Suppr超能文献

计划还是其他?探究动物园地图任务表现的神经心理学预测因素。

Planning or something else? Examining neuropsychological predictors of Zoo Map performance.

作者信息

Oosterman Joukje M, Wijers Marijn, Kessels Roy P C

机构信息

Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2013;20(2):103-9. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2012.670150. Epub 2012 Dec 13.

Abstract

The Zoo Map Test of the Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome battery is often applied to measure planning ability as part of executive function. Successful performance on this test is, however, dependent on various cognitive functions, and deficient Zoo Map performance does therefore not necessarily imply selectively disrupted planning abilities. To address this important issue, we examined whether planning is still the most important predictor of Zoo Map performance in a heterogeneous sample of neurologic and psychiatric outpatients (N = 71). In addition to the Zoo Map Test, the patients completed other neuropsychological tests of planning, inhibition, processing speed, and episodic memory. Planning was the strongest predictor of the total raw score and inappropriate places visited, and no additional contribution of other cognitive scores was found. One exception to this was the total time, which was associated with processing speed. Overall, our findings indicate that the Zoo Map Test is a valid indicator of planning ability in a heterogeneous patient sample.

摘要

执行功能障碍综合征行为评估量表中的动物园地图测试常被用于测量作为执行功能一部分的计划能力。然而,该测试的成功表现依赖于多种认知功能,因此动物园地图测试表现不佳并不一定意味着计划能力受到选择性破坏。为解决这一重要问题,我们在一组异质性的神经科和精神科门诊患者样本(N = 71)中研究了计划是否仍是动物园地图测试表现的最重要预测因素。除了动物园地图测试,患者还完成了其他关于计划、抑制、处理速度和情景记忆的神经心理学测试。计划是原始总分和访问不当地点的最强预测因素,未发现其他认知分数有额外贡献。唯一的例外是总时间,它与处理速度相关。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,在异质性患者样本中,动物园地图测试是计划能力的有效指标。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验