Suppr超能文献

实时观察米卡芬净和氟康唑对念珠菌生物膜形成的影响

Real-time microscopic observation of Candida biofilm development and effects due to micafungin and fluconazole.

机构信息

Department of Chemotherapy and Mycoses, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2013 May;57(5):2226-30. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02290-12. Epub 2013 Mar 4.

Abstract

To understand the process of Candida biofilm development and the effects of antifungal agents on biofilms, we analyzed real-time data comprising time-lapse images taken at times separated by brief intervals. The growth rate was calculated by measuring the change of biofilm thickness every hour. For the antifungal study, 5-h-old biofilms of Candida albicans were treated with either micafungin (MCFG) or fluconazole (FLCZ). MCFG began to suppress biofilm growth a few minutes after the initiation of the treatment, and this effect was maintained over the course of the observation period. In contrast, the suppressive effects of FLCZ on biofilm growth took longer to manifest: biofilms grew in the first 5 h after treatment, and then their growth was suppressed over the next 10 h, finally producing results similar to those observed with MCFG. MCFG was also involved in the disruption of cells in the biofilms, releasing string-like structures (undefined extracellular component) from the burst hyphae. Thus, MCFG inhibited the detachment of yeast cell clusters from the tips of hyphae. In contrast, FLCZ did not disrupt biofilm cells. MCFG also showed fast antifungal activity against Candida parapsilosis biofilms. In conclusion, our results show that inhibition of glucan synthesis due to MCFG contributed not only to fungicidal activity but also to the immediate suppression of biofilm growth, while FLCZ suppressed growth by inhibiting ergosterol synthesis. Therefore, those characteristic differences should be considered when treating clinical biofilm infections.

摘要

为了理解念珠菌生物膜的形成过程以及抗真菌药物对生物膜的影响,我们分析了实时数据,这些数据由每隔很短时间拍摄的延时图像组成。通过每小时测量生物膜厚度的变化来计算生长速率。在抗真菌研究中,用米卡芬净(MCFG)或氟康唑(FLCZ)处理 5 小时龄的白念珠菌生物膜。MCFG 在治疗开始后几分钟就开始抑制生物膜的生长,这种作用在观察期内持续。相比之下,FLCZ 对生物膜生长的抑制作用需要更长的时间才能显现:生物膜在治疗后的前 5 小时内生长,然后在接下来的 10 小时内被抑制,最终产生与 MCFG 观察到的相似的结果。MCFG 还参与了生物膜中细胞的破坏,从爆发的菌丝中释放出线状结构(未定义的细胞外成分)。因此,MCFG 抑制了酵母细胞簇从菌丝尖端的脱落。相比之下,FLCZ 不会破坏生物膜细胞。MCFG 对近平滑念珠菌生物膜也表现出快速的抗真菌活性。总之,我们的研究结果表明,MCFG 抑制葡聚糖合成不仅有助于杀菌活性,还能立即抑制生物膜的生长,而 FLCZ 通过抑制麦角固醇合成来抑制生长。因此,在治疗临床生物膜感染时,应该考虑这些特征差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

5
Candidemia: Evolution of Drug Resistance and Novel Therapeutic Approaches.念珠菌血症:耐药性的演变及新型治疗方法
Infect Drug Resist. 2021 Dec 19;14:5543-5553. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S274872. eCollection 2021.
7
Effects of farnesol and lyticase on the formation of biofilm.法尼醇和裂解酶对生物膜形成的影响。
Vet World. 2020 Jun;13(6):1030-1036. doi: 10.14202/vetworld.2020.1030-1036. Epub 2020 Jun 8.

本文引用的文献

10
How to build a biofilm: a fungal perspective.如何构建生物膜:真菌视角
Curr Opin Microbiol. 2006 Dec;9(6):588-94. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2006.10.003. Epub 2006 Oct 20.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验