Department of Ecology & Evolution, Stony Brook University Stony Brook, New York, 11794-5245.
Ecol Evol. 2012 Jan;3(1):182-96. doi: 10.1002/ece3.431. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
Species introductions of anthropogenic origins are a major aspect of rapid ecological change globally. Research on biological invasions has generated a large literature on many different aspects of this phenomenon. Here, we describe and categorize some aspects of this literature, to better understand what has been studied and what we know, mapping well-studied areas and important gaps. To do so, we employ the techniques of systematic reviewing widely adopted in other scientific disciplines, to further the use of approaches in reviewing the literature that are as scientific, repeatable, and transparent as those employed in a primary study. We identified 2398 relevant studies in a field synopsis of the biological invasions literature. A majority of these studies (58%) were concerned with hypotheses for causes of biological invasions, while studies on impacts of invasions were the next most common (32% of the publications). We examined 1537 papers in greater detail in a systematic review. Superior competitive abilities of invaders, environmental disturbance, and invaded community species richness were the most common hypotheses examined. Most studies examined only a single hypothesis. Almost half of the papers were field observational studies. Studies of terrestrial invasions dominate the literature, with most of these concerning plant invasions. The focus of the literature overall is uneven, with important gaps in areas of theoretical and practical importance.
人为引起的物种引入是全球快速生态变化的一个主要方面。关于生物入侵的研究产生了大量关于这一现象许多不同方面的文献。在这里,我们描述和分类了该文献的一些方面,以便更好地了解已经研究过的内容和我们所知道的内容,绘制出研究充分的领域和重要的空白。为此,我们采用了系统综述的技术,这些技术在其他科学学科中被广泛采用,以进一步推动在文献综述中使用与主要研究一样科学、可重复和透明的方法。我们在生物入侵文献的领域概述中确定了 2398 项相关研究。这些研究中,大多数(58%)关注生物入侵原因的假说,而关于入侵影响的研究是下一个最常见的研究(占出版物的 32%)。我们在系统综述中更详细地研究了 1537 篇论文。入侵物种具有优越的竞争能力、环境干扰和入侵群落物种丰富度是最常见的检验假说。大多数研究只检验了一个假说。近一半的论文是实地观测研究。陆地入侵研究主导着文献,其中大部分涉及植物入侵。文献的重点整体上是不均衡的,在理论和实际重要性方面存在重要的空白。