Suppr超能文献

年龄、性别、里程和驾驶员行为问卷:驾驶员行为问卷在不同驾驶员群体中的有效性。

Age, gender, mileage and the DBQ: the validity of the Driver Behavior Questionnaire in different driver groups.

机构信息

DTU Transport, Bygningstorvet 115, DK-2800 Kgs, Lyngby, Denmark.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2013 Mar;52:228-36. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.036. Epub 2013 Feb 7.

Abstract

The Driver Behavior Questionnaire (DBQ) is one of the most widely used instruments for measuring self-reported driving behaviors. Despite the popularity of the DBQ, the applicability of the DBQ in different driver groups has remained mostly unexamined. The present study measured aberrant driving behavior using the original DBQ (Reason, J.T., Manstead, A., Stradling, S.G., Baxter, J., Campbell, K., 1990. Errors and violations on the road - a real distinction. Ergonomics, 33 (10/11), 1315-1332) to test the factorial validity and reliability of the instrument across different subgroups of Danish drivers. The survey was conducted among 11,004 Danish driving license holders of whom 2250 male and 2190 female drivers completed the questionnaire containing background variables and the DBQ. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis showed that the original three-factor solution, a four-factor solution and a two-factor solution had acceptable fit when using the whole sample. However, fit indices of these solutions varied across subgroups. The presents study illustrates that both the original DBQ and a Danish four-factor DBQ structure is relatively stable across subgroups, indicating factorial validity and reliability of the DBQ. However, as the Danish DBQ structure has an overall better fit, the present study highlights the importance of performing an explorative analysis when applying the DBQ in order to assess the problem areas within a driving population.

摘要

驾驶员行为问卷(DBQ)是用于测量自我报告驾驶行为的最广泛使用的工具之一。尽管 DBQ 很受欢迎,但它在不同驾驶员群体中的适用性在很大程度上仍未得到检验。本研究使用原始 DBQ(Reason,J.T.,Manstead,A.,Stradling,S.G.,Baxter,J.,Campbell,K.,1990.道路上的错误和违规 - 真正的区别。人类工效学,33(10/11),1315-1332)来衡量异常驾驶行为,以测试该工具在丹麦不同驾驶员亚组中的因子有效性和可靠性。该调查是在 11004 名丹麦驾驶执照持有者中进行的,其中 2250 名男性和 2190 名女性驾驶员完成了包含背景变量和 DBQ 的问卷。探索性和验证性因子分析表明,原始的三因素解决方案、四因素解决方案和两因素解决方案在使用整个样本时具有可接受的拟合度。然而,这些解决方案的拟合指数在子组之间有所不同。本研究表明,原始的 DBQ 和丹麦的四因素 DBQ 结构在子组之间相对稳定,表明 DBQ 的因子有效性和可靠性。然而,由于丹麦 DBQ 结构的整体拟合度更好,本研究强调了在应用 DBQ 时进行探索性分析的重要性,以便评估驾驶人群中的问题领域。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验