Poirier S, Brauner D J
Department of Medical Education, University of Illinois, Chicago 60680.
Theor Med. 1990 Mar;11(1):29-39. doi: 10.1007/BF00489236.
The medical record, as a managerial, historic, and legal document, serves many purposes. Although its form may be well established and many of the cases documented in it 'routine' in medical experience, what is written in the medical record nevertheless records decisions and actions of individuals. Viewed as an interpretive 'text', it can itself become the object of interpretation. This essay applies literary theory and methodology to the structure, content, and writing style(s) of an actual medical record for the purpose of exploring the relationship between the forms and language of medical discourse and the daily decisions surrounding medical treatment. The medical record is shown to document not only the absence of a consistent treatment plan for the patient studied but also a breakdown in communication between different health professionals caring for that patient. The paper raises questions about the kind of education being given to house staff in this instance. The essay concludes with a consideration of how such situations might be more generally avoided.
病历作为一份管理性、历史性和法律性文件,有多种用途。尽管其形式可能已确立,且其中记录的许多病例在医疗经验中属于“常规”情况,但病历中所写内容记录了个人的决策和行动。从解释性“文本”的角度来看,它本身也可能成为解释的对象。本文将文学理论和方法应用于一份实际病历的结构、内容和写作风格,旨在探讨医学话语的形式和语言与围绕医疗治疗的日常决策之间的关系。结果表明,该病历不仅记录了所研究患者缺乏一致的治疗方案,还记录了照顾该患者的不同医护人员之间的沟通障碍。本文提出了关于在此情况下住院医生所接受教育类型的问题。文章最后思考了如何更普遍地避免此类情况。