David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
Circ Heart Fail. 2013 May;6(3):411-9. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.112.000178. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
Randomized trials have demonstrated the efficacy of several new therapies for heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction over the preceding 2 decades. This study investigates whether these therapeutic advances have translated into improvement in outcomes for patients with advanced HF referred to a heart transplant center.
Patients with HF (n=2507) referred to a single university center were analyzed in three 6-year eras during which medical and device therapies were evolving: 1993 to 1998 (era 1), 1999 to 2004 (era 2), and 2005 to 2010 (era 3). Impaired hemodynamics and comorbidities were more frequent at time of referral in later eras, whereas other HF severity parameters where similar or improved. Successive eras had greater usage of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, β-blockers, aldosterone antagonists, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, and cardiac resynchronization therapy, consistent with evolving evidence and guideline recommendations over the study period. All-cause mortality and sudden death were significantly lower in era 2 and 3 compared with era 1. After multivariable risk adjustment, era 3 had significantly decreased 2- and 3-year all-cause mortality risk and significantly decreased 1- and 3-year sudden death risk compared with era 1. However, progressive HF death and the combined outcome of mortality/urgent transplant/ventricular assist device were modestly increased in the latter eras.
Over the past 2 decades, patients with advanced HF referred to and managed at a tertiary university referral center have benefited from advances in HF medications and devices, as evidenced by improvements in overall survival and sudden death risk.
在过去的 20 年中,随机试验已经证明了几种新的心力衰竭(HF)治疗药物在射血分数降低方面的疗效。本研究调查了这些治疗进展是否转化为接受心脏移植中心治疗的晚期 HF 患者结局的改善。
分析了一家大学中心的 2507 例 HF 患者,他们被分为三个 6 年时期,在此期间,医学和设备治疗方法在不断发展:1993 年至 1998 年(时期 1)、1999 年至 2004 年(时期 2)和 2005 年至 2010 年(时期 3)。在较晚的时期,转诊时的血流动力学受损和合并症更为常见,而其他 HF 严重程度参数则相似或有所改善。连续的时期更频繁地使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂/血管紧张素受体阻滞剂、β受体阻滞剂、醛固酮拮抗剂、植入式心脏复律除颤器和心脏再同步治疗,这与研究期间不断发展的证据和指南建议一致。与时期 1 相比,时期 2 和 3 的全因死亡率和猝死率显著降低。经过多变量风险调整后,与时期 1 相比,时期 3 的 2 年和 3 年全因死亡率风险显著降低,1 年和 3 年猝死风险显著降低。然而,在后几个时期,HF 死亡和死亡/紧急移植/心室辅助装置联合结局的风险略有增加。
在过去的 20 年中,在三级大学转诊中心接受和管理的晚期 HF 患者受益于 HF 药物和设备的进步,这体现在总体生存率和猝死风险的改善上。