抽象词的表达：什么才是重要的？对 Paivio（2013）评论 Kousta 等人（2011）的回应。
The representation of abstract words: what matters? Reply to Paivio's (2013) comment on Kousta et al. (2011).
机构信息
Cognitive, Perceptual, and Brain Sciences Research Department.
Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
出版信息
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Feb;142(1):288-291. doi: 10.1037/a0028749.
In Kousta, Vigliocco, Vinson, Andrews, and Del Campo (2011), we presented an embodied theory of semantic representation, which crucially included abstract concepts as internally embodied via affective states. Paivio (2013) took issue with our treatment of dual coding theory, our reliance on data from lexical decision, and our theoretical proposal. Here, we address these different issues and clarify how our findings offer a way to move forward in the investigation of how abstract concepts are represented.
在 Kousta、Vigliocco、Vinson、Andrews 和 Del Campo（2011）的研究中，我们提出了一种具身语义表示理论，该理论的关键之处在于通过情感状态将抽象概念内在地具身化。Paivio（2013）对我们对双重编码理论的处理、我们对词汇判断数据的依赖以及我们的理论建议提出了质疑。在这里，我们将解决这些不同的问题，并阐明我们的发现如何为探索抽象概念的表示方式提供了一种前进的方法。
Zotero 插件