Program in Cognitive Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8306, USA.
Cognition. 2013 May;127(2):242-57. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.01.005. Epub 2013 Mar 1.
Five experiments provide evidence for a class of 'dual character concepts.' Dual character concepts characterize their members in terms of both (a) a set of concrete features and (b) the abstract values that these features serve to realize. As such, these concepts provide two bases for evaluating category members and two different criteria for category membership. Experiment 1 provides support for the notion that dual character concepts have two bases for evaluation. Experiments 2-4 explore the claim that dual character concepts have two different criteria for category membership. The results show that when an object possesses the appropriate concrete features, but does not fulfill the appropriate abstract value, it is judged to be a category member in one sense but not in another. Finally, Experiment 5 uses the theory developed here to construct artificial dual character concepts and examines whether participants react to these artificial concepts in the same way as naturally occurring dual character concepts. The present studies serve to define the nature of dual character concepts and distinguish them from other types of concepts (e.g., natural kind concepts), which share some, but not all of the properties of dual character concepts. More broadly, these phenomena suggest a normative dimension in everyday conceptual representation.
五个实验为一类“双重特征概念”提供了证据。双重特征概念从(a)一组具体特征和(b)这些特征所实现的抽象价值这两个方面来描述其成员。因此,这些概念为评估类别成员提供了两个基础和两个不同的类别成员标准。实验 1 为双重特征概念有两个评估基础的观点提供了支持。实验 2-4 探讨了双重特征概念有两个不同的类别成员标准的说法。结果表明,当一个物体具有适当的具体特征,但不符合适当的抽象价值时,它在一种意义上被判断为类别成员,但在另一种意义上不是。最后,实验 5 使用这里发展的理论来构建人工双重特征概念,并检查参与者是否以与自然出现的双重特征概念相同的方式对这些人工概念做出反应。本研究旨在定义双重特征概念的性质,并将其与其他类型的概念(例如自然种类概念)区分开来,后者具有双重特征概念的一些但不是全部属性。更广泛地说,这些现象表明日常概念表示中有一个规范维度。