• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Temporal trends in treatment and outcomes for advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction from 1993-2010: findings from a university referral center.1993-2010 年射血分数降低的晚期心力衰竭治疗和结局的时间趋势:来自大学转诊中心的发现。
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 May;6(3):411-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000178. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
2
Improving survival rates of patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy in Tuscany over 3 decades: impact of evidence-based management.过去 30 多年来,托斯卡纳地区特发性扩张型心肌病患者生存率的提高:基于证据的管理的影响。
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 Sep 1;6(5):913-21. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000120. Epub 2013 Jul 25.
3
Efficacy of Pharmacologic and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Therapies in Patients With Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.心力衰竭和射血分数降低患者的药物和心脏植入电子设备治疗效果:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Jun;12(6):e006951. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.118.006951. Epub 2019 Jun 4.
4
Periprocedural Risk and Survival Associated With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Placement in Older Patients With Advanced Heart Failure.老年晚期心力衰竭患者植入式心脏复律除颤器的围术期风险和生存情况。
JAMA Cardiol. 2020 Jun 1;5(6):643-651. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0391.
5
Estimated 5-Year Number Needed to Treat to Prevent Cardiovascular Death or Heart Failure Hospitalization With Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition vs Standard Therapy for Patients With Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction: An Analysis of Data From the PARADIGM-HF Trial.血管紧张素受体-脑啡肽酶抑制剂与标准治疗相比用于射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者的估计 5 年治疗需要人数,以预防心血管死亡或心力衰竭住院:来自 PARADIGM-HF 试验的数据分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2018 Dec 1;3(12):1226-1231. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.3957.
6
Comparison of medical therapy dosing in outpatients cared for in cardiology practices with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction with and without device therapy: report from IMPROVE HF.比较心力衰竭和射血分数降低的门诊心脏病学患者在有无器械治疗的情况下的药物治疗剂量:来自 IMPROVE HF 的报告。
Circ Heart Fail. 2010 Sep;3(5):596-605. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.912683. Epub 2010 Jul 15.
7
INTERMACS (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support) Profiling Identifies Ambulatory Patients at High Risk on Medical Therapy After Hospitalizations for Heart Failure.INTERMACS(机械辅助循环支持跨机构注册中心)分析可识别因心力衰竭住院后接受药物治疗的高危门诊患者。
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Nov;9(11). doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.116.003032.
8
Influence of predictive modeling in implementing optimal heart failure therapy.预测模型在实施心力衰竭最佳治疗中的影响。
Am J Med Sci. 2011 Mar;341(3):185-90. doi: 10.1097/MAJ.0b013e3181ff2393.
9
Digoxin therapy does not improve outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure on contemporary medical therapy.对于接受当代药物治疗的晚期心力衰竭患者,地高辛治疗并不能改善其预后。
Circ Heart Fail. 2009 Mar;2(2):90-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.108.807032. Epub 2009 Feb 10.
10
Triage of patients with moderate to severe heart failure: who should be referred to a heart failure center?中度至重度心力衰竭患者的分诊:哪些患者应转诊至心力衰竭中心?
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Feb 25;63(7):661-671. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.017. Epub 2013 Oct 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes mellitus does not alter mortality or hospitalisation risk in patients with newly diagnosed heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: Time to rethink pathophysiological models of disease progression.糖尿病并不改变新诊断为射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者的死亡率或住院风险:是时候重新思考疾病进展的病理生理模型了。
Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2024 Mar-Apr;21(2):14791641231224241. doi: 10.1177/14791641231224241.
2
Diet-Induced Microbiome's Impact on Heart Failure: A Double-Edged Sword.饮食诱导的微生物组对心力衰竭的影响:一把双刃剑。
Nutrients. 2023 Feb 28;15(5):1223. doi: 10.3390/nu15051223.
3
Education of the Patients Living with Heart Disease.心脏病患者的教育
Mater Sociomed. 2021 Mar;33(1):10-15. doi: 10.5455/msm.2021.33.10-15.
4
Risk Prediction in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Gene Expression Data and Machine Learning.利用基因表达数据和机器学习对射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者进行风险预测
Front Genet. 2021 Mar 22;12:652315. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.652315. eCollection 2021.
5
Natural Products as Modulators of Sirtuins.天然产物作为 Sirtuins 的调节剂。
Molecules. 2020 Jul 20;25(14):3287. doi: 10.3390/molecules25143287.
6
Contemporary use of devices in chronic heart failure in the Netherlands.荷兰慢性心力衰竭患者中装置的当代应用。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Aug;7(4):1771-1780. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.12740. Epub 2020 May 12.
7
GDMT for heart failure and the clinician's conundrum.心力衰竭的 GDMT 治疗与临床医生的困惑
Clin Cardiol. 2019 Dec;42(12):1155-1161. doi: 10.1002/clc.23268. Epub 2019 Sep 16.
8
Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Children.多柔比星致心肌病在儿童中。
Compr Physiol. 2019 Jun 12;9(3):905-931. doi: 10.1002/cphy.c180017.
9
The Combination of Lithium and ACE Inhibitors: Hazardous, Critical, Possible?锂与 ACEI 类药物合用:危险?关键?可能?
Clin Drug Investig. 2019 May;39(5):485-489. doi: 10.1007/s40261-019-00768-7.
10
Fibroblast Growth Factor-23 and Heart Failure With Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction: MESA.成纤维细胞生长因子 23 与射血分数降低型和射血分数保留型心力衰竭:MESA 研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Sep 18;7(18):e008334. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008334.

本文引用的文献

1
Decline in heart transplant wait list mortality in the United States following broader regional sharing of donor hearts.美国扩大区域性供心共享后,心脏移植候补者死亡率下降。
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Mar 1;5(2):249-58. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.111.964247. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
2
Trends in death attributed to heart failure over the past two decades in Europe.过去二十年来欧洲因心力衰竭导致的死亡趋势。
Eur J Heart Fail. 2012 Mar;14(3):234-9. doi: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfr182. Epub 2012 Jan 10.
3
National and regional trends in heart failure hospitalization and mortality rates for Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-2008.1998-2008 年,医疗保险受益人心力衰竭住院率和死亡率的国家和地区趋势。
JAMA. 2011 Oct 19;306(15):1669-78. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.1474.
4
Changing characteristics and mode of death associated with chronic heart failure caused by left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a study across therapeutic eras.左心室收缩功能障碍性慢性心力衰竭的死亡特征和模式变化:跨治疗时代的研究。
Circ Heart Fail. 2011 Jul;4(4):396-403. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.110.959882. Epub 2011 May 11.
5
Trends in length of stay and short-term outcomes among Medicare patients hospitalized for heart failure, 1993-2006.1993-2006 年 Medicare 心力衰竭住院患者住院时间和短期结局的趋势。
JAMA. 2010 Jun 2;303(21):2141-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2010.748.
6
Heart failure: incidence, case fatality, and hospitalization rates in Western Australia between 1990 and 2005.1990 年至 2005 年期间,西澳大利亚心力衰竭的发病率、病死率和住院率。
Circ Heart Fail. 2010 Mar;3(2):236-43. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.109.879239. Epub 2010 Jan 13.
7
Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events.心脏再同步治疗预防心力衰竭事件
N Engl J Med. 2009 Oct 1;361(14):1329-38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0906431. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
8
2009 focused update: ACCF/AHA Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines: developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.2009年重点更新:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会成人心力衰竭诊断与管理指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告:与国际心肺移植学会合作制定。
Circulation. 2009 Apr 14;119(14):1977-2016. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192064. Epub 2009 Mar 26.
9
Long-term trends in first hospitalization for heart failure and subsequent survival between 1986 and 2003: a population study of 5.1 million people.1986年至2003年间心力衰竭首次住院的长期趋势及后续生存率:一项对510万人的人群研究。
Circulation. 2009 Feb 3;119(4):515-23. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.812172. Epub 2009 Jan 19.
10
Cardiac resynchronization therapy for patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a systematic review.左心室收缩功能障碍患者的心脏再同步治疗:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2007 Jun 13;297(22):2502-14. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.22.2502.

1993-2010 年射血分数降低的晚期心力衰竭治疗和结局的时间趋势:来自大学转诊中心的发现。

Temporal trends in treatment and outcomes for advanced heart failure with reduced ejection fraction from 1993-2010: findings from a university referral center.

机构信息

David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.

出版信息

Circ Heart Fail. 2013 May;6(3):411-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000178. Epub 2013 Mar 11.

DOI:10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000178
PMID:23479563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3674961/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of several new therapies for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction over the preceding 2 decades. This study investigates whether these therapeutic advances have translated into improvement in outcomes for patients with advanced HF referred to a heart transplant center.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients with HF (n=2507) referred to a single university center were analyzed in three 6-year eras during which medical and device therapies were evolving: 1993 to 1998 (era 1), 1999 to 2004 (era 2), and 2005 to 2010 (era 3). Impaired hemodynamics and comorbidities were more frequent at time of referral in later eras, whereas other HF severity parameters where similar or improved. Successive eras had greater usage of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, β-blockers, aldosterone antagonists, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy, consistent with evolving evidence and guideline recommendations over the study period. All-cause mortality and sudden death were significantly lower in era 2 and 3 compared with era 1. After multivariable risk adjustment, era 3 had significantly decreased 2- and 3-year all-cause mortality risk and significantly decreased 1- and 3-year sudden death risk compared with era 1. However, progressive HF death and the combined outcome of mortality/urgent transplant/ventricular assist device were modestly increased in the latter eras.

CONCLUSIONS

Over the past 2 decades, patients with advanced HF referred to and managed at a tertiary university referral center have benefited from advances in HF medications and devices, as evidenced by improvements in overall survival and sudden death risk.

摘要

背景

在过去的 20 年中,随机试验已经证明了几种新的心力衰竭(HF)治疗药物在射血分数降低方面的疗效。本研究调查了这些治疗进展是否转化为接受心脏移植中心治疗的晚期 HF 患者结局的改善。

方法和结果

分析了一家大学中心的 2507 例 HF 患者,他们被分为三个 6 年时期,在此期间,医学和设备治疗方法在不断发展:1993 年至 1998 年(时期 1)、1999 年至 2004 年(时期 2)和 2005 年至 2010 年(时期 3)。在较晚的时期,转诊时的血流动力学受损和合并症更为常见,而其他 HF 严重程度参数则相似或有所改善。连续的时期更频繁地使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂、醛固酮拮抗剂、植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗,这与研究期间不断发展的证据和指南建议一致。与时期 1 相比,时期 2 和 3 的全因死亡率和猝死率显著降低。经过多变量风险调整后,与时期 1 相比,时期 3 的 2 年和 3 年全因死亡率风险显著降低,1 年和 3 年猝死风险显著降低。然而,在后几个时期,HF 死亡和死亡/紧急移植/心室辅助装置联合结局的风险略有增加。

结论

在过去的 20 年中,在三级大学转诊中心接受和管理的晚期 HF 患者受益于 HF 药物和设备的进步,这体现在总体生存率和猝死风险的改善上。