Oosterman Joukje M, Wijers Marijn, Kessels Roy P C
Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and Behavior, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2013;20(2):103-9. doi: 10.1080/09084282.2012.670150. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
The Zoo Map Test of the Behavioral Assessment of the Dysexecutive Syndrome battery is often applied to measure planning ability as part of executive function. Successful performance on this test is, however, dependent on various cognitive functions, and deficient Zoo Map performance does therefore not necessarily imply selectively disrupted planning abilities. To address this important issue, we examined whether planning is still the most important predictor of Zoo Map performance in a heterogeneous sample of neurologic and psychiatric outpatients (N = 71). In addition to the Zoo Map Test, the patients completed other neuropsychological tests of planning, inhibition, processing speed, and episodic memory. Planning was the strongest predictor of the total raw score and inappropriate places visited, and no additional contribution of other cognitive scores was found. One exception to this was the total time, which was associated with processing speed. Overall, our findings indicate that the Zoo Map Test is a valid indicator of planning ability in a heterogeneous patient sample.
执行功能障碍综合征行为评估量表中的动物园地图测试常被用于测量作为执行功能一部分的计划能力。然而,该测试的成功表现依赖于多种认知功能,因此动物园地图测试表现不佳并不一定意味着计划能力受到选择性破坏。为解决这一重要问题,我们在一组异质性的神经科和精神科门诊患者样本(N = 71)中研究了计划是否仍是动物园地图测试表现的最重要预测因素。除了动物园地图测试,患者还完成了其他关于计划、抑制、处理速度和情景记忆的神经心理学测试。计划是原始总分和访问不当地点的最强预测因素,未发现其他认知分数有额外贡献。唯一的例外是总时间,它与处理速度相关。总体而言,我们的研究结果表明,在异质性患者样本中,动物园地图测试是计划能力的有效指标。