Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Medicine, the Center for Transfusion and Cellular Therapies, Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and the Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine and the Atlanta Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Atlanta, Georgia.
Transfusion. 2013 Nov;53(11):2619-2628. doi: 10.1111/trf.12111. Epub 2013 Mar 11.
Clinical outcomes in transfused patients may be affected by the duration of blood storage, possibly due to red blood cell (RBC)-mediated disruption of nitric oxide (NO) signaling, a key regulator of vascular tone and blood flow.
AS-1 RBC units stored up to 42 days were sampled at selected storage times. Samples were added to aortic rings ex vivo, a system where NO-mediated vasodilation could be experimentally controlled.
RBC units showed storage-dependent changes in plasma hemoglobin (Hb), RBC 2,3-diphosphoglycerate acid, and RBC adenosine triphosphate conforming to expected profiles. When freshly collected (Day 0) blood was added to rat aortic rings, methacholine (MCh) stimulated substantial NO-mediated vasodilation. In contrast, MCh produced no vasodilation in the presence of blood stored for 42 days. Surprisingly, the vasoinhibitory effects of stored RBCs were almost totally mediated by RBCs themselves: removal of the supernatant did not attenuate the inhibitory effects, while addition of supernatant alone to the aortic rings only minimally inhibited MCh-stimulated relaxation. Stored RBCs did not inhibit vasodilation by a direct NO donor, demonstrating that the RBC-mediated vasoinhibitory mechanism did not work by NO scavenging.
These studies have revealed a previously unrecognized vasoinhibitory activity of stored RBCs, which is more potent than the described effects of free Hb and works through a different mechanism that does not involve NO scavenging but may function by reducing endothelial NO production. Through this novel mechanism, transfusion of small volumes of stored blood may be able to disrupt physiologic vasodilatory responses and thereby possibly cause adverse clinical outcomes.
输注患者的临床结局可能受到血液储存时间的影响,这可能是由于红细胞 (RBC) 介导的一氧化氮 (NO) 信号转导中断所致,NO 是血管张力和血流的关键调节剂。
在选定的储存时间点采集储存至 42 天的 AS-1 RBC 单位样本。将样本添加到离体主动脉环中,这是一个可以实验控制 NO 介导的血管舒张的系统。
RBC 单位的血浆血红蛋白 (Hb)、RBC 2,3-二磷酸甘油酸和 RBC 三磷酸腺苷发生了与预期模式一致的储存依赖性变化。当将新鲜采集的(第 0 天)血液添加到大鼠主动脉环中时,乙酰甲胆碱 (MCh) 刺激了大量的 NO 介导的血管舒张。相比之下,在存在储存 42 天的血液的情况下,MCh 未引起血管舒张。令人惊讶的是,储存 RBC 的血管抑制作用几乎完全由 RBC 本身介导:去除上清液不会减弱抑制作用,而仅将上清液单独添加到主动脉环中只能轻微抑制 MCh 刺激的松弛。储存的 RBC 不会通过直接的 NO 供体抑制血管舒张,这表明 RBC 介导的血管抑制机制不是通过 NO 清除起作用的。
这些研究揭示了储存 RBC 的一种以前未被认识到的血管抑制活性,其比已描述的游离 Hb 的作用更强,作用机制不同,不涉及 NO 清除,但可能通过减少内皮细胞 NO 产生而起作用。通过这种新的机制,输注少量储存的血液可能能够破坏生理血管舒张反应,并可能因此导致不良的临床结局。