Suppr超能文献

公开报告的医疗质量措施促使威斯康星州的医生团体改善了绩效。

Publicly reported quality-of-care measures influenced Wisconsin physician groups to improve performance.

机构信息

Quality Improvement and Patient Safety Pathway, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.

出版信息

Health Aff (Millwood). 2013 Mar;32(3):536-43. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2012.1275.

Abstract

Public reporting of how physicians and hospitals perform on certain quality of care measures is increasingly common, but little is known about whether such disclosures have an impact on the quality of care delivered to patients. We analyzed fourteen publicly reported quality of ambulatory care measures from 2004 to 2009 for the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality, a voluntary consortium of physician groups. We also fielded a survey of the collaborative's members and analyzed Medicare billing data to independently compare members' performance to that of providers in the rest of Wisconsin, neighboring states, and the rest of the United States. We found that physician groups in the collaborative improved their performance during the study period on many measures, such as cholesterol control and breast cancer screening. Physician groups reported on the survey that publicly reported performance data motivated them to act on some, but not all, of the quality measures. Our study suggests that large group practices will engage in quality improvement efforts in response to public reporting, especially when comparative performance is displayed, as it was in this case on the collaborative's website.

摘要

公共报告医生和医院在某些医疗质量措施上的表现越来越常见,但对于这些披露是否会对患者的医疗质量产生影响知之甚少。我们分析了 2004 年至 2009 年期间威斯康星州医疗质量合作组织(一个由医生团体组成的自愿联盟)的 14 项公开报告的门诊护理质量措施。我们还对该合作组织的成员进行了调查,并分析了医疗保险计费数据,以便将成员的表现与威斯康星州其他地区、邻近州和美国其他地区的提供者进行独立比较。我们发现,在研究期间,合作组织中的医生团体在许多措施上提高了他们的表现,如胆固醇控制和乳腺癌筛查。医生团体在调查中报告说,公开报告的绩效数据激励他们对一些(但不是所有)质量措施采取行动。我们的研究表明,大型团体实践将根据公共报告进行质量改进,特别是当显示比较绩效时,就像在这种情况下在合作组织的网站上显示的那样。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

2
Online physician reviews: is there a place for them?在线医生评价:它们有存在的必要吗?
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019 May 15;12:85-89. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S170381. eCollection 2019.
5
A framework for guiding efforts to reward value instead of volume.一个指导奖励价值而非数量的努力的框架。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2016 Jun;16(2):175-187. doi: 10.1007/s10754-015-9178-9. Epub 2015 Nov 7.

本文引用的文献

3
Improving the quality of hospital care in America.提高美国医院护理质量。
N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 21;353(3):302-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe058150.
9
Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action.改善慢性病护理:将证据转化为行动。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2001 Nov-Dec;20(6):64-78. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64.
10
A survey of 92 quality improvement projects.一项针对92个质量改进项目的调查。
Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2001 Nov;27(11):619-32. doi: 10.1016/s1070-3241(01)27053-9.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验