Wolpin J, Burke R J, Greenglass E R
York University, Ontario, Canada.
Psychol Rep. 1990 Apr;66(2):451-7. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1990.66.2.451.
The present investigation examined three issues relevant to Golembiewski's phase model of psychological burnout. These were use of the mean versus median in creating high and low subgroups on Maslach Burnout Inventory subscales, use of different item structures on Maslach subscales, and different sequences of Maslach subscales proposed by Golembiewski and Maslach in the development of psychological burnout. Use of mean versus median, or different item structures on Maslach subscales, made relatively little difference. Golembiewski's ordering of the subscales, compared to Maslach's, produced a more linear progression over the 8 phases, as well as on three antecedents and consequences, but both sequences were related to these three variables in an almost identical fashion.
本研究探讨了与戈伦比夫斯基心理倦怠阶段模型相关的三个问题。这些问题包括在编制马氏倦怠量表子量表的高分组和低分组时使用均值与中位数的情况、马氏子量表上不同的项目结构，以及戈伦比夫斯基和马氏在心理倦怠发展过程中提出的马氏子量表的不同顺序。使用均值与中位数，或者马氏子量表上不同的项目结构，产生的差异相对较小。与马氏的量表排序相比，戈伦比夫斯基的量表排序在8个阶段以及三个前提和后果方面呈现出更线性的进展，但两种顺序与这三个变量的关联方式几乎相同。
