 4.