Westman Andersson Gunilla, Miniscalco Carmela, Johansson Ulrika, Gillberg Christopher
Gillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and The Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2013;2013:384745. doi: 10.1155/2013/384745. Epub 2013 Feb 7.
We wanted to know whether preschool observation of children suspected of suffering from autism can provide the same information about core autism symptoms as the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule (ADOS) performed in a clinic. Forty 2-4-year-old children (9 girls, 31 boys), referred for assessment of suspected autism spectrum disorder participated in the study. The symptom areas covered by the ADOS algorithm were scored by an education specialist after free-field observation of each child in the preschool without using the prescribed ADOS materials. The ADOS was then completed in a clinic setting by examiners blind to the preschool results. Excellent agreement across results obtained at the two different types/settings of observations was found. The only significant difference found was with regard to spontaneous initiation of joint attention. The present study does not address the issue of whether or not one of the methods used is superior to the other when it comes to determining the "true" level of "autism problems" in these children. However, it is of interest that free-field preschool observation of children with suspected autism using a structured checklist yields very similar information as that obtained at ADOS assessment performed in a clinic setting.
我们想知道,对疑似患有自闭症的儿童进行学龄前观察,是否能像在诊所进行的自闭症诊断观察量表(ADOS)那样,提供关于自闭症核心症状的相同信息。40名2至4岁因疑似自闭症谱系障碍而被转诊评估的儿童(9名女孩,31名男孩)参与了这项研究。在学龄前对每个儿童进行自由场景观察后,由一名教育专家对ADOS算法涵盖的症状领域进行评分,观察时不使用规定的ADOS材料。然后,由对学龄前观察结果不知情的考官在诊所环境中完成ADOS评估。结果发现,在两种不同类型/场景下观察所获得的结果之间存在高度一致性。唯一发现的显著差异在于共同注意的自发启动方面。本研究并未探讨在确定这些儿童“自闭症问题”的“真实”水平时,所使用的其中一种方法是否优于另一种方法这一问题。然而,有趣的是,使用结构化检查表对疑似自闭症儿童进行学龄前自由场景观察所获得的信息,与在诊所环境中进行ADOS评估所获得的信息非常相似。