• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MAST CLA 和 OPTIGEN 的对比研究。

Comparison study between MAST CLA and OPTIGEN.

机构信息

Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, Konkuk University, Korea.

出版信息

Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):e156-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3646.

DOI:10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3646
PMID:21819752
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The MAST-CLA system (Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics, Inc., Mountain View, CA) is an in vitro diagnostic test for the simultaneous determination of specific IgE to different allergens. Recently, a new generation of MAST-CLA was developed (OPTIGEN; Hitachi Chemical Diagnostics). The purpose of this study was to determine the performance of these two tests for the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis.

METHODS

Suspicious allergic rhinitis patients were divided into four groups and their medical records were reviewed: group 1 patients were tested with the MAST-CLA and skin-prick tests (251 patients), group 2 patients were tested with the OPTIGEN and skin-prick tests (319 patients), group 3 patients were tested with the MAST-CLA and CAP (104 patients) tests, and group 4 patients were tested with the OPTIGEN and CAP tests (270 patients). The correlation between MAST-CLA and OPTIGEN to skin-prick and CAP tests was determined.

RESULTS

The positivity percentage of MAST-CLA results was higher than with skin-prick and CAP tests, and the results for the OPTIGEN test were comparable with skin-prick test and CAP. This suggests that the MAST-CLA test might have a slightly higher rate of giving false positive results. The OPTIGEN test correlated better with the skin-prick test and CAP.

CONCLUSION

The OPTIGEN test performed better than the MAST-CLA test for diagnosing allergic rhinitis.

摘要

背景

MAST-CLA 系统(日立化学诊断公司,加利福尼亚州山景城)是一种用于同时测定不同过敏原特异性 IgE 的体外诊断测试。最近,开发了新一代的 MAST-CLA(OPTIGEN;日立化学诊断)。本研究的目的是确定这两种测试在过敏性鼻炎诊断中的性能。

方法

将可疑过敏性鼻炎患者分为四组并回顾其病历:组 1 患者接受 MAST-CLA 和皮肤点刺测试(251 例),组 2 患者接受 OPTIGEN 和皮肤点刺测试(319 例),组 3 患者接受 MAST-CLA 和 CAP(104 例)测试,组 4 患者接受 OPTIGEN 和 CAP 测试(270 例)。确定 MAST-CLA 和 OPTIGEN 与皮肤点刺和 CAP 测试的相关性。

结果

MAST-CLA 结果的阳性百分比高于皮肤点刺和 CAP 测试,而 OPTIGEN 测试的结果与皮肤点刺测试和 CAP 相当。这表明 MAST-CLA 测试可能具有稍高的假阳性率。OPTIGEN 测试与皮肤点刺测试和 CAP 相关性更好。

结论

OPTIGEN 测试在诊断过敏性鼻炎方面优于 MAST-CLA 测试。

相似文献

1
Comparison study between MAST CLA and OPTIGEN.MAST CLA 和 OPTIGEN 的对比研究。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Jul-Aug;25(4):e156-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3646.
2
In vitro diagnostic evaluation of patients with inhalant allergies: summary of probability outcomes comparing results of CLA- and CAP-specific immunoglobulin E test systems.吸入性过敏患者的体外诊断评估:比较CLA和CAP特异性免疫球蛋白E检测系统结果的概率结果总结。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2003 Jul-Aug;24(4):253-8.
3
Clinical evaluation of lumiward immunoassay system for detection of specific IgE associated with allergic rhinitis.用于检测与过敏性鼻炎相关特异性IgE的鲁米沃德免疫分析系统的临床评估
Acta Otolaryngol Suppl. 1998;538:169-77.
4
Performance characteristics of a new automated enzyme immunoassay for the measurement of allergen-specific IgE. Summary of the probability outcomes comparing results of allergen skin testing to results obtained with the HYTEC system and CAP system.一种用于测量过敏原特异性IgE的新型自动化酶免疫测定法的性能特征。将过敏原皮肤试验结果与使用HYTEC系统和CAP系统获得的结果进行比较的概率结果总结。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 1997 Jul;79(1):27-34. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)63080-3.
5
[Comparison of two specific immunoglobulin E test systems in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis].[两种特异性免疫球蛋白E检测系统在变应性鼻炎诊断中的比较]
Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2009 Jun;23(11):484-7.
6
[Skin reactivity in the histamine-equivalent skin test in hypersensitivity to grass pollen].[草花粉过敏患者组胺等效皮肤试验中的皮肤反应性]
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 2000 May-Jun;128(5-6):194-9.
7
Comparison of three in vitro assays for serum IgE with skin testing in asthmatic children.
Ann Allergy. 1994 Oct;73(4):329-36.
8
Correlation analysis of two serum-specific immunoglobulin E test systems and skin-prick test in allergic rhinitis patients from northeast China.中国东北地区变应性鼻炎患者两种血清特异性免疫球蛋白 E 检测系统与皮肤点刺试验的相关性分析。
Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2011 Mar-Apr;25(2):116-9. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2011.25.3572. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
9
[Diagnostic problems before specific immunotherapy in patients with late-summer seasonal allergic rhinitis].[夏末季节性变应性鼻炎患者特异性免疫治疗前的诊断问题]
Orv Hetil. 1994 Sep 4;135(36):1963-6.
10
[Allergen specific IgE measurement with Polycheck Allergy: comparison of three multiple allergen simultaneous tests].[使用Polycheck Allergy进行变应原特异性IgE检测:三种多种变应原同步检测方法的比较]
Korean J Lab Med. 2009 Oct;29(5):465-72. doi: 10.3343/kjlm.2009.29.5.465.

引用本文的文献

1
Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps Does Not Affect the Association Between the Nasal Provocation Test and Serum Allergen-Specific Immunoglobulin E Levels.伴鼻息肉的慢性鼻-鼻窦炎不影响鼻激发试验与血清变应原特异性免疫球蛋白E水平之间的关联。
J Rhinol. 2024 Mar;31(1):29-36. doi: 10.18787/jr.2024.00004. Epub 2024 Mar 31.
2
Point-of-care diagnostics for infectious diseases: From methods to devices.传染病的即时诊断:从方法到设备。
Nano Today. 2021 Apr;37:101092. doi: 10.1016/j.nantod.2021.101092. Epub 2021 Feb 6.
3
Correlations Between the Adenotonsillar Microbiome and Clinical Characteristics of Pediatric Patients With Snoring.
腺样体扁桃体微生物群与小儿打鼾患者临床特征的相关性
Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Aug;14(3):295-302. doi: 10.21053/ceo.2020.01634. Epub 2020 Nov 11.
4
Comparison of an automated microfluidic immunoassay technology (BioIC, lab-on-chips) and ImmunoCAP assay. Lab-on-chips as a tool for specific IgE (sIgE) detection.一种自动化微流控免疫分析技术(BioIC,芯片实验室)与免疫CAP分析的比较。芯片实验室作为特异性IgE(sIgE)检测的工具。
Postepy Dermatol Alergol. 2020 Feb;37(1):56-60. doi: 10.5114/ada.2020.93383. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
5
Dysbiosis of Inferior Turbinate Microbiota Is Associated with High Total IgE Levels in Patients with Allergic Rhinitis.下鼻甲微生物群失调与变应性鼻炎患者总 IgE 水平升高有关。
Infect Immun. 2018 Mar 22;86(4). doi: 10.1128/IAI.00934-17. Print 2018 Apr.
6
Comparison of the ImmunoCAP Assay and AdvanSure™ AlloScreen Advanced Multiplex Specific IgE Detection Assay.免疫捕获法检测与AdvanSure™ AlloScreen高级多重特异性IgE检测法的比较。
Yonsei Med J. 2017 Jul;58(4):786-792. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.786.
7
Comparison of three multiple allergen simultaneous tests: RIDA allergy screen, MAST optigen, and polycheck allergy.三种多过敏原同时检测方法的比较:RIDA 过敏原筛查、MAST optigen 和 polycheck 过敏原。
Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013:340513. doi: 10.1155/2013/340513. Epub 2012 Dec 24.